Guys, you may think this is silly, why focus on an obvious clown (is he? I have yet to hear much proving Stu is ass-clown), but this is key to this forum. If Stu is a joke, which he likely is, does that mean Marc Lawrence or Northcoast or XXXX is better? If not, why bother with this sports service forum? If they're all bad, why bother? To fade? Really? Presumably it's believed some are better than others, no? But who is better, and why?
As much as Stu seems to be a joke, he's been doing it for 40 years, no joke. So either he's actually good, or he is a consummate con man, able to con people out of their $$$ for decades. Which is it? And if he is a con man, that means who isn't? Ferringo? Maddux?