The verdict is in. Long live the Queen!

Search
Dave007inVegas

Dave007inVegas

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Willie99

Willie99

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,146
Tokens
SheriffJoe

SheriffJoe

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,405
Tokens
I hope the Secret Service realizes what a sham this whole thing is and becomes as lax with security as the Wicked Witch of the Left was with Benghazi.
 
Willie99

Willie99

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,146
Tokens
BleedingPurple said:
We've known this for months
Click to expand...

QFT

I didn't expect there to be any charges, but when the FBI director started citing one broken law after another, I didn't expect his conclusion to be "a difficult case to prosecute"

She exposed "top secret information", he made that conclusion and that's breaking a law, but decided it's not worth prosecuting.

I'm going to suggest his decision is political, and not because he supports Clinton, but because it's probably best for the country that they don't prosecute.

The same reason Justice Roberts rewrote Obamacare and called the program fees "taxes", so it would not be unconstitutional.

The same reason Nixon didn't request a recount in 1960 (Look how Gore divided the country 40 years later)

this was the path of least resistance, point out the problems but decline prosecution.
 

vitterd

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
No worries.....I'm sure repubs have another phony scandal to show their fake outrage again coming up real soon.

As usual, when the facts get decided by the the people who matter.....they differ from the opinion of RX republicans. Benghazi, emails , Monica......what's next dummies?:):)
 
Dave007inVegas

Dave007inVegas

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
SheriffJoe

SheriffJoe

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,405
Tokens
“To be clear this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions but that’s not what we’re deciding here. “ -- FBI Director

##)
CmnXNpnVIAAJXbx.jpg
 
MantisToboggan

MantisToboggan

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
vitterd said:
No worries.....I'm sure repubs have another phony scandal to show their fake outrage again coming up real soon.

As usual, when the facts get decided by the the people who matter.....they differ from the opinion of RX republicans. Benghazi, emails , Monica......what's next dummies?:):)
Click to expand...

To compare this to Monica and/or Benghazi is a complete hack move.
 
SheriffJoe

SheriffJoe

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,405
Tokens
Trump needs to parlay this to even more anti-establishment anger...

"See, I told you the political system is hopelessly rigged!

Then when the gaystream attacks him (but, but, but...the FBI cleared her. It's time to move on!) double down and come across even more pissed off:

"The American people are the establishment's political pawns on their global chessboard! They have nothing but contempt for your Constitution and freedoms!"

If it leads to his winning the election, so be it.

If it leads to something bigger, even better.
 

vitterd

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Sheriff Joe said:
That's what hacks do.

He doesn't care about right and wrong, logic and the rule of law.

All he cares about is "his side winning"
Click to expand...

I didn't win.....but you lost.

Everybody on on both sides agreed the FBI director would do the right thing. Now that it's no charges.....he will be called a political hack by the right.
 
SheriffJoe

SheriffJoe

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,405
Tokens
ALTERNATIVE HEADLINE: “FBI DECLARES HILLARY CLINTON TO BE COMPLETE LIAR”

I don’t expect we’ll see that headline, but Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post comes close to delivering this judgment:
Here’s the good news for Hillary Clinton: The FBI has recommended no charges be brought followings its investigation of the former secretary of state’s private email server.

Here’s the bad news: Just about everything else.

FBI director James Comey dismantled large portions of Clinton’s long-told story about her private server and what she sent or received on it during a stirring 15-minute press conference following which he took no questions. While Comey exonerated Clinton legally speaking, he provided huge amounts of fodder that could badly hamstring her in the court of public opinion.

Most importantly, Comey said that the FBI found 110 emails on Clinton’s server that were classified at the time they were sent or received. That stands in direct contradiction to Clinton’s repeated insistence she never sent or received any classified emails. And, it even stands in contrast to her amended statement that she never knowingly sent or received anyclassified information. . .

Comey said that Clinton had used not one but multiple private email servers during her time at State. He said that Clinton used multiple emails devices during that time. (She had offered her desire to use a single device for “convenience” as the main reason she set up the private server.) He noted that the lawyers tasked by Clinton with sorting her private emails from her professional ones never actually read all of the emails (as the FBI did in the course of its investigation). . .

​
Cillizza’s conclusion:


It’s hard to read Comey’s statement as anything other than a wholesale rebuke of the story Clinton and her campaign team have been telling ever since the existence of her private email server came to light in the spring of 2015. She did send and receive classified emails. The setup didleave her — and the classified information on the server — subject to a possible foreign hack. She and her team did delete emails as personal that contained professional information.

​
About those thousands of “private” emails Hillary deleted, one of our readers sensibly asks:


One issue I have not seen addressed in the media is how a busy person could have half of her emails deemed as personal . If you are busy maybe 5 to 10 percent is a stretch but 50 percent either means she was not working at her job or hiding something probably as a result of Clinton Foundation connections – we may never find that out but any busy person understands the 50 percent is just not possible and suggests only one reasonable conclusion.

​
I think a great many Americans will understand the larger picture here quite clearly. It certainly doesn’t help the fading public trust in our political class.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,865
Messages
13,574,261
Members
100,878
Latest member
fo88giftt

Share this page

The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com
@2023 TheRX. All rights reserved.21+. Bet Responsibly: If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, seek help at 1-800-Gambler