Maybe you should check out McCain's track record before firing on Obama
Please do as McCain flip/flops worse than Bush
Worse yet:
Bush is the biggest disaster in American Political History and McCain guarantees to carry on his Failed Policies
Yet folks in this country think carrying on the "Legacy" of a man with
an Approval rating of 23% is good for this country?
:nohead::nohead::nohead:
Please do as McCain flip/flops worse than Bush
Worse yet:
Bush is the biggest disaster in American Political History and McCain guarantees to carry on his Failed Policies
Yet folks in this country think carrying on the "Legacy" of a man with
an Approval rating of 23% is good for this country?
:nohead::nohead::nohead:
I don't know for sure, but he thinks if he's winning in the 9th inning, he won, so I'd be real careful with that one.
Using a baseball analogy, Obama said May 8 that if after Tuesday's primaries "we have a majority of pledged delegates, which is possible, then I think we can make a pretty strong claim that we have got the most runs and its the ninth inning and we have won."
Speaking of Lies ...
<script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7805397860504090"; /* Thread, MedRectangle, Unreg */ google_ad_slot = "5273749396"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_region="test"; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script><iframe name="google_ads_frame" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-7805397860504090&dt=1215134654612&lmt=1215134654&prev_slotnames=7216269925&output=html&slotname=5273749396&correlator=1215134654566&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2Fdiscuss%2Fduboard.php%3Faz%3Dview_all%26address%3D132x6453321®ion=test&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2Fdiscuss%2F&frm=0&cc=100&ga_vid=3620671028855936500.1214853346&ga_sid=1215133883&ga_hid=1314006941&ga_fc=true&flash=9.0.115&u_h=768&u_w=1024&u_ah=740&u_aw=1024&u_cd=16&u_tz=-300&u_his=3&u_java=true&u_nplug=26&u_nmime=107" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="250" scrolling="no" width="300"></iframe>
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->http://www.newsweek.com/id/144518/page/1
http://www.newsweek.com/id/144518/page/1
<script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7805397860504090"; /* Thread, MedRectangle, Unreg */ google_ad_slot = "5273749396"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250; google_ad_region="test"; //--> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script><iframe name="google_ads_frame" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-7805397860504090&dt=1215134654612&lmt=1215134654&prev_slotnames=7216269925&output=html&slotname=5273749396&correlator=1215134654566&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2Fdiscuss%2Fduboard.php%3Faz%3Dview_all%26address%3D132x6453321®ion=test&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2Fdiscuss%2F&frm=0&cc=100&ga_vid=3620671028855936500.1214853346&ga_sid=1215133883&ga_hid=1314006941&ga_fc=true&flash=9.0.115&u_h=768&u_w=1024&u_ah=740&u_aw=1024&u_cd=16&u_tz=-300&u_his=3&u_java=true&u_nplug=26&u_nmime=107" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="250" scrolling="no" width="300"></iframe>
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->http://www.newsweek.com/id/144518/page/1
FACTCHECK.ORG
Miscounting Obama's Tax Votes
Republicans claim Obama "voted 94 times for higher taxes." But their count is inflated and misleading.
The McCain campaign and the Republican National Committee both claim that Obama has voted 94 times "for higher taxes." We find that their count is padded.
After looking at every one of the 94 votes that the RNC includes in its tally, we find:
* Twenty-three were for measures that would have produced no tax increase at all; they were against proposed tax cuts.
* Seven of the votes were in favor of measures that would have lowered taxes for many, while raising them on a relative few, either corporations or affluent individuals.
* Eleven votes the GOP is counting would have increased taxes on those making more than $1 million a year – in order to fund programs such as Head Start and school nutrition programs, or veterans' health care.
* The GOP sometimes counted two, three and even four votes on the same measure. We found their tally included a total of 17 votes on seven measures, effectively padding their total by 10.
* The majority of the 94 votes – 53 of them, including some mentioned above – were on budget measures, not tax bills, and would not have resulted in any tax change. Four other votes were non-binding motions related to conference report negotiations.
It's true that most of the votes the GOP counts would either have increased taxes for some, or set budget targets calling for such increases. But by repeating their inflated 94-vote figure, McCain and the GOP falsely imply that Obama has pushed indiscriminately to raise taxes for nearly everybody. A closer look reveals that he's voted consistently to restore higher tax rates on upper-income taxpayers but not on middle- or low-income workers. That's consistent with what he's said he'd do as president, which is to raise taxes only on those making more than $250,000 a year.
The article continues with an excellent analysis of just how the RNC came up with their warped count. A very good read and good to have on hand to counter RNC talking points.Miscounting Obama's Tax Votes
Republicans claim Obama "voted 94 times for higher taxes." But their count is inflated and misleading.
The McCain campaign and the Republican National Committee both claim that Obama has voted 94 times "for higher taxes." We find that their count is padded.
After looking at every one of the 94 votes that the RNC includes in its tally, we find:
* Twenty-three were for measures that would have produced no tax increase at all; they were against proposed tax cuts.
* Seven of the votes were in favor of measures that would have lowered taxes for many, while raising them on a relative few, either corporations or affluent individuals.
* Eleven votes the GOP is counting would have increased taxes on those making more than $1 million a year – in order to fund programs such as Head Start and school nutrition programs, or veterans' health care.
* The GOP sometimes counted two, three and even four votes on the same measure. We found their tally included a total of 17 votes on seven measures, effectively padding their total by 10.
* The majority of the 94 votes – 53 of them, including some mentioned above – were on budget measures, not tax bills, and would not have resulted in any tax change. Four other votes were non-binding motions related to conference report negotiations.
It's true that most of the votes the GOP counts would either have increased taxes for some, or set budget targets calling for such increases. But by repeating their inflated 94-vote figure, McCain and the GOP falsely imply that Obama has pushed indiscriminately to raise taxes for nearly everybody. A closer look reveals that he's voted consistently to restore higher tax rates on upper-income taxpayers but not on middle- or low-income workers. That's consistent with what he's said he'd do as president, which is to raise taxes only on those making more than $250,000 a year.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/144518/page/1
