SoonerBS Thoughts

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Guys, I have been reading and keeping up on a lot of NCAA college football news and transactions in the offseason, but I am not as active on posting thoughts this year as I have been in past offseason years. I put a lot of time in on my golf game now and golf every day, so I don't have the time to interact on these sites like I use to.

With that being said, I have put together some info I would like to pass on and will have some more thoughts as the Fall camps progress, so I have started this thread to put it all in. First things first, I wanted to post some of my favorite sites for finding info. I watch these sites regularly.

If you have an ESPN Insider subscription (and if you do not, you should), here is some important links that you should monitor regularly. One of them is the complete info from the annual magazine, "Blue Ribbon Yearbook."

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=6746034

http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/features/rumors#4242

http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/blog?name=feldman_bruce

If you guys have a copy of Phil Steele's college preview and use it heavily like I do to find out info on rosters, here is a link of players that our now off the teams for various reasons. It is good to have this info so you can evaluate returning starters and loss of talent that is CURRENT.

http://www.philsteele.com/miscpages/...or_to_ssn.html

Of course, you want to bookmark this site, not only for the preseason info, but for the whole season. Keepers does a great deal of research and has a tool that evaluates the loss of talent to each team and the amount of talent retained. Also, they have their current power rankings up for this season. These power rankings get adjusted each week as the season goes along. Explore this site, you'll love the info.

http://home.comcast.net/~keepersfootball/site/


coach2.gif
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Here are some teams I am watching for the season that have caught my early attention:

1.) Texas -- I think that Texas will right the ship this year. They are getting virtually no respect by anyone in the nation which is unusual for the Longhorns who the very name has long time struck fear in the hearts of their opponents. My reasons for wanting to bet on them this season:

a.) I really like the assistant coaches positions Mack has assembled. He needed to hit a home run with his choices and I think has has. I've always liked Major Appelwhite even ever since he was a player, he just has a knack of winning (thank you Mack for thinking Chrissy Simms was better than Appelwhite all those years). Him being combined with Bryan Harsin of Boise State should bring a lot of new life to this Texas offense that was badly missing a lack of imagination last season. Whenever you don't have great players like Vince Young and Colt McCoy supplying imagination with their athletic skills at QB, you need to rely on offensive scheme. Both Appelwhite and Harsin have proven they have this ability. I also like the addition of Manny Diaz as defensive coordinator. Texas already has the athletes it needs to be a solid defense and now they will get a defense that is both simple and aggressive with Diaz's schemes.

b.) Texas finally recruited a RB that will likely follow the shoes of former marquee players in superstar billing. They have not had a decent RB since Jamaal Charles left. That will likely change with Brown if he remains healthy and I look for him to take all the time away from Fozzy Whitaker this season.

c.) The defense is loaded with talent and experience. Again, with the schemes Diaz is bringing, I don't think it is going to demand the players to take a lot of time learning what to do. I look for a much more solid defense this season.

d.) The QB job has been opened up for competition this year which is a very good thing. I am still not sure that Texas has a REALLY good QB out of the 4 players vying for the job, but if they can find one guy who is sound, smart and will not turn the ball over a lot, the offensive schemes will provide enough offense to where the QB will not be expected to be a heavy producer.

WEAKNESS -- last season, the Longhorns were seriously weak on the offensive line. This year, they have two of those starters back and the rest are largely inexperienced. The good news is that they are talented athletes, but lighter than standard offensive linemen. This could be good though with a tricky offensive scheme. The success of the offense may weigh heavily on how quick this line grows up and comes together.


2.) Colorado State -- CSU could be one of those sleeper teams that wins you money because they fly under the radar. Last season they had a 3-9 record, but that was largely because of their inexperience at all positions. This season, they bring back 14 starters and 48 lettermen. In the 4 years that Fairchild has been the HC at CSU, this is by far his best team yet. He brings back a Sophomore that had the highest passing efficiency of a D1 QB ever as a freshmen last season at 65%! He has a solid offensive line in front of him, good receivers, and a RB who is a UCLA transfer with much more talent than what he was allowed to show last season.

Defensively they were riddled with injuries and never allowed to get into the flow of the season. The good news is that that allowed players to get a lot of experience they might not have got otherwise. Do not judge them by last year's numbers. If they stay healthy, this will be a solid defense this season.

Another reason to like this team is because they have a very solid special teams unit and return them all this season.

They also have a very favorable schedule this year. Hopefully Vegas will keep them under the radar for a long time this season.


3.) Notre Dame -- I'm anxious to see what the O/U is going to be set at for season wins on Notre Dame by Vegas. I seriously think Notre Dame has a good chance to go 12-0 this season. The real questionable game to me is the season ending game at Stanford. Call my optimism a "faith in a Brian Kelly coached team," more than anything, but I really see a good trend going on with this team. Despite losing his starting QB last year midway through the season, Kelly still managed to get production off his bench and coach ND to an 8-5 season which ended in a big win against Miami in the Sun Bowl.

Crist will return as the starter this year at QB, but if he goes down again ND is loaded at back up. The offensive line is solid, the RB averaged 5.3 ypc last year and the receivers are all back. Defensively, they only allowed 20 ppg last year and they recruited very well on this side of the ball in the offseason. The defense should only get better, which again is what you would expect with a Brian Kelly team.

I don't look for ND to fly in under the radar this year, and the best bet all year may be the season O/U wins, but they will certainly bear some serious watching this season. No one is talking about them winning the National Championship, and yet, if they put in an undefeated regular season, what do you do with them? They obviously play a good enough schedule to be put into the NC game. This could get interesting.


4.) Idaho -- don't laugh, yet. One will look at this year's team and say, "they're starting QB of years past, Nathan Enderle, is gone and they only return 4 starters off their prolific offense of the last two years." But, the cupboard is not bare. Brian Reader will be starting at QB and he is a senior who played in 10 games last season and went 42 of 71 for 60% throwing the ball. They will also have Arizona State transfer RB, Ryan Bass playing who was a PS #4 and has a very physical body to go with speed. He will likely make a big impact in the WAC this year. Last year's offensive line was inexperienced and it showed up in some games. The good news is that several players got good playing time. Steele shows 8 out of the best 10 linemen from last season's team will be back this year. Experience is a big plus on offensive lines.

Now, side this little considered offensive information with what we can expect on Defense -- a defense that improved by 8 points allowed last season returns 8 starters! Allowing only 28 ppg in the WAC conference is pretty sound defense. They not only have starters back, but they are deep in experience with some good JC recruitment as well.

Guys, this is a team that will definitely fly under the radar and should win us some money this season.


5.) Houston -- there are several reasons to like Houston this year: Case Keenum is back after missing last season due to injury, Kevin Sumlin is a good coach and you can always expect his teams to do well, this team is coming off an unusual 5-7 season mostly due to injuries, they went 3-9 ATS last year which usually means a rebound year in this category, and they bring back a lot of experience with 12 starters and 52 lettermen.

Offensively, Houston has a great corps of skilled players as they usually do. Case Keenum, if he remains healthy, will likely lead the nation in passing statistics. Defensivley, well, even though they bring back a lot of experience, they are still a CUSA team and no one hardly plays defense in CUSA.

There will likely be a lot of scoring with this team this year, so if the lines are decent, they could be a good bet all season.
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
The Over/Under in Vegas at the Hilton for Notre Dame is 8.5 -130, or was when I took the over. I think that the over is the best play on the board. I cannot see Notre Dame losing more than 3 games with the schedule that they play.

I agree with your assessment of Colorado State. This team deserves watching when the lines come out in the early games. There is no reason why Colorado State can not start the season at 4-1 and finish with 6 or more wins. I am looking to play on them early, especially if they are a dog.

While Texas should improve, you still have to remember that they are by far, the most hated team in the Big 12-2. They also go to Missouri and finish the season on the road to A&M and in Dallas against Baylor. Then there is the Oklahoma teams. The best test may be the BYU game at home. Texas opened up at -7.5 at the Nugget as one of their "games of the year". That may be too many points to give a team trying to prove themselves as an Independent, and who returns 9 starters to their offense.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
BS...So are you saying your on your way to becoming the oldest member of the Hooters Tour or are you prepping for the Senior Tour in a few years? All I can say is I hope you've improved since last time I kicked your ass on the golf course. Maybe we can have a rematch in a couple months when this El Nina heatwave is out of here. I had a little bout with the heat a couple weeks ago and have decided to hang up my spikes until sometime in September when this heat moves out of here. I did finish up the golf league season a few weeks ago with an 80 at Westwood. So I'm quitting with good thoughts. But that's a pretty easy ego building course. About like that Purcell cow pasture you play....By the way I agree with most of your thoughts here since I already have a couple of these teams on my top 2011 ATS teams list.
 

RX Old-Timer
Joined
Sep 21, 2000
Messages
7,708
Tokens
BS,
I have Idaho as my WAC co-champ as they get Fresno and Hawaii at home. Key to Fresno game will be not getting too beat up by Aggies the week before. The end season with trip to Nevada. QB Reader's got substantial playing time prior to last year and was exceptional. They might have the biggest OL in the WAC this year.
Agree with you on UH. Sumlin's a top notch coach and their season imploded when they lost their top 2 QBs to season ending injuries. They ended up playing a RS Freshman and a true freshman.
I'm wait and see on UT. They've assembled a superstar coaching staff but I want to see their OL develop a bit more and keep their QB's upright. Then I want to see a QB make plays.

WinOne!!
 

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
7,041
Tokens
Seems as if you are right on (as usual) with Texas BS. Gotta remember though that the OL Coach is one of those new coaches that has been hired. The entire philosophy has been switched on the OL. And it goes from extremely hard-to-learn zone blocking schemes to a new, maul-the-man-in-front-of-you scheme, which will help immensely. Mack McWhorter and Greg Davis should be jailed for stealing money from UT last year. They were deplorable. McWhorter has been very bad (and old) the last 5 years actually. This is the area I look forward to watching most this year, as Mason Walters, Tre Hopkins and Tray Allen are all 5*'s and will play in the NFL, as will Taylor Doyle and Dom Espinosa. Again, the talent is there, I'm just hoping the new coach from Auburn (Stacy Searles), will have these guys play mean and mad.

I know I carry zero merit after last year, but I think you're right on. 8 wins is low.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Texas is always stockpiled on their roster. So you never expect them to fall very far. I think they found out last year that you can no longer just phone in a 10 win season in college football like they have in the past. It takes work now to beat what used to be the sure wins on their schedule like Texas A&M, OSU and Missouri. No matter how we feel about their OL play or QB play coming into this season, you have to remember that relative to the rest of the conference, Texas has more talent (raw & otherwise) than any team in the Big 12. My feeling is with Texas stumbling as badly as they did last year with only two Big 12 wins, a quick fix is going to be very difficult. But also keep in mind that an 8 or 9 win season would be considered just "average" for a program like this. As always I could care less how many games Texas wins. My concern is how many they cover. And I think they'll do well this season. First, with so much negative press they've had going into this season, they could find themselves being the dogs in as many as 4 or 5 games this year. And I think we'll at least see some tight lines in as many as 6 of their games. We should have some nice betting opportunities. Also keep in mind that with a new coaching staff and system, Texas will have the advantage of the element of surprise to spring on the conference since coaches won't have the luxury to be able to prepare for the same old simple Greg Davis offense. Texas will still be in the learning stages, and I don't expect them to play well every week. But I definitely think the Whorns have some betting value for the first time since their 2005 NC season.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
The Over/Under in Vegas at the Hilton for Notre Dame is 8.5 -130, or was when I took the over. I think that the over is the best play on the board. I cannot see Notre Dame losing more than 3 games with the schedule that they play.

I agree with your assessment of Colorado State. This team deserves watching when the lines come out in the early games. There is no reason why Colorado State can not start the season at 4-1 and finish with 6 or more wins. I am looking to play on them early, especially if they are a dog.

While Texas should improve, you still have to remember that they are by far, the most hated team in the Big 12-2. They also go to Missouri and finish the season on the road to A&M and in Dallas against Baylor. Then there is the Oklahoma teams. The best test may be the BYU game at home. Texas opened up at -7.5 at the Nugget as one of their "games of the year". That may be too many points to give a team trying to prove themselves as an Independent, and who returns 9 starters to their offense.

BS,
I have Idaho as my WAC co-champ as they get Fresno and Hawaii at home. Key to Fresno game will be not getting too beat up by Aggies the week before. The end season with trip to Nevada. QB Reader's got substantial playing time prior to last year and was exceptional. They might have the biggest OL in the WAC this year.
Agree with you on UH. Sumlin's a top notch coach and their season imploded when they lost their top 2 QBs to season ending injuries. They ended up playing a RS Freshman and a true freshman.
I'm wait and see on UT. They've assembled a superstar coaching staff but I want to see their OL develop a bit more and keep their QB's upright. Then I want to see a QB make plays.

WinOne!!

I'm glad to see you guys agree on these teams.
beer.gif
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
BS...So are you saying your on your way to becoming the oldest member of the Hooters Tour or are you prepping for the Senior Tour in a few years? All I can say is I hope you've improved since last time I kicked your ass on the golf course. Maybe we can have a rematch in a couple months when this El Nina heatwave is out of here. I had a little bout with the heat a couple weeks ago and have decided to hang up my spikes until sometime in September when this heat moves out of here. I did finish up the golf league season a few weeks ago with an 80 at Westwood. So I'm quitting with good thoughts. But that's a pretty easy ego building course. About like that Purcell cow pasture you play....By the way I agree with most of your thoughts here since I already have a couple of these teams on my top 2011 ATS teams list.

I just have my scheduling adjusted to where I can play a lot more so I do -- nearly every day of the week. I play early in the morning because I don't like this heat either. I have my handicap down to an 8 now and am working to make it lower. It is tougher to improve your game once you start golfing in the 70s more consistently. I agree though, the rematch needs to be played some time after things cool down.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Seems as if you are right on (as usual) with Texas BS. Gotta remember though that the OL Coach is one of those new coaches that has been hired. The entire philosophy has been switched on the OL. And it goes from extremely hard-to-learn zone blocking schemes to a new, maul-the-man-in-front-of-you scheme, which will help immensely. Mack McWhorter and Greg Davis should be jailed for stealing money from UT last year. They were deplorable. McWhorter has been very bad (and old) the last 5 years actually. This is the area I look forward to watching most this year, as Mason Walters, Tre Hopkins and Tray Allen are all 5*'s and will play in the NFL, as will Taylor Doyle and Dom Espinosa. Again, the talent is there, I'm just hoping the new coach from Auburn (Stacy Searles), will have these guys play mean and mad.

I know I carry zero merit after last year, but I think you're right on. 8 wins is low.

Texas is always stockpiled on their roster. So you never expect them to fall very far. I think they found out last year that you can no longer just phone in a 10 win season in college football like they have in the past. It takes work now to beat what used to be the sure wins on their schedule like Texas A&M, OSU and Missouri. No matter how we feel about their OL play or QB play coming into this season, you have to remember that relative to the rest of the conference, Texas has more talent (raw & otherwise) than any team in the Big 12. My feeling is with Texas stumbling as badly as they did last year with only two Big 12 wins, a quick fix is going to be very difficult. But also keep in mind that an 8 or 9 win season would be considered just "average" for a program like this. As always I could care less how many games Texas wins. My concern is how many they cover. And I think they'll do well this season. First, with so much negative press they've had going into this season, they could find themselves being the dogs in as many as 4 or 5 games this year. And I think we'll at least see some tight lines in as many as 6 of their games. We should have some nice betting opportunities. Also keep in mind that with a new coaching staff and system, Texas will have the advantage of the element of surprise to spring on the conference since coaches won't have the luxury to be able to prepare for the same old simple Greg Davis offense. Texas will still be in the learning stages, and I don't expect them to play well every week. But I definitely think the Whorns have some betting value for the first time since their 2005 NC season.

Guys, I really think that Texas' season could ride on the shoulders of how fast Brown transitions from high school to college football. If he comes in and pulls an "Adrian Peterson" for Texas, it could be a real successful season. The running game has been nearly non-existent. Texas needs a good running game to take some focus and pressure off the QB.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
15,087
Tokens
Great point SBS....same applies to Georgia with their freshman runningback. Lots of pressure on these young kids. I personally think Texas will be a player in the conference this year. Just to many people writing them off.

Hope your golf game is better than mine...been playing forty years and still my game sucks. Fun with great friends is what I enjoy....even though I lose most of the time.

Glad to see you jumping back in....we need someone to handle your friend GoSooners.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
8,810
Tokens
Good thoughts. Idaho is interesting and I will certainly be paying attention to their lines. Is there anyone on this forum that specializes in those teams (WAC)?

I also agree that Texas will improve...as well the should. With the talent they have, they should right the ship very quickly.

I really don't think ND will surprise anyone. They are very well coached and have enough talent to be a top ten team....

---
 

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
377
Tokens
Speaking of the WAC:

Take a look at the UNDER 8 wins for NV.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Speaking of the WAC:

Take a look at the UNDER 8 wins for NV.
This is one I'm looking at if for no other reason I don't see Nevada starting the season out any better than 1-3. They would have to really go some with no room for error for the rest of the schedule to make that 8 wins. But maybe the biggest reason I like the under with teams like Nevada is because their hopes and dreams were REALIZED in 2010 by winning (tied for 1st) the WAC and finally defeating Boise St. No matter how good of a coach Ault is, human nature says to be fat, happy and rest on your laurels in 2011. Another team that loses a lot of players and falls into the same category as Nevada is TCU. I'm seriously thinking about taking the under with them too despite their easy schedule. Their hopes and dreams were realized in 2010. Patterson had built the team up for years to peak in 2010. He had his star QB Dalton, who took them from 8-5 in 2007 to 11-2 in 2008 to 12-1 in 2009 to 13-0 and a Rose Bowl win in 2010. It was MISSION ACCOMPLISED in in 2010 and now it's time to rest. I realize Patterson is a great coach. But I would be very surprised if him and his players who are leftover from that team come out with the same intensity and focus that we saw in 2010. They've basically proved they belong with the elite. And now they are a lame duck MWC team that is in limbo and waiting to go to a BCS conference next year. The only question is if you think TCU has gotten to the point that they can just pull 10 wins or more out of their ass at the drop of a hat. I'm about ready to put a little moola down that they can't do it.
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
Nevada Under 8 wins is a dangerous play IMO. They start out with 4 away games, and I agree that a 1-3 start seems to be in the cards. Nevada then plays 6 of their remaining 8 games at home, with away games at New Mexico State and at Utah State. They would have to lose two of those games to go Under 8. That is a bit too "iffy" for me. Both Fresno State and Hawaii go to Nevada.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
BD...I wouldn't say it's so much of a dangerous play as it is a potential tie bet. I don't think we can call it a given that Nevada will defeat both Hawaii, Fresno and even La Tech at home. I'm betting they lose one of those games. Especially given that Nevada lost to Hawaii last year, and beat Fresno by just a point. And that was with Kaepernick and a better running game than they'll have this season. I don't like it when a team loses a player that they've depended on so much over the last few years to win those close games in the clutch. They no longer have a player they can trust in the clutch, plus the fact that even last year Nevada didn't have the defense to stop fellow WAC title contenders Hawaii or Fresno. And this year loses a ton of players off that unit. I haven't made this bet yet because I would much prefer an uneven number like an 8.5. But it wouldn't surprise me at all given the circumstances of coming off their greatest season ever, that with only 12 returning starters Nevada takes a good size drop.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
377
Tokens
Thanks for explaining some of the angles GoSooners.
I think at worst this bet pushes...I havent bet it yet, but, will likely pull the trigger this weekend depending on the line I can get.

This is the way I see it:

Sat, Sept 10 @Oregon L
Sat, Sept 17 @San Jose State W
Sat, Sept 24 @Texas Tech L
Sat, Oct 1 @Boise State L
Sat, Oct 8 vsUNLV W
Sat, Oct 15 vsNew Mexico W
Sat, Oct 22 vsFresno State ???
Sat, Oct 29 @New Mexico State W, but, sandwiched.
Sