The Tsunami, The US, The UN, and the rest of the World

Search

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens

There are over six billion people living on our planet. Of that six billion, almost two billion are Muslims. That's roughly a third of the total population of the earth.

The earthquake that triggered the killer tsunami was centered just off the coast of the Indonesian island of Sumatra. Indonesia is the world's most populous Muslim country. It was also the most severely devastated by the wave. Nearly 100,000 of the victims of the December 26 catastrophe were Indonesian Muslims.

The vast majority of the victims were either Muslims, Buddhists or Hindu.

Now, to the United Nations. The United Nations consists of 186 countries. The most consistent voting bloc is the fifty-seven Islamic countries that generally vote with one voice, especially when the United States or Israel are voting the other way.

The United Nations' head of humanitarian relief, Jan Egeland, criticized the West for being stingy. He didn't specifically mention America, but he cited the exact percentage of the US GDP that is budgeted for foreign aid, so there is little doubt of who the 'stingy West' was, at least in Egeland's mind.

Egeland slammed the United States for not raising taxes so that America could give a greater percentage of its GDP to the UN to distribute as part of the UN's foreign aid package.

Editorials in the Washington Post, the New York Times and other newspapers echoed Egeland's charge, with the New York Times calling America's $350 million in direct government aid 'miserly'.

The United States makes up some six percent of the world's total population, but we pay a quarter of the United Nation's total budget. The United States pays forty percent of the world's total disaster relief aid, and sixty percent of the world's total food donations. The $2.4 billion (that's BILLION) dollars Washington spent in em ergency aid in 2003 represented 40 percent of the total amount of emergency assistance from all bilateral donors provided that year.

Meanwhile, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan was still on his vacation, skiing in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. He returned to New York four days later.

The wave struck on Sunday, and it took only until Monday before the US announced its $350 million in initial aid, sent the USS Abraham Lincoln Battle Group, with all its supporting ships, into the region, including helicopters, and C-130 transport planes, sent hundreds of tons of pre-packaged emergency aid supplies, and deployed some 14,000 American troops to help with the recovery and cleanup.

In Indonesia, U.S. helicopters flew many, many sorties, delivering 60,000 pounds of water and supplies, from the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln along a 120-mile stretch of Sumatra island's ravaged coastline.

Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, the richest nations in the Islamic world, donated a paltry $10 million each. The United Arab Emirates donated some $20 million - this to relieve the suffering of their Islamic brothers.

Egypt's contribution so far is $104,000.00. (Egypt gets $2 BILLION in US foreign aid annually)

Assessment: Did anybody notice that the majority of the private donations came from those US corporations? Pfizer donated $10 million in cash and $25 million in drugs. (That is more than oil-rich Saudi Arabia and Kuwait combined). General Motors pledged $2 million in cash, agreed to match employee donations dollar for dollar, and is sending vehicles to transport food and medical supplies to the region.

Other corporate donors include Nike Inc., American Express, General Electric, First Data Corp., Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Exxon-Mobil, Citigroup, Marriott International and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Actress Sandra Bullock donated one million dollars and is neither an activist nor a liberal. (She also donated one million following September 11.) Bono and Bruce Springsteen are promising to hold another 'aid concert' but that will collect other people's money (not theirs) for the victims.

America, as noted at the outset, represents six percent of the global population. But in a catastrophe, it seems to get one hundred percent of the blame. Could the UN be jealous and anxious because the US may funnel its aid through its own channels instead of the UN's various aid agencies.

Does Kofi Annan want to use the catastrophe to shore up the UN's sagging image in the wake of the Oil-For-Food thefts from Iraq? Does the United States want to ensure the aid doesn't end up lining the pockets of UN officials again? So the US is 'too stingy' ...?

By the way, where is the rest of the Islamic world? There are fifty-seven Islamic nations, and the world's biggest Islamic nation is the one that took the hardest hit. But the United States -- the world's largest donor nation -- seems to be grabbing all the headlines for being 'stingy'. Is that fair? Is that objective?? Is that just???

Dr. Michael McKee mmckee101@yahoo.com
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
Most US "foreign aid" is military BB.
The US taxpayer massively subsidising US military suppliers.

i.e. US Government tells Egyptian Government it can buy $1.5 billion of US manufactured military equipment.

Egyptians choose loads of high tech US military kit.
US companies supply amazing high tech kit to the Egyptian military.
The US Government pays the US company the value of the deal.

Then people like The Blighted One can post posts that the US gives more "foreign aid" (ie aid to "help the poor and needy") than everyone else combined.

heh

Its really just socialist freebie handouts for the US military industrial complex.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
I wish folks would shut the hell up ... I lived in a 3rd world country and the USA is a blessed nation ...

