charleslanger
CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
- Joined
- Dec 21, 1999
- Messages
- 3,061
- Reaction score
- 0
TenchHut general:
I don't take kindly to having my posts edited, unless maybe if it's quid pro quo:
I get to edit the useless liberal trash you espouse, the moronic blackjack & exotic bet advice you give, & even worse: the blatant sell out evidenced by sticking up for certain rogue advertisers & individuals, as well as the occasional 'infomercial / plug'.
The first instance mentioned can maybe be excused due to developing combat fright(just don't blather on too much around past veterans or someone will bayonet your gut)-- but not the others: the second example is due to plain laziness, the latter has to be ineptitude-- you haven't made money in other endeavors, so now you need to make a few dollars any way you can. I hope your conscience allows you to sleep tranquil, w/o having to resort to chemical substances.
Nice gig you obtained-- you get paid to, in an independent betting forum--
be a kindergarten cop, dispense erroneous advice, spin egregious book behavior & further, insert a plug here and there.
If i were to put out a paid newsletter and/or website-- chock full of the drivel you post here-- i'd have everyone demanding an immediate refund: i'd be accused of being a shameless paid shill & charlatan provider of incorrect counsel.
From now on, Gomer-- just stay the freak away from what i write:
you have no reason or even excuse to-- as we've never had any type of interchange;
you've never addressed any comment directly to me, nor answered any email-- you didn't even deign to insert a comment w/ the edit.
This means that the first & only interaction you and I have had so far, is a shut up from you-- w/o even a reason given. This in spite of my past referring to/about you in nothing but a reverent & respectul manner, much less call you on any of your inane/ridiculous writings.
charles langer
I don't take kindly to having my posts edited, unless maybe if it's quid pro quo:
I get to edit the useless liberal trash you espouse, the moronic blackjack & exotic bet advice you give, & even worse: the blatant sell out evidenced by sticking up for certain rogue advertisers & individuals, as well as the occasional 'infomercial / plug'.
The first instance mentioned can maybe be excused due to developing combat fright(just don't blather on too much around past veterans or someone will bayonet your gut)-- but not the others: the second example is due to plain laziness, the latter has to be ineptitude-- you haven't made money in other endeavors, so now you need to make a few dollars any way you can. I hope your conscience allows you to sleep tranquil, w/o having to resort to chemical substances.
Nice gig you obtained-- you get paid to, in an independent betting forum--
be a kindergarten cop, dispense erroneous advice, spin egregious book behavior & further, insert a plug here and there.
If i were to put out a paid newsletter and/or website-- chock full of the drivel you post here-- i'd have everyone demanding an immediate refund: i'd be accused of being a shameless paid shill & charlatan provider of incorrect counsel.
From now on, Gomer-- just stay the freak away from what i write:
you have no reason or even excuse to-- as we've never had any type of interchange;
you've never addressed any comment directly to me, nor answered any email-- you didn't even deign to insert a comment w/ the edit.
This means that the first & only interaction you and I have had so far, is a shut up from you-- w/o even a reason given. This in spite of my past referring to/about you in nothing but a reverent & respectul manner, much less call you on any of your inane/ridiculous writings.
charles langer
