This shows you just how ignorant the American people are. It's comical

[Benassflick]

From CNN
And asked which man would better handle relations with other countries, Bush -- charged by his critics with alienating the world community through unilateralism -- beat his Democratic challenger by a 52 percent to 44 percent margin.

And here is the facts:
Global survey shows 30 of 35 countries want Kerry in White House
So how the fuc would Bush have better relations with all these countries that know he is a lying, deserter moron. Go figure. You've got to chalk it up to lack of intelligence.

Thats right everybody hates him and doesn't trust him but yeah I think we will have great relations with these countries.

Get it through you brains fuk wads. Your next closest alia in this is Britain and they are pulling out more troops then Poland yes I said Poland Bahhhh and they are pulling out more troops as well. Does this sound like you have world or unanimous support.


Does this sound like Bush is getting along with other countries????

Kerry was strongly preferred among all of America's traditional allies, including Norway (74 percent compared with Bush's seven percent), Germany (74 percent to 10 percent), France (64 percent to five percent), the Netherlands (63 percent to six percent), Italy (58 percent to 14 percent) and Spain (45 percent to seven percent).

 

[stacilu]

BAF

Saw this same report, the idiots will either deny it or claim
the liberal media made it up or say who cares what the world
thinks. Facts right in front of their face and yet they
refuse to acknowledge them. What can an intelligent person
think? Some of it is just good old fashioned stupidity.
Some of it is a deep hatred for anything contrary to
conservative views and the rest of it--who the f.... knows?

 

[Shotgun]

BAF

Saw this same report, the idiots will either deny it or claim
the liberal media made it up or say who cares what the world
thinks. Facts right in front of their face and yet they
refuse to acknowledge them. What can an intelligent person
think? Some of it is just good old fashioned stupidity.
Some of it is a deep hatred for anything contrary to
conservative views and the rest of it--who the f.... knows?

You know sweetie, there is a lot of anger inside you. You should relax a bit, and realize that there is no reason to be disagreeable when someone disagrees with you. When someone has a different opinion, it doesn't mean they are stupid, ignorant, or an idiot. They simply disagree. If you claim to be so much smarter than everyone else on here, now is the time to actually show it. Saying someone is ugly doesn't make you prettier.

 

[lander]

You know sweetie, there is a lot of anger inside you. You should relax a bit, and realize that there is no reason to be disagreeable when someone disagrees with you. When someone has a different opinion, it doesn't mean they are stupid, ignorant, or an idiot. They simply disagree. If you claim to be so much smarter than everyone else on here, now is the time to actually show it. Saying someone is ugly doesn't make you prettier.

When people ignore logic and reason to instead form their own logical false premises/conclusions then, yes, those people are "stupid, ignorant, or an idiot."
There's really no sugar coating this one, sweetie.

 

[stacilu]

Shotgun


I have some bad news for you, I am not a homosexual.
"Not that there is anything wrong with that." However,
if you want to call me "sweetie," you are just going to
have to take me out to dinner and buy me candy. Also,
I don't claim to be smarter than most people. I just claim
to be more educated than most. There is a difference
Mr. Shotgun, subtle but it does exist. Can I assume that
you are highly educated in psychology? You must be since
you can make an assumption about the "anger" in a person
without even knowing them. Actually I can't even remember
the last time I raised my voice. You do know what they
say about people that "assume."

 

[Shotgun]

When people ignore logic and reason to instead form their own logical false premises/conclusions then, yes, those people are "stupid, ignorant, or an idiot."
There's really no sugar coating this one, sweetie.

How right you are Lander.

 

[xpanda]

You know sweetie, there is a lot of anger inside you. You should relax a bit, and realize that there is no reason to be disagreeable when someone disagrees with you. When someone has a different opinion, it doesn't mean they are stupid, ignorant, or an idiot. They simply disagree. If you claim to be so much smarter than everyone else on here, now is the time to actually show it. Saying someone is ugly doesn't make you prettier.

I'll bet you're wicked good in the sack.

Oh, and to be sure, my saying that DEFINITELY makes me even better at it. Survey says and all ...

Me, at the office tonight --> :drink:

 

[Shotgun]

Shotgun


I have some bad news for you, I am not a homosexual.
"Not that there is anything wrong with that." However,
if you want to call me "sweetie," you are just going to
have to take me out to dinner and buy me candy. Also,
I don't claim to be smarter than most people. I just claim
to be more educated than most. There is a difference
Mr. Shotgun, subtle but it does exist. Can I assume that
you are highly educated in psychology? You must be since
you can make an assumption about the "anger" in a person
without even knowing them. Actually I can't even remember
the last time I raised my voice. You do know what they
say about people that "assume."

Lander called me sweetie as well...does that mean I get dinner and candy from him?


I know all too well the difference between educated and intelligence. But I never knew one had to be highly educated in psychology in order to detect anger in another person...usually simple comments like "you're stupid" tells me I'm in trouble. Do some people actually have to study years of psychology in order to figure that out?

 

[lander]

Shotgun,
No candy until the second date.

I hope Dick Cheney doesn't read this and miss the sarcasm -- I might start getting RNC spam

 

[stacilu]

Let me assure you that these posts never get me angry.
To be sure they are simply a source of entertainment,
I just love to listen to people try to rationalize the irrational.
My comments are simply used to keep them on the
edge, in most cases it works and they bury themselves
with ever greater moronic comments. At the end of
the evening a few colleagues and I enjoy tremendously
how ridiculous most of you can become. It simply takes
a little gentle prodding. I imagine most of you think I
am a "dyed in the wool liberal." hardly the case. I am what
most intelligent people woud call a semi-independent and
semi-libertarian. Many of the liberals arguments are hogwash
and most of the conservative arguments are reactionary.
Every issue requires study and restudy. There are very
few blacks and whites--only shades of gray.

Ok now you know my secrets and you spoiled all my fun.
No problem, this way I can apologize sincerely to any person
whose feelings I hurt. They were only words to get you
on the defensive and react--and you did.

Mr. B will probably win this election and I assume that many
issues will lean very lopsided to the right. When the people
have had enough of that kind of politic they will install
liberals and the country will swing back to the left. Both
will tend to counter-balance and in the long run not much
gain by anybody. It simply is the history of polticis in
this country.

Have a great evening.

 

[GAMEFACE]

Americans can give a rats azz what socialist think. Most would give their right nut to be an American.

 

[TheGeneral+]

Its a game. All these countries are dumb.

 

[stacilu]

Game


What do you mean by that? Americans can give.....

 

[GAMEFACE]

The liberal/socialist medias frame America/Bush in a negative way. Americas done more for the world than any 10 countries combined, end of story.

 

[stacilu]

Game


Pretty hard to argue your point, but I think we still need
allies. Don't you agree.

 

[GAMEFACE]

Staci,

Don't be brain washed by the liberal media. We have more allies now than we had at the end of WW2. France, Germany and Russia were all being paid off by Saddam. They would have never helped. Besides they don't have troops to offer. America did the right thing.

 

[TheGeneral+]

America did the right thing.<!-- / message -->

According to the world, no we did not.

 

[GAMEFACE]

Pete,

If Americas actions were framed by the moore-like liberal media in WW2 the world would think the courageous Americans that gave everything were wrong.

You know as well as I do our soldiers are the best in the world and 99.8% are trying get Iraq back on track. We could level the cities where we are having trouble, but we choose not to. America could not sit back and wait and see how bad the next attack would be.

 

[Marco]

Quote from GAMEFACE: "America did the right thing."

Response from The General: "According to the world, no we did not."

Since when did the US ever respect the borders or business of any other sovereign nation? (not that there really are anymore, other than the US.)

If Saddam was such a threat he should have been taken out during the Gulf War, when world opinion was on our side, and the invasion of Kuwait gave us justification for doing so.....what did we do? we pushed him across the border, waited a decade and then figured out he was a rabid dog.....threw a fighting force together with little plan and no exit strategy.....claims of having oil revenues pay for rebuilding but instead just socking it to the American taxpayer.....lofty hopes for a nation headed for civil war.....OBL and the real terrorists on the loose elsewhere but just to be sure let's create a few thousand more enemies in Iraq.....everybody knows you just can't have too many people looking to extract revenge....

So after Vietnam, Korea, and this botched inept attempt in Iraq....the world is supposed to think highly of the US and welcome back for a second term the president who started this abortion and comes out with clever sayings like "mission accomplished" in the middle of the death toll? LMAO.....

 

[xpanda]

The liberal/socialist medias frame America/Bush in a negative way. Americas done more for the world than any 10 countries combined, end of story.

Hmm. Nice try. Conservatives and neoconservatives and Bush supporters paint liberals and socialists in a negative way as well. It's the way it is.

Your second statement has nothing to do with the first statement, unless you think that the US under Bush has done more for the world than any 10 countries combined. I would argue that many of those great things the US has done (and it has) were not and are not specifically credited to any one party or President, but are attributed to a long history of liberal internationalism.

But, with Bush at the helm, you need to start subtracting from that history of 'do-gooderness' ....