The Big 10, arguably one of the best college football conferences in America, has had a rough time trying to impact the outcome of these play-off games and the ultimate National Championship with only one team gaining a coveted spot in the "final 4" back in 2016 and proceeded to get run off the field by Clemson, 31-0 in the semi's. Why is this ? We've heard all the arguments many of which may have merit but others...not so sure.
Listed below are a few:
1. The Big 10 teams beat-up on each other leaving too much scar-tissue come selection time (this year was a good example of that, the Buckeyes, the conference champions ended up (#6) according to the committee).
2. Those "Southern Schools" never have to play in the sleet and cold during their conference schedules which allows them to retain more "vinegar" with fewer injuries for the end of the year stretch.
3. Those "Southern Schools? play "soft" out-of-conference schedules that allows them to end-up with 12-13 wins.
4. The "politics" of it all: Those Southern Institutions of higher learning must have some "deep state connection" with the committee that the schools north of the Mason-Dixon Line haven't been able to figure out to date.
I'm certain there are more reasons why the Big-10 has been coming up short during the past 3 years with some legitimacy but Adding Rutgers and Maryland to the Conference make-up probably hasn't contributed to leagues prowess compared to the SEC adding Missouri and Texas A & M.
Listed below are a few:
1. The Big 10 teams beat-up on each other leaving too much scar-tissue come selection time (this year was a good example of that, the Buckeyes, the conference champions ended up (#6) according to the committee).
2. Those "Southern Schools" never have to play in the sleet and cold during their conference schedules which allows them to retain more "vinegar" with fewer injuries for the end of the year stretch.
3. Those "Southern Schools? play "soft" out-of-conference schedules that allows them to end-up with 12-13 wins.
4. The "politics" of it all: Those Southern Institutions of higher learning must have some "deep state connection" with the committee that the schools north of the Mason-Dixon Line haven't been able to figure out to date.
I'm certain there are more reasons why the Big-10 has been coming up short during the past 3 years with some legitimacy but Adding Rutgers and Maryland to the Conference make-up probably hasn't contributed to leagues prowess compared to the SEC adding Missouri and Texas A & M.