The JM Plays (7-2 YTD)

[Sea-Urchin]

Today's play from JM is Toronto -6.

He recommends buying 3pts for your team, but I just bet them without buying any.

GLA!

May the wealth be with you. :money8:

 

[greenchris]

thanks sea urchin, i really appreciate you posting these plays. I have a buddy who has been following JM and making CASH.
Again...thanks!

 

[liftnbet]

if u dont mind me asking, whos JM
bol

 

[Sea-Urchin]

thanks sea urchin, i really appreciate you posting these plays. I have a buddy who has been following JM and making CASH.
Again...thanks!

Glad to help out a fellow gambler like many great cappers here share their systems.

GL.

 

[Sea-Urchin]

if u dont mind me asking, whos JM
bol

Here's JM

http://www.sportsprofits.com/

but don't sign up with his program.

 

[kirancheedi]

Do u really think that he hits 97% with his nba plays and btw thx for posting them for us

 

[Ganasa]

he hits the 97% of the series (A+B+C)...

 

[Sea-Urchin]

Do u really think that he hits 97% with his nba plays and btw thx for posting them for us

My record with him is 7-2 so far since tailing his plays. He recommends to buy 3pts, but I never did.

 

[greenchris]

Do u really think that he hits 97% with his nba plays and btw thx for posting them for us

from what i've seen, that number is accurate

 

[Lrrr]

My record with him is 7-2 so far since tailing his plays. He recommends to buy 3pts, but I never did.

I think you would have went 9-0 if you bought the three points right?

 

[greenchris]

I think you would have went 9-0 if you bought the three points right?

correct

 

[thesandman1]

This is the first I've seen of this guy and don't know if he is for real or not. Since his Toronto -3 play lost tonight, does that make his NBA record that he says was 24-0 before Toronto lost, now 24-1. If not, then what am I missing.


Regardless, the real reason I would question if this guy is for real, is when I saw this list, in green, of 6 plays from one of his customers. Anyone here who knows how off shore books operate can see that the six plays below are NOT plays that were made. Can you see what the problem is. Play 1 and Play 2 have the same bet ID number. Every bet made is a separate bet and each one has a different ID number. Someone made up the plays and made a mistake giving both plays the same ID, 21595. Also, if the ID numbers were correct, this off shore took in a total of just 33 bets from July 28, 2007 to August 4, 2007. That's an average of 4 plays per day. Do you believe that.




7-day betting performance from my first sportsbook:

 

[sonnycam]

those bet IDs are only partially displayed. Look at the second one from the top. You can clearly see a number following the last digit. maybe a 2?
still, no idea why he would delete the last couple of digits.

 

[greenchris]

This is the first I've seen of this guy and don't know if he is for real or not. Since his Toronto -3 play lost tonight, does that make his NBA record that he says was 24-0 before Toronto lost, now 24-1. If not, then what am I missing.


Regardless, the real reason I would question if this guy is for real, is when I saw this list, in green, of 6 plays from one of his customers. Anyone here who knows how off shore books operate can see that the six plays below are NOT plays that were made. Can you see what the problem is. Play 1 and Play 2 have the same bet ID number. Every bet made is a separate bet and each one has a different ID number. Someone made up the plays and made a mistake giving both plays the same ID, 21595. Also, if the ID numbers were correct, this off shore took in a total of just 33 bets from July 28, 2007 to August 4, 2007. That's an average of 4 plays per day. Do you believe that.

It's a 3 game chase system, so the Toronto game should not be included in the record until it wins or after it loses 3 times. So far this season I think it's only gone to game B (the second game) once, but not sure. It has yet to go to the third game.

 

[Sea-Urchin]

It's a 3 game chase system, so the Toronto game should not be included in the record until it wins or after it loses 3 times. So far this season I think it's only gone to game B (the second game) once, but not sure. It has yet to go to the third game.

Green, this is what I received from JM in my email:

"We have won 24 out of 24 series, and 21 out of those 24 series were
all won at the very first [A] betting level! We've won every single
bet so far.

And even more incredible is the fact that we've now won 10 straight
[A] bets in a row. That's a flawless 100% win rate on the [A] bets
alone. And you know what? The [A] bets are the ones that have the
least chances of winning of all! If we're winning 100% of the time
on the [A] bets, it's beginning to get impossibly hard to imagine
what exactly it's going to take for us to lose an entire series!"