The Sports Cruncher 2016 NCAAF Preseason Guide

Search

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Hey all, there's a big, free version of my preseason guide available from my website. I'm not posting to break rules promoting my website -- having been around for almost 20 years those that know me what I've contributed to these forums. Just google me.

If you have any questions or comments about the format or projections -- anything about the guide at all, we can talk about them here!
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
I'll be posting some season win plays and analysis here over the coming week based off it as well.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
University of Toledo Football 2016: Rockets with a Glaring Red Weakness?

Toledo had a terrific 10-2 2015, capping the year off with a solid 32-17 bowl game drubbing of the Temple Owls, a card carrying member of the Power 5. Yes, the Rockets failed to clear the NIU Huskie hurdle game for the umpteenth time in a row, losing in week #10 (at home no less), costing them a chance at competing for the conference crown, but this will be the year, right? Let's take a look.

Coaching

The Rockets' 2011-2015 head coach, Matt Campbell, made the P5 jump to Iowa State. Offensive coordinator Jason Candle has been promoted to head coach, so don't expect much in the way of offensive hiccups as a result.

New OC Brian Wright had good success elevating the offense at Florida Atlantic, though the FAU offense struggled last year in part due to key injuries early in the season.

Former DC Jon Heacock followed coach Campbell to Cyclone country, paving the way for Kent State DC Brian George to fill the vacancy. If you know anything about Kent football, you know that defense is the ONLY thing they've done well there recently. Well poached, Toledo.


Offense

A completely rebuilt offensive line for the 2015 campaign was a cause for concern, but the new line played pretty well. My rankings had the Rockets with the 47th best run offense and 79th best pass offense last year. QB Phillip Ely started off the year struggling but turned it around after the first month, finishing with his best game in the bowl win. 2014 starting QB Logan Woodside will retake the starters' reins for the graduated Ely. Numbers and history suggest the QB play will be about the same for Toledo in 2016. Woodside let Toledo to a 2014 bowl victory against 2016 week #1 opponent Arkansas State, a psychological plus to start the season.

I rate Toledo's run game to be a little better than last year. The offensive line is back, as well as the Two Headed Terrorizing Tandem of running backs Kareem Hunt and Terry Swanson, who accounted for more than 70% of Toledo's rush yards last year. Returning as well is Damion Jones-Moore, another solid contributer at RB.

Defense

Okay, here's where the Rockets glaring red weakness might, or might not, materialize. Defense was the strength of the Toledo team last year, ranking 22nd against the run and 40th against the pass.

In addition to the coaching changes, they're losing a lot of returning production. My numbers have them returning only 26% of their defensive line tackles, 64% of their linebacking tackles, and 44% of their secondary tackles, returning a low 45.1% of their tackles overall. That ranks them 8th worst in FBS by my numbers.

While experience will be thinner across their defensive units, each level does return some key experience. DL Hester and Stepec step up, LBs Coleman and Woodley are the men in the middle, while safety DeJuan Rogers will anchor the air defense. Pardon the "anchoring the air" oxymoron, lol.

Still, I've given Toledo some unhealthy defensive regression deductions across the board while preparing my projections. I've dinged them about as hard as any other team, considering that they don't have the recruiting to quickly make up for lost "over achieving versus your recruiting numbers" production.

Crunched

Do the coaching and player losses add up to Toledo being significantly worse than the 10-2 team they were last year? (The 10 wins includes the bowl game, after they had a week #1 game against Stony Brook cancelled for weather, I believe it was. So 10-2 would have been their most likely regular season record as well)

The most recent season wins line for Toledo from South Point in Vegas had the Over/Under at 6.5 wins, which is saying that Toledo is going to backslide into a middle of the road MAC team. My numbers still project them to be amongst the conference elite, in spite of the added defensive regression factored in.

The MAC league media just voted Toledo to finish 2nd in the division behind Western Michigan, which lines up with my numbers. I project Toledo to go unbeaten in conference play until a final week loss versus also conference-unbeaten Western Michigan on the Broncos home turf. I project Toledo's other two losses of the season to be at Arkansas State in week #1 (a winnable game, by all means) and in week #5 at BYU (a tougher spot, but not unthinkable).

Back to back road games at Akron and NIU will be tough, but those teams are flawed enough that I project Toledo to win them both by near a touchdown. So yes, Toledo does play most of their tougher games on the road this season, which isn't beneficial. The flipside to that? What remains for their home games is a weaker lineup of teams, raising their win floor for the season.

Home games against Fresno, Maine, Bowling Green, Central Michigan, Ohio and Ball State should all be wins. Yes, CMU still has a good passing game and Ohio should rebound after an injury-plagued season, but neither should upset Toledo at home. Bowling Green lost almost of their skill players on offense, as well as their coaches.

Of those 6 home games, I'm willing to commit to a 5 game win floor for Toledo. Minimum -- I think they win all 6. A game at Eastern Michigan and now we're at 6 or7 wins. A split at worst in the @Akron and @NIU games and Toledo is at 7 or 8 wins, already clearing the 6.5 wins Over/Under. The projected losses at ARST, BYU and WMU are all winnable freerolls, then -- a chance to steal a game as an underdog to potentially offset a loss they suffered as a favorite.

