Superbowl

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,961
Tokens
In the cc round we found out stats and trends stomped a mud hole in "wants", but the 20pt system continued to roll as it was designed to do. (more on that in a bit)
this years playoffs have been lined razor sharp by oddsmakers keeping bettors on the edge of thief seats until the final gun in the majority of the games...I don't see that changing.
first let's roll out the trends...
**the dog is 9-3 ats in the last 12 sb's (Seattle)
**the sb team who had the smaller margin of victory in thier cc win have won 8 of the last 12 sb's su (Seattle)
**the sb team who scored less but allowed more in their cc win have went 5-0 ats s 88. (Seattle)

all trends say seattle, the math however (20pt system), says different...sorta.
the #'s for the teams are sea+21 and den-1.
the team with the lower# has went 7-1 su and 8-0 ats s 05 with an 11-3-2 ats mark s 96.
there is although a trend in the trend with this, since 03 there have been 5 sb's where the participants #'s have seen a 17+pt difference, in these games the dog covered 4 times and 4 of the games were decided by 4 or less (3 by 3pts).

now taking into account the lines makers accuracy this year, what the trends say, and what will appease the 20pt system, there can only be one outcome..a Denver win by 1pt.
seattle up late by 2, a heroic Peyton manning drive late, followed by a game winning field goal by guess who...

i'll more up before Sunday if I can get this new pad working by then.

GAME.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
616
Tokens
It took me a couple minutes to get my head around that 3rd bullet. I look forward to your additional thoughts.
Thanks. Do you follow any other sports as close as you do the NFL? I've read you for years but only remember NFL.
Thanks and GLA.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
2,940
Tokens
Hey game, kinda pricey, but what do you think of this prop?

Props Football 1351 Same team wont lead at end of all 4 qtrs -195*
 

New member
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
155
Tokens
Love Your work but think about this stat:


"THERE HAS ONLY BEEN (1) ONE S/B THAT HAS BEEN DECIDED BY ""LESS"" THAN A F/G"

_And that was the 1991 game , which was a Final score of 20-19



THATS ONE outta the LAST 47 Years that a Team WON by LESS than a F/G


IM NOT BUYING THE ONE POINT DENV OR SEATTLE THING.....AT ALL
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,961
Tokens
Love Your work but think about this stat:


"THERE HAS ONLY BEEN (1) ONE S/B THAT HAS BEEN DECIDED BY ""LESS"" THAN A F/G"

_And that was the 1991 game , which was a Final score of 20-19



THATS ONE outta the LAST 47 Years that a Team WON by LESS than a F/G


IM NOT BUYING THE ONE POINT DENV OR SEATTLE THING.....AT ALL

So a 1pt win is possible....I'm not guaranteeing it and I'm not saying anyone will win by 60...teams have won by almost every imaginable number at one time or another from 1 to 45...and some were even repeated...go figure, a Superbowl team to beat another Superbowl team by the same amount of pts more than once...what are the odds?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
142
Tokens
I have been saying all week that Den wins buy 1pt or Sea wins based on the line movement. Books are inviting DEN money from -1.5 or higher and they are reluctant to move on -3 because this would invite SEA money...which they dont want. Been following the vegas shops line movement all week and there has been some major line manipulation at the wynn all week Den going from -2.5 to .-5 to .5 back to Den -2.5. This has happend 7-8 times throughout the week so someone with deep pockets is playing Sea to get Den at -.5 only to hammer Den the other way. Some sharp wants DEN at -.5.

Just my theory to support your opinion on Den by 1
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,572,988
Members
100,865
Latest member
dinnnadna
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com