Congrats on the 2-0 night!
I make my own numbers and plays, but for bettors who don't handicap themselves I recommend fades.
In my post I explained it like this:
1) The majority of sports bettors lose. Estimates have it as high as 95-98% of bettors (except on the internet of course, where everybody's a "winner".)
2) The majority of forum visitors look for a winner to tail.
See the disconnect between the two?
People are looking for the needle in the haystack rather than the easier find - a loser worth fading.
I gave some tips on how to spot the best guys to fade (guys who cheat on their record, or post a record but then stop, guys who shave points off the line, always getting -2' or -2 when the line is -3 everywhere, etc.)
It's not hard, they're all over the internet. Bettors just need to take off their blinders and start seeing reality instead of what they want to believe.
Best fade? As of Friday, Sept 15, 6-21, 22%.
Yes, 22%. Or as I posted, the "approximately 70% anyone can be hitting."
I also posted a warning about jumping on trends, so is it too late, what's the updated numbers on this?
After going 7-9, Saturday, Sept 16, and 0-2 last night, the current record is 13-32, 28% or a 72% fade.
Based on his $100 per unit that's a loss of $7,565, or more than 75 units in just a few weeks.
Bettors who come here looking for winners to tail - do you think you can easily find a guy hitting 72%?
No. They're here and there but rare, and over the long term - never. It's easier to find a loser to fade.
My numbers may be off a unit or two but if they are it's not by much.
Most don't know this because his record magically disappeared.
Instead of looking for winners, followers should be looking for losers to tail.
Grab a pen and paper, do a little research, and in a very short time you'll figure it out.
It's much easier, right here right now.
I make my own numbers and plays, but for bettors who don't handicap themselves I recommend fades.
In my post I explained it like this:
1) The majority of sports bettors lose. Estimates have it as high as 95-98% of bettors (except on the internet of course, where everybody's a "winner".)
2) The majority of forum visitors look for a winner to tail.
See the disconnect between the two?
People are looking for the needle in the haystack rather than the easier find - a loser worth fading.
I gave some tips on how to spot the best guys to fade (guys who cheat on their record, or post a record but then stop, guys who shave points off the line, always getting -2' or -2 when the line is -3 everywhere, etc.)
It's not hard, they're all over the internet. Bettors just need to take off their blinders and start seeing reality instead of what they want to believe.
Best fade? As of Friday, Sept 15, 6-21, 22%.
Yes, 22%. Or as I posted, the "approximately 70% anyone can be hitting."
I also posted a warning about jumping on trends, so is it too late, what's the updated numbers on this?
After going 7-9, Saturday, Sept 16, and 0-2 last night, the current record is 13-32, 28% or a 72% fade.
Based on his $100 per unit that's a loss of $7,565, or more than 75 units in just a few weeks.
Bettors who come here looking for winners to tail - do you think you can easily find a guy hitting 72%?
No. They're here and there but rare, and over the long term - never. It's easier to find a loser to fade.
My numbers may be off a unit or two but if they are it's not by much.
Most don't know this because his record magically disappeared.
Instead of looking for winners, followers should be looking for losers to tail.
Grab a pen and paper, do a little research, and in a very short time you'll figure it out.
It's much easier, right here right now.
"Based on his $100 per unit that's a loss of $7,565, or more than 75 units in just a few weeks."
Clarification - obviously 13-32 at $100 per unit would not be down $7,565.
The dollar loss is because the units wagered varies, sometimes by as much as a factor of ten, as amateurs, losers, and chasers tend to do.
Clarification - obviously 13-32 at $100 per unit would not be down $7,565.
The dollar loss is because the units wagered varies, sometimes by as much as a factor of ten, as amateurs, losers, and chasers tend to do.