With a projected raw W/L record of 9-3 and an 8.5 wins projection when converting margin of victory projections to chance of winning games percentages, Toledo, to me, offers solid value on the Over 6.5 season wins.

Offensive continuity should keep them in every game that their rebuilding defense will potentially hamper them in. Toledo will only face one MAC team with an above average run defense from last year, Akron. And Akron loses a TON of returning tackles, even more than Toledo, returning only 38%. The table is set for Toledo to run over a weak slate of MAC run defenses.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Navy Football 2016: Filling the Space of One Cadet

Keenan Reynolds was a fantastic quarterback for Navy; now he's a Baltimore Raven in the NFL. With his senior leadership and numbers I liked Navy to make a big splash entering the AAC last year, recommending an Over season wins play, which easily hit. If not for the inability of the defense to get their mitts on Houston's slippery Greg Ward Jr. on Thanksgiving weekend last year, Navy may have won the conference.

How much will Navy regress, given the loss of Reynolds and 76% of all their rushing yards, not to mention the entire starting offensive line, who all helped Navy be my 6th ranked run offense? Let's go below decks and find out.

Coaching

Head Coach Ken Niumatalolo strongly considered taking the BYU HC position this past off-season, out of Mormon loyalty as much as anything else. He elected to stick with his football loyalties, thankfully for the Navy football program. This year, as much as any in his past will show how much of Navy's success is down to his ability to put the right guys in the right positions with the right coaching.


Offense

The offensive line, as mentioned, lost a senior to shining senior front that was extremely effective. This year's projected starting line reads as SO,SR,JR,JR,JR from left to right. Backing them up is another line of mostly Juniors and then another line of Sophomores. One thing Navy has going for it is a lot of bodies.

At the skill positions it's nothing but Seniors and Juniors in the three deep, which should offset some of the yardage losses.

SB Dishan Romine returns as the perimeter run threat, a role he played well with his 10.5 ypc average last year, though it was on only 36 carries. The bulk of Navy's runs go the FB on the dive or the QB keeper. Top FB Chris Swain is gone, but that's as much of a plug and play position as there is for that offense (unless someone can make me a compelling case otherwise, lol). Swain had 211 carries last year, Reynolds had 265, and then you drop off all the way down to 62 carries for the next man, Quentin Ezell, another senior fullback last year. I think they can find some guys to dive into the line with or without the ball, with out too much drop off in productivity on those plays.

So really, it's all about replacing Reynolds. I think they are in as good as shape to do it this year as possible.

Senior QB Tago Smith is as physically gifted as Reynolds, and has shined in his opportunities on the field. Tago didn't see the field a lot last year as Reynolds never missed a start, but he did come in for Reynolds in the 2nd quarter against Notre Dame when Reynolds got dinged up. Smith proceeded to lead Navy to two straight touchdown drives and a 21-21 tie at half. So consider that acing an extremely pressure filled, if short, pop quiz.

I've hit Navy with a 20% reduction in their passing game expectations, and a 15% reduction for their running game expectations. Considering the turnover it's entirely possible that larger reductions should have been applied. Considering the betting lines, others have worse expectations than I do. My numbers had Navy undervalued for most of the season last year, and I found myself recommending plays on them almost every single week, which of course led to winning more often than losing on them.

As you would expect, teams that my numbers considered undervalued last year are still undervalued this year when looking at season win totals.

Defense

Navy enters the season having lost about a third of its' defensive tackles from last year, which is right on the FBS average. Their losses were concentrated, though, on the defensive line and in the secondary, which isn't ideal.

As a result, and because they put up such excellent defensive numbers last year, I think some regression is in store for a program that just can't reload with superior talent every year.

I don't really have anything else I want to say about the defense, other than I've hit them with a 10% regression deduction for pass defense, and a 15% regression deduction for run defense.

Crunched

Tago Smith has the legs and the arm, but what makes for great quarterbacks happens in the head. Fortunately Navy has a few warm-up wins on their schedule to get Tago acclimated to leading a team for a full game. First they get FCS Fordham at home, followed by another home game against UConn. The Huskies should be an improved team this year, but I still like Navy to win at home by 11 points. In week #3 Navy gets their first road game at Tulane, who will still be in the early throes of learning a completely overhauled Willie Fritz offense.

That looks like 3 wins to start the season before a tough 6 game stretch where I actually project Navy to lose 4. All of those 6 games are winnable (and, losable) with the exception of the longer odds shot @ Notre Dame.

I like Navy to finish the regular season with 3 wins as well with games against Tulsa, @ SMU and against Army.

Navy could regress a fair amount more than I'm already estimating and still hit that win floor of 6 games. There should be a minimum of one other win either @ ECU, vs. Memphis, @ AFA, vs. HOU or @ USF to put them at 7+ wins.

My projections are for Navy to go 8-4, with a projected margin of victory converted to % chance 8.1 wins. As such, I think there's solid value on Navy going Over 6.5 wins in 2016. As long as that high win floor holds, it should be smooth enough sailing.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Continuing on with another Over season wins play or two before getting to the Unders. Comments or questions welcome.

San Diego State Football 2016: A Favorable Aztec Calendar

Four games into the 2015 NCAAF season and things were looking downright apocalyptical for the Aztec football team: a 1-3 record comprised of a thorough drubbing by Cal, an unthinkably embarrassing home loss to Southern Alabama, and then a predictable loss at Penn State. SDSU didn't deserve any of those games, either. Even Southern Alabama outgained them by 206 yards.

The lone win was against the San Diego Toreros in week #1. They didn't play particularly good in that game, either, but were the beneficiaries of two pick 6s and a +5 turnover margin.

I didn't hate that loss to Southern Alabama, as I had both they and SDSU with season win Over plays last year, and I figured SOAL was going to need wins more than SDSU.

That turned out to be the case. SOAL ended up with 5 wins, winning the Over 3.5. 5.0 wins was exactly what I modeled for the Jaguars last year. Success! lol

For SDSU the projection was 8.6 wins and a 10-2 raw record. With little room left to spare for the Over 7.5 (with a stiff -175 juice), the Aztecs rattled off 9 straight wins including a conference championship win over Air Force. The success of the season was further solidified with an absolute thumping of the QB Kiel-less Cincinnati Bearcats in the Hawai'i Bowl. It was one final chance for a big play on the Aztecs and it was clearly marked on our calendar.

Can the Aztecs repeat the successes of 2015?

Coaching

Rocky Long enters his 5th year as head coach of the Aztecs this season. He holds the defensive coordinator reins as well, and it is that side of the ball the Aztecs excelled at last year, finishing 2015 as my 24th best ranked defense, versus 79th best for the offense.

Jeff Horton continues as the offensive coordinator and running backs coach. Jeff has a ton of experience at both the collegiate and NFL level.

No shake ups here is good new for projecting continuity.


Offense

SDSU does lose starting QB Maxwell Smith this year, but I don't think anyone is particularly concerned, as he put up pretty average numbers and didn't contribute to the run game. This year's projected QB starter, Christian Chapman, put up better passing numbers while providing a running threat. He threw for 22% of SDSU's passing yards last year, so he won't be completely green, even if he's just a Sophomore.

The left side of the offensive line and center are Senior strong, but the right side will have some new bodies, so if there's a weakness, it's likely to be there.

Last year the Aztecs had a great 1-2 punch at running back with Donnel Pumphrey and Chase Price, who both averaged near 5.4 ypc, while gaining 51% and 31% of the team's rush yards, respectively. Rashad Penny had a 6.0 ypc average on 61 carries last year, so look for him to scoop up Price's carries.

SDSU's run game should, if anything, be even stronger with QB Chapman's mobility this year. SDSU returns a solid 72% of its' receiving yards, so as long as Chapman doesn't regress the Aztecs rate to move a little higher than the 79th ranked offense of last year.


Defense

The Aztecs return 76.1% of their tackles, 76% of their sacks, and 65% of their interceptions.

The defense should be good.

SDSU does lose kicker Donny Hageman. He put up decent, if not spectacular numbers, but breaking in new kickers and punters is generally statistically bad for teams.


Crunched

My preseason manual adjustments tend to be fairly conservative, with leans toward recruitment rankings.

As such, I've given SDSU a -5% adjustment to their passing game as a hedge on Chapman's overall inexperience. I left their rushing projections flat, even though I think that Chapman's mobility will more than make up for the new pieces on the right side of the line.

Defensively, I gave the Aztecs a small -2% adjustment to pass defense and a -5% adjustment to their rush defense projections. As I wrote above, they return a higher than average percent of tackles from last year's squad, but considering the excellent numbers they put up last year and their somewhat below average recruiting ranks, if anything, the defense might be just a tick behind last year's.

Overall, you can see a picture emerging from the Aztec's camera of a squad that should strongly resemble last year's snapshot.

SDSU is a strong run-first team, running on 74% of standard downs last year, which interestingly enough was the exact same percentage of New Mexico, where Rocky coached from '98-'08. Georgia Tech had the same percentage, and together they tied for the 5th highest run percentage of plays behind only the service academies and Georgia Southern.

The Long road looks to be smoother than Rocky this year. I project SDSU to have a very high win floor of 8 games. They avoid Boise State and play their only P5 opponent, Cal, at home -- a game in which they are favored in spite of last year's 7-35 Goff-lead loss. What does that tell you? Not all quarterback losses are the same, lol.

SDSU's other close games are toss ups at NIU and USU. Barring catastrophic injuries, I just don't see this team losing more than 3 games, making the Over 8.5 wins a solid value. If they can get past CAL and NIU early in the season they have a very good chance of getting to the conference championship game unbeaten.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
My top 25 is just a rundown of my projected power ratings heading into the year. After this list I have another list of what I think the postseason top 25 will be, based on records and the playoff.


