The Player Owed Money From Royal Shares His Side...

Search

CAPNCRUNCH

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Reaction score
0
I miss the Shrink already! Is the General gone as well??:sad3: I feel like that young kid in 'Shane' crying out for Alan Ladd- "Come back Shrink, my Mom loves you, we all love you Shrink!" Scene fades to black.:howdy:
 
Fishhead

Fishhead

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Reaction score
12
hawkeye171 said:
Have heard Fish mention your name to me before. just moved to tampa last year(riverside) so maybe get together and :toast: . actually have spoken to General on phone via fish after fish spoke so highly of him. fish is definetly a good person to know for inside info on this business and he is honest to a fault. should know, been potential best man for all six of his wedding engagements. :drink:

Thanks,..........I think. :think2:
 

ChuckSims

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,477
Reaction score
0
Why don't these bettors that get stiffed, like the one getting stiffed by Royal Sports post here at The RX? You would think he would at least post a question like: "Can anyone steer me into an honest book"?
 

redpimp

New member
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
1,880
Reaction score
0
I found this website by following a link of a story about mybookie. (Especially being that those scumbugs some how got my email and were filling my bulk email folder daily)

BUt i was wondering. When something goes awry at a book like Royal, do the mods generally take it upon to post this news on every available sports forums
regardless of whether they may be construed as competitors?

Because if Major Wajor decides to do disgusting things like this, then we should counter by making sure every single forum we post at has their members fully kept abreast of such an issue!!!!
 

corporeal

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
I guess I'm the only one that thinks the Shrink misunderstood what Fishhead was saying?
 

CAPNCRUNCH

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Reaction score
0
corporeal said:
I guess I'm the only one that thinks the Shrink misunderstood what Fishhead was saying?
I think both of these 'heavyweights' knew exactly what each other was saying! :103631605
 

corporeal

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
i may just be off base, but from Ken's response (quoted below) it seems like he's reading it as "Kevin, I believe you, and I have mutual respect (...)" instead of "Kevin, I believe (we) have (a) mutual respect for one another (...)"
am i crazy? anyone? because Fishy-boy is obviously trying to help the player if you read that full post.
The Shrink said:
Fishhead said:
To Kevin King and player in question,

Kevin, I believe you and I have mutual respect for one another
Thanks,
-Fishhead-
Fishhead,

By saying this, then it appears you do not believe The General, The Player, or me.

You can't have it both ways, no matter how you spin it...

A very sad day because you posted this without ever contacting THE PLAYER, whose contact info I provided for you...

THE SHRINK
 
Fishhead

Fishhead

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Reaction score
12
corporeal said:
i may just be off base, but from Ken's response (quoted below) it seems like he's reading it as "Kevin, I believe you, and I have mutual respect (...)" instead of "Kevin, I believe (we) have (a) mutual respect for one another (...)"
am i crazy? anyone? because Fishy-boy is obviously trying to help the player if you read that full post.

Corporeal--

That is EXACTLY what occurred.

Was not suggesting in any way, shape, or form that I believed Kevin(or disbelieved for that matter because I heard nada from him personally on the matter).

Ken took it as you represented it, that I was believing Kevins story, when in fact I was saying that "I believe Kevin and myself have mutual respect for one another".

Ken has admitted taking it the wrong way and has personally apologized to me outside the forum for doing such.

I would also like to personally apologize to anybody else that took this as meaning the same, as without question yours trully could have made it much more 100% clear what I was trying to convey.

Again, if anybody here feels the need to converse with any of the mods here at the RX over any issue in the offshore world, they can contact us personally through any of our emails...........

fishhead@therx.com
wilheim@therx.com
dante@therx.com
admin@therx.com (Tech help)
lander@therx.com
robfunk@therx.com
ttinco@therx.com
journeyman@therx.com
bucsfan67@therx.com


Thanks,
-Fishhead-
 

ChuckSims

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,477
Reaction score
0
I am glad you straightened it out Fish as I took it as throwing the SHRINK under the bus. Royal Sports is bad news. SBR has them rated as a D-. One thing about SBR I have never disputed, when they rate a book a D or an F, it is for good reason. Stay the hell away from those books.
 

nepenthe

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
502
Reaction score
0
From TOW's report, seems as though Royal used the player's money to place losing bets on his behalf in order to make it look as though the player lost his remaining balance. My god.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,141,936
Messages
13,925,611
Members
104,829
Latest member
bronislaw
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com