Seattle
abv avg QB
abv avg RB
avg TE
avg WR's none in the top 10
good solid Defense
good coach
prone to turnovers
New England
one of the best QB ever
abv avg RB
one of, if not the best TE
abv avg WR in the top 10
abv avg WR in the top 10
abv avg WR
good solid defense
great coach one of the best ever
great ball control team, moving the chains
very few turnovers
I really just like what the pats have to offer, bottom line...I believe New England Wins
Just win....!
above average is a generalization, meaning better than average. It says Both backs are good and better then most. Not comparing to each other. Same as defenses both good .. I was pointing out what I believe are the strengths for each team and where I percieve their weaknesses. Sorry you didn't catch that.each team has "abv avg RB", and "good solid def"
You're telling me Blount is the equivalent of Lynch? No, he isn't.
The NE defense is the equivalent of the Seattle defense? That isn't true either.
Prone to turnovers? Off of 1 game? Really? Seattle is far from a turnover machine.
"I really just like what the pats have to offer, bottom line...I believe New England Wins"
You should have just said this., and left out the analysis.
above average is a generalization, meaning better than average. It says Both backs are good and better then most. Not comparing to each other. Same as defenses both good .. I was pointing out what I believe are the strengths for each team and where I percieve their weaknesses. Sorry you didn't catch that.