Preseason Top 25


Rank -- Team -- Rating


#1 -- Alabama -- 94.1
#2 -- LSU -- 89.1
#3 -- Clemson -- 87.1
#4 -- Oklahoma -- 85.0
#5 -- Florida St. -- 80.7
#6 -- Tennessee -- 79.8
#7 -- Mississippi -- 78.9
#8 -- Ohio State -- 77.9
#9 -- Notre Dame -- 74.3
#10 -- Georgia -- 73.8
#11 -- Texas A&M -- 73.5
#12 -- Auburn -- 73.5
#13 -- Stanford -- 73.3
#14 -- Arkansas -- 73.2
#15 -- Washington -- 73.1
#16 -- USC -- 73.0
#17 -- Michigan -- 72.4
#18 -- Baylor -- 72.1
#19 -- North Carolina -- 69.6
#20 -- Mississippi St. -- 69.2
#21 -- Florida -- 69.1
#22 -- TCU -- 68.7
#23 -- Louisville -- 68.2
#24 -- Michigan St. -- 67.1
#25 -- Iowa -- 66.8


Postseason Top 25


#1 -- LSU
#2 -- Alabama
#3 -- Oklahoma
#4 -- Florida St.
#5 -- Clemson
#6 -- Washington
#7 -- Ohio State
#8 -- Tennessee
#9 -- Notre Dame
#10 -- Iowa
#11 -- Baylor
#12 -- Stanford
#13 -- TCU
#14 -- Michigan St.
#15 -- Louisville
#16 -- South Florida
#17 -- North Carolina
#18 -- San Diego St.
#19 -- Houston
#20 -- UCLA
#21 -- Georgia
#22 -- USC
#23 -- Nebraska
#24 -- Mississippi
#25 -- Western Michigan

Even I'm surprised that I have Texas A&M that high in the preseason rankings, lol. Their tough SEC schedule means they're likely a 500 ball club that will finish out of the rankings, though.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,544
Tokens
Nice work!!

I cant wait to see your spreadsheets and wonder if i should pay you for your picks or how to super improve my excel spreadsheet skills.

Best of luck this season
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Thanks, Knightro -- hey, I know what I'd do. :)

UNLV Football 2016: Rebels with a Cause?

Last year the Over/Under for UNLV season wins was 2.5 games. Anyone optimistic enough to back a rookie coach in a bottomed out program ended up being rewarded at seasons' end when UNLV notched 3 wins. They came awful close to winning twice that many games, though.

This year the O/U for UNLV is between 5 and 5.5 games. Is there
reason to believe the Runnin' Rebels will win almost twice as many games in Sanchez' Sophomore season, turning the close losses into wins?

Let's take a closer look at last season's games, first.

UNLV nearly upset NIU on the road to open the season, but then lost badly at home to UCLA after starting QB Decker was injured early on. Backup QB Palandech logged a 1.7 QB rating in relief, and no scores except for a fourth quarter field goal. Ouch. There's a theme you'll see developing here...

The defense put in a spirited game at Michigan, holding them to 28 points. Decker finally led the offense to its' first touchdown with 9:17 to play in the 4th, but Palandech relieved him after that for the rest of the game, and predictably did not lead the team on any additional scoring drives.

Week #4 saw UNLV trounce Idaho State 80-8. Even without the stats from that game my numbers liked UNLV to cover at Nevada, which they did, winning outright 23-17. Tough luck set in as UNLV then lost to San Jose State in OT and then Fresno by a mere 3 points.

Still, the Runnin' Rebels fought on, and took Boise State into the 4th quarter at home only down a touchdown. The defense wilted, though, as Boise outscored UNLV 28-7 in the fourth quarter.

UNLV bounced back with solid 20 point win against Hawaii.

Decker was hurt again against Colorado State after getting out to a hot start. Palandech was finally able to lead the team to some scores in relief, but the defense couldn't hold off the Rams, allowing 49 points.

With the defense experiencing a regression renaissance, and QB Decker still out with an injury, UNLV was predictably (and profitably) pulverized by San Diego State.

Decker returned for the season finale at Wyoming, and had a pretty good day. It wasn't enough, though, as Wyoming QB Coffman put up superior numbers, as did the Wyoming running game. The UNLV defense just didn't have anything left in the tank at this point, it seemed.

2015 was a promising season that was derailed by close losses, a QB injury, and a declining defense.

Coaching

Head coach Tony Sanchez was the rarest of Pokemon last year, making the jump from high school head coach directly to FBS head coach. The skepticism was substantial. Still, he was able to pull in coordinators with a wealth of experience.

OC Barney Cotton certainly had the better side of the ball in 2015. UNLV had my 80th ranked offense, even with Decker missing what added up to a few games because of injury.

DC Kent Baer's run defense started off the season gamely but was a total sieve from week 7 on. The Rebels' final 6 games all qualified as a "worst" game of run defense with my rescored stats, after allowing only two such games against their first 5 FBS opponents. That's versus the one qualifying game of "best" run defense they had for the season in the win at Nevada. At the end of the season I ranked the UNLV's run defense 125th out of 128.

Other than the season opening shredding by NIU, UNLV's pass defense wasn't horrible, finishing up with a ranking of 97th. They might have even been a little better than that, with an equal 4 "best" and "worst" qualifying games of pass defense. But as the rush defense went, so, largely did the pass defense, fading late in the season.

Offense

The key component of the Reb's offense, QB Decker, has graduated from the program. Things would like frightful for the offense if it were up to Palandech to now shoulder the load, as he was woefully not up to the task last year. The task should fall to Junior transfer Johnny Stanton.

Stanton comes to UNLV via the University of Nebraska, just like OC Cotton. Stanton never really worked out at Nebraska, and last year played at Saddleback College where he put up decent numbers. Stanton is a dual threat to run as well, running for 705 yards and 12 touchdowns last year.

UNLV returns a fair amount of experience on the offensive line, but depth could be an issue. Skill positions shouldn't be a worry. With Stanton's previous familiarity with Nebraska's offense, which has a lot in common with the imported version that the coaches brought over, there's a good chance the UNLV offense can hit the ground running...and passing.

Defense

There's less reason to be optimistic for the defense. They return 59% of their tackles, and only 38% in their secondary, which was the strength of their defense.

A few solid JUCO transfers and improvements in recruiting should help offset some of the losses. Better knowledge of the system in this, the coaching staff's second year, should help as well.

I'm not sure how much improvement you can expect out of a thin, poorly performing defense, though. They were giving it up to some poor offenses late last year.

Crunched

A bet on UNLV's season wins Over/Under is the same as a bet on whether UNLV will be bowl eligible or not, and when you think of it like that you might, like me, still consider it a bit out of reach for the Rebs. I project them to win 4.9 games with a 4-8 final record. That means I have them down for a few close losses this year.

UNLV gets a week one near gimme against Jackson State, but then have to play their role as a cupcake at UCLA and Central Michigan. I give UNLV a 0% chance at UCLA and a 20% chance at CMU, which is something.

UNLV needs to have any growing pains they might have early out of the way by week 4, as their two most winnable games come back to back at home against Idaho and Fresno. I like UNLV to win both games by about 8 points.

After that comes a loss at San Diego State, followed by an important game at Hawaii. It's hard to know what to expect from Hawaii, coming off a terrible season with a completely new staff and scheme in place. Still, my best estimates are for a narrow Hawaii 3 point win.

Then it's back home for a virtual toss up against Colorado State. After that comes a probable loss at San Jose State, a bye, and then a narrow 3 point win against Wyoming at home. That's their last win of the season I project, though, with a road loss at Boise and a season ending home loss to Nevada by the narrowest of margins.

I project UNLV to go just 1-3 in games decided by less than a touchdown, but with 3 of those 4 games coming at home all of those games could swing either way. I'm willing to say that the near absolute best case scenario for UNLV will be 7 wins in 2016. As long as the offense isn't too far off of last year's production, the win floor should be 4 games. I just don't see them losing that Wyoming game, in spite of the close projection. They should win one of the closely projected losses as well, putting them at 5 wins. That's right near the betting lines.

If you put a gun to my head at midnight somewhere off the side of Highway 93 tonight, I'd take the Under, especially if you can get the 5.5. But with the prospect of so many winnable home games for UNLV, I'd breathe a sigh of relief if you just let me slump to the ground, money still in wallet, as you steamed your way to Ely under a clear Nevada night sky.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Washington State Notes

The Cougars had a fairly inauspicious start to the 2015 season, greeting the home fans to the season with a 24-17 loss to FCS Portland State. They followed that up with a last minute win at Rutgers, and a ho-hum 31-14 win against a poor Wyoming team. Wyoming actually outgained WSU in that game, but didn't score at all after the 1st quarter.

Their first conference game was a close loss at Cal. I don't know if anyone saw what was coming up for the Cougars, though, as they clawed their way through their tough PAC-12 schedule with wins against Oregon, Oregon State, Arizona, Arizona State, UCLA and Colorado.

They should have beaten Stanford as well, missing a last second 43 yard field goal attempt that would have given WSU the one point victory. The Cougars' field goal kicker was 5 for 5 in the game prior to the deciding miss.

Their final conference game was a resounding 45-10 loss at Washington, though, a game I loved the surging Huskies in at home.

Can Washington State expect similar success in a loaded PAC-12 conference again?

Coaching

Little to report on here -- Pirate Mike Leach continues his revival of the Washington State offense with the super pass-heavy Air Raid scheme. It's Leach's 5th year on the job, and defensive coordinator Alex Grinch's 2nd.

Offense

The Cougar's passing game is all about efficiency -- throwing short passes for a high completion percentage over, and over, and over...One of their only deeper threats, WR Dom Williams, is gone. If the Cougars can't stretch the field effectively defenses will be able to cheat closer to the line of scrimmage, disrupting the timing of the passing game.

When the Cougars do hand off, their running backs achieve an excellent ypc average. But their passing game takes enough sacks (40 in 2015, tied for 10th most) that the Cougars' running game numbers end up being abysmal every year in Leach's system. Last year I ranked their run game 121st out of 128.

Washington State will be plugging in new starters on the left side of the offensive line, while returning the center and right side. 4 of their 5 backup offensive linemen are redshirt Freshman. Line play figures to be no better than last year really, and could be an outright liability with injuries to the returning starters.

With QB Falk having a full year of experience under his belt, I am giving WSU a +10% to their passing projections, in spite of the possible liabilities I mentioned. WSU's low yards per pass average makes the bump a fairly conservative one, though. I gave the Cougars a +10% bump to their rush projections as well, as there's nowhere to go but up on last year's numbers, and they return all of their running backs.

If the line play does improve for WSU this year, their overall offensive ratings could go up quite a bit, because they have the skill players just waiting for more room to work on the field.

Defense

The Cougar's defense graded out quite a bit higher than their offense last year. I will admit their offense is better than the main metrics I use indicate. Their high completion percentage extends drive and turns them into scores more successfully than other teams with below average yards per pass averages, and down near zero yards per carry averages.

The strength of Washington State's defense is pass defense, where they finished up ranking 31st best last year, good enough for 3rd in the PAC-12 behind UCLA (5th) and Washington (18th). The secondary should be solid again this year, returning 85% of their tackles.

The run defense is where things start to get dicey for the Cougars. I ranked them 70th last year, 7th best in the conference, and even one spot behind Cal's 69th ranked unit, even though they gave up 26 fewer rush yards per game than Cal.

Washington State loses their top two tacklers from last year's defensive line, making now a Sophomore Hercules Mata'afa the returning leader. Junior Daniel Ekuale will have to step up on the line this year, too.

The linebacking corps loses some depth and one of last year's top tacklers, Jeremiah Allison, but returns overall top tackler Peyton Pelluer.

While Washington State's pass defense rates to have another solid year, the rush defense also rates to have another mediocre year.

Crunched

Overall I've given the Washington State offense those 10% projection bumps, and then very small positive bumps and negative bumps to the pass and rush defenses, respectively.

Let's look at the 2016 schedule and see how the numbers play out, then.

After a week #1 FCS game the Cougars start off with a tough road trip to Boise State. I project the Broncos to win by almost a touchdown, but with all of the defensive turnovers that Boise State will be dealing with a Washington State win wouldn't surprise me at all.

After that comes a win at Idaho.

October will be a brutal month for Washington State, with home games against Oregon and UCLA, and road games at Stanford and Arizona State. I project losses in all four, with the game at Arizona State being the most winnable at almost a toss up.

November brings some schedule relief against what should be bottom half PAC-12 teams playing at Oregon State and Colorado, with road games at Arizona and Cal. I project the opposite of October here, with Washington State winning all four of these games.

The regular season ends with a home game against Washington. The Huskies are a deservedly hyped team this year, and I project them to beat Washington State in the 35-21 range.

I project Washington State to win 6.2 games with a 6-6 record this year. They have a win floor of 2 games and a win ceiling of 10. I can't see the Cougars really improving to the point where they're consistently better than the top PAC-12 teams they face on their schedule.

Let's say they do beat Boise State plus all of the other games they're supposed to win. That puts them at 7 wins. That means they still have to pull of one more upset of either Oregon, Stanford, UCLA, Arizona State or Washington to get to 8 wins. So by my projections you're looking at a succession of best case scenarios having to line up for the Cougars to go Over the 7.5 season wins line. If Washington State has a stumble or two like they did last year suddenly they could be looking at a 5 win season...or even less.

In sum it just seems much more likely that Washington State wins 7 games or less than 8 games or more in 2016, making the Under 7.5 season wins a solid value.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
15,087
Tokens
CRUNCHER provides some really good information to this forum. He does promote
picks but I will say he won money last year at near 55 percent.

Information for theRXForum is wonderful and appreciated.....We thank you Mr. C.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
2016 College Football Season Wins Wagers: Best of the Rest

Now that 5Dimes has numbers up for every FBS team at -110 juice, it's the perfect time to see which lines still have value and are worth putting a chunk down on. For tracking purposes I'm going with just a 1/2 unit flat for each play.

To recap, in write ups I've so far recommended plays on Toledo Over 6.5 (now 7.5 +120, still enough value for a 1/2 unit play), Navy Over 6.5 (7 at +130 just slightly worse), SDSU Over 8.5 (at 9 -155 juiced to the Over of far less value now, would probably pass), and Washington State Under 7.5.

Air Force Over 8.5 (-125). 8s were available at South Point earlier this summer, but we'll stick with the 5Dimes lines, even though it's much worse here. As long as Air Force's offensive line and QB play doesn't regress too much this season (up to 15-20% less in the passing game projections and 7-10% worse in the run projections are acceptable regressions for my projections) Air Force has a chance to run the table this season. Their defense was underrated last year, and returns almost 83% of its' tackles. The only toss up games for them I see are @USU, vs. Navy and vs. Boise. Games vs. UNM, @Army and @SJSU won't be gimmies, but I like AFA to win them by about a touchdown.

Appalachian State Over 8.5 (-110). The Mountaineers will start the season off with a loss at Tennessee, but then has a chance to scoop up a win in every remaining game. Vs. Miami and @Georgia Southern will be their two biggest tests, and if they drop those the buffer is gone. Fortunately I have APP favored by more than a touchdown in every other game on their schedule, so as long as they don't trip up @Akron or @Troy it should be good. APP loses about 1/2 of their receiving yards and a couple of key lineman, but even with some regression they should hit the 9 wins. Defensively they return 78.5% of their tackles.