Belly up and helping other "Human beings" with basis essentials is not a lot to ask for ...
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Critisizing and blaming the most generous country in the world and telling them to shut the fck up.Is not a lot to ask for either.

doc you remind me of Lee Harvey Oswald a fxckin clueless disillusined communist.
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
eek - you can't help being the socialist that you are! After all, what would the average Brit tax payer and Brit company do with their own money if the government didn't confiscate it as taxes? Maybe donate some of it?

Doc Mullah - shouldn't you be at a Klan meeting or something? The problem with most third world countries is their own governments - and the Democrats would have a fit if the US tried to do something about that.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Per capita, American gov't aid to the Tsunami isn't even close to being at the top. Qatar and Norway have you beat by a mile. Uh, so does Canada ($400M and only 32M people.)

Also, the US in several years in arrears on payments to the UN, to the tune of $15B or some such number. Thus, this quote:

The United States makes up some six percent of the world's total population, but we pay a quarter of the United Nation's total budget. The United States pays forty percent of the world's total disaster relief aid, and sixty percent of the world's total food donations. The $2.4 billion (that's BILLION) dollars Washington spent in emergency aid in 2003 represented 40 percent of the total amount of emergency assistance from all bilateral donors provided that year.

... is bunk.

(And, if you get to use the 'we're only 6% of the world's population' stat to promote your do-gooderness, then can we use it against you for stats like pollution contributions or military expenditures or capital ownership?)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
I'm surprised Doc Mullah found the time to respond to this since he's so busy with his contributions to charity. I'd have expected you to be performing relief work in the area of devistation by now, Doc...are you writing from your laptop?

Excellent piece btw, BB. This whole episode is akin to a homeless bum begging for change, so you give him a few quarters...and he responds "You cheap f*cker...you know you can afford to give me a 20. Pull out the big frogs, not the chump change."


(And, if you get to use the 'we're only 6% of the world's population' stat to promote your do-gooderness, then can we use it against you for stats like pollution contributions or military expenditures or capital ownership?)

Only if you let us use the "we as a nation contribute more to the progress of mankind than the rest of the nations combined on earth" argument. We do more good than anyone else, are more innovative than anyone else, and are more generous than anyone else. There's no reason for us to sheepishly apologize to the rest of the world for being who we are.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
And, if you get to use the 'we're only 6% of the world's population' stat to promote your do-gooderness, then can we use it against you for stats like pollution contributions or military expenditures or capital ownership?)

JD thats the usual phoney global baloney line. "pollution contributions" I'm surprised the phrase "for the children" was left out.
Contribute to who? the criminal 3rd world pygamies at the UN?
When is the pressure on China going to be made for "pollution contributions".
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
Jdeuce: I contributed immediately ...

Unlike your phony ass, I didnt base my decisions on how many of those poor folks have black skin

You are a shallow, disgusting racist ...
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
Ohmygod! Doc says to JDeuce "Unlike your phony ass, I didnt base my decisions on how many of those poor folks have black skin". I didn't see JDeuce merntion the color of anyone's skin.

Doc - you are such a laughable liar! You're that biggest bigot on this forum! I haven't seen one mention - anyplace - about the color of the tsunami victim's skin; and here you are bringing it up - for no apparent reason!

Doc - you continue to insist that you aren't a bigot -but all of your words say otherwise!
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
Coulter:

FYI I've dealt with numeruous Bushies and their reason for that was strictly based on skin color. ..

Then again, with Limbaugh being the biggest racist in the history of the media, not suprised

How much have you contributed???
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
Doc Mullah, it's just as I thought; It's the Bush's fault that you brought up someone's skin color! It seems to me that as far as you're concerned, Bush is the cause of all of your problems. You don't make any mistakes, do you?

Doc - every time you post, you show your true colors - you're a small minded white sheet bigot!

As for how much I contribute to any causes - well, I could say that I contributed $20K, but I'm just not that rich or that crass, and I don't lie about such things. So let's say that I contribute what I can afford without waiting for a catastrophe to strike so I can then contribute and brag about it!
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
Coulter: I make mistakes EVERY DAY and admit up to them and apologize when needed ... unlike Bush who comes off as a complete jackass: "I dont recall any mistakes I made in term #1 .."

My sales mgr is African-American ... I dont base my personal or business relationships on the color of skin ... the Bushies are a gross band of bigots ... then again, with Limbaugh as the all-time racist on the airwaves, why should anyone be suprised that everything the Bushies do is based on race

Coulter ... your bigot views are disgusting
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,519
Messages
13,569,358
Members
100,818
Latest member
c54credit1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com