Army Over 5 (-130). With two FCS games, a home game against Rice and a game @UNT I really like Army's win floor at 4 games, meaning they just have to grab one more to push the 5. Games @UTEP, vs. Buffalo vs. AFA are their best candidates for another win. This is Army's most veteran squad in several years, so the time is right for them to start winning some of the close games, instead of losing them all, lol. *Losing both their punter and kicker is not good, but I've factored that into the projections.

Cincinnati Under 7.5 (-130). CIN had a down year by HC Tuberville's standards, and I don't project much of a rebound this year. Their rush defense was 123rd last year. They do return a high 80.6% of their tackles, including some freshmen who saw a decent amount of playing time last year, so I do expect some improvement against the run. Offensively losing QB Kiel to injury for some games last year was detrimental to the team, in spite of QB Moore's record setting first game when thrust into action. The problem this year is that CIN only returns 16% of their receiving yards, their top running back, and both their starting tackles. Cincinnati should be competitive in all of their games, but I project them to go 3-4 in games decided by less than a touchdown and just a 5-7 record overall. I know I project Cincinnati to finish lower in the conference than just about everyone else, so their record at the end of the year will be one of the ones I'm most interested in.

Florida International Under 5.5 (-140). The Under has been hammered really hard but there's still some value here. FIU was pretty bad last year and I've them some small improvement bumps across the board for them. Still, it should be a rough year. They don't have a single lock game on their schedule, in no small part because they don't have an FCS opponent scheduled this season. I do project them to win 3 games vs. FAU, @UTEP and @CHAR. UTEP is projected to make a bigger bounce back than I'm giving them credit for, and if that's the case, that toss up game will instead be a 3-4 point loss on average. FIU does have some closely scheduled losses that I project, @ MASS (virtual coin flip) and vs UCF being the most winnable, and games vs. Louisiana Tech and @Old Dominion should be kept within a score. FIU will have to win pretty much all of their close games for the bet to lose, though, , so for a second straight year I like FIU to go Under on the season wins.

Fresno State Under 4 (EV). Fresno was a horror show at QB last year, a long bloody string of injuries and suspensions. You have to expect at least some kind of consistency from the position this year, if in jersey number only. As such, I've given them a 15% bump to passing projections. Other than that I'm not optimistic for their improving as they lose both starting tackles and center, workhouse RB Marteze Waller (55% of Fresno's rush yards), while returning a below average 58.2% of their defensive tackles. Fresno should get an FCS win and a probable home win late in the season against Hawaii, but that might just be it. Of the remaining games, I only project them to be less than a touchdown dog in one of them, in the final week at home against San Jose State.

Iowa State Over 3.5 (+115). Matt Campbell takes over as HC and inherits a pretty veteran squad whose only real issue is implementing a new starting offensive line. Rushing the ball was ISU's strength last year -- it will be interesting to see how they rank at year's end. ISU opens with a home game against FCS Northern Iowa in which they are just 7 point favorites, a smaller number than what I like them at against both San Jose State and Kansas. That should be three wins there, though they're not prohibitive favorites in any game this year. I put ISU's win ceiling at 6 games, as I think the only other winnable games on their schedule are vs. Kansas State (a 2 point win), @Texas Tech (a 1 point loss), and versus West Virginia (a 6 point loss). It would be cool to see the Cyclones pull off a bigger upset against one of the top half conference teams. I'm not banking on it for the play, but it would obviously be some great insurance.

Marshall Under 8.5 (+105). Marshall posted a 9-3 record last year, which was a disappointment for them considering their recent successes, yet they probably weren't even as good as that 9-3 record would indicate. While defensively they were still a pretty good team (2nd in the CUSA by my rankings, just two spots behind Louisiana Tech at 71st), their offense completely fell apart without QB Cato to lead them. They finally settled on freshman QB Litton, and with him they started to put up decent passing numbers. RB Johnson was hampered with injury for much of the year, and they really missed him. Johnson averaged 1.2 ypc more than anyone else on the team. Now he is gone, as well as another starting back, Remi Watson. The top two wide receivers, Davonte Allen and Deandre Reaves are gone as well. The good news for the Marshall offense, other than some returning experience at QB is a more mature offensive line. Defensively Marshall returns a below average 55.8% of their tackles. Marshall should lose vs. Louisville and @PITT, especially with those games being early in the season. Now they have only one more loss to give to still go Over 8.5. I project them to lose at Southern Miss., and to lose a squeaker at home against Western Kentucky in the final game. If they end up splitting those games, they still have toughish games at Old Dominion, Middle Tennessee and Florida International. ODU and MTU will be tougher outs than they were last year.

Nevada Under 6.5 wins (+110). I swear that earlier today when this line came out the juice on 7 wins was -160 on the Over and +120 on the Under! lol. Baited and hammered, it would seem. Nevada's offense will probably be a little bit better this year, but their already so-so defense stands to be much weaker up front, where they already struggled against the run. Outside of a game @Notre Dame, Nevada's schedule isn't overly tough. They get SDSU and USU at home, though I project them to lose both. Home games against Fresno and Wyoming should be wins. An FCS opener and a week #3 game versus Buffalo should be a couple more wins. Heck, I even think they'll pull off a squeaker at UNLV to close the season, as well as a tough roadie @ Hawaii. That's 6 wins, so I'm not working with a very large margin here, lol, but I still prefer the +110 on the Under 6.5 to the -155 on the Under 7, though 7 of course is the safer number at the stiffer price. Because I project a fair number of relatively close games, though, Nevada's win total is not necessarily focused on that 5-7 range where it's worth it to take the 7.

Purdue Under 4.5 wins (-110). Purdue has a brutal conference schedule this year, in that they play their strongest opponents at home, and their weaker (but still better than Purdue) opponents on the road. As such, I don't project Purdue to win any conference games, and in fact have them dogs betweeen 10.2 and 15.3 in 6 of those 9 games (plus 19 point dogs @NEB and 8 and 9 points dogs @MD and @ILL). Week #2 features what should be a close game versus Cincinnati, which is kinda' handy with Under bets on both teams. If Purdue has a saving grace this season, it's that they return a lot of production, well above average on both sides of the ball. Considering their poor play last year, though...

Rice Under 5.5 wins (+120). Rice was garbage last year. The only thing category they didn't finish worse than 100th in was pass offense, at 94th, and now QB Jackson is gone, with no great prospects behind. Rice also returns a lot of their defense, but it was a really bad defense, including having the worst pass defense in the FBS, by my rankings. If Rice somehow finds answers out of nowhere this year, I have their win ceiling set at 6 games, and their floor at 1 with an FCS game. I project Rice to go 4-1 in games decided by less than a touchdown, and that still only puts them at 5 wins. They will have to win literally every winnable game for the Under 5.5 to lose.

Louisiana Lafayette Under 6.5 wins (-110). ULL struggled to a 4-8 finish last year, and they didn't really deserve to be any better than that, ending up with my 8th worst ranked pass offense and 13th worst ranked pass defense. They were better in the trenches, but their offensive line gets younger, though it looks like center Eddie Gordon was granted an extra year or eligibility, which will help. Their offensive hopes will once again be pinned to RB Elijah McGuire. While I think they'll be about the same offensively, defensively I think ULL will improve. I've given them 8% projection bumps for both run and pass defense. ULL's problem this season will be that they'll be bumping up against a win ceiling that I've set for them 7 games. Games against Boise, App. State, @Georgia Southern, @Georgia and vs Arkansas State all project at double digit + losses. Their only sure win is the week #2 FCS opponent game. The fact of the matter is that I do project them to win all 6 of their remaining games, which would make this a losing bet, lol. But the other fact of the matter is that they only have to lose one of those games in which they project to be less than 10 point favorites in every one for the bet to win. Value, baby.

Southern Miss Over 8 wins (-145). I don't like the extra juice, but USM should be freerolling on 8 wins unless somehow the team performs notably worse with new head coach Jay Hopson. I like QB Mullens a lot and figure even at worse case he gives them a chance to win every conference game. Defensively they should be about where they were last year, which is much better than the average C-USA team. They'll lose at LSU, and slightly more than likely at Kentucky to open the season, but after that they're toughest game will be at home against Marshall.

Washington over 9 wins (-130). I project Washington to run the table, and only have them listed as less than 10 point favorites in 4 games, against Stanford, @ Oregon, @ Utah and vs. USC. I don't think they'll lose all 4.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
585
Tokens
Cruncher,

What's your take on Iowa? I see their number at 8 1/2. Looking at their schedule I see them starting 7-0 and only needing to go 2-3 to go over. Thoughts?
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
I think Iowa has a good shot at starting 8-0. I actually project them to win all 12 games this season, with the narrowest victories coming against Michigan (-1.1), @ Penn State (-1.3), @ Minnesota (-3.1), vs. Nebraska (-4.5) and vs. Wisconsin (-5.5). They do have a favorable schedule getting the two likeliest toughest teams, Michigan and Nebraska, at home. I think I project their games against Rutgers, NW and ILL to be a little closer than some do, at between 7-10 points. Adding up the % chances to win each game gives me a number of 8.8, so the value leans to the Over. Their defense returns an average number of tackles, and though their offense does lose RB Canzeri and half their receiving yards, QB Beathard should make their offensive production close to last year's. The juice on the Over 8.5 at 5Dimes is -135, so that ends up putting it really right on my number. As long as Iowa splits the closer projected games at 2-2 and is upset no more than once as 7+ point favorites the bet wins. So I'd lean that way, but I'm passing.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
53,682
Tokens
Mr./C........your thought's are a must, weekly and seasonal..........appreciate all your time and effort that you put into your thought's.........
BOL with all your action this season...........indy
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Thanks, Indy, always glad to see you stop by.

I entered the Under juice for the ISU play mistakenly. The juice is actually -135 for the Over.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,573,004
Members
100,866
Latest member
tt88myy
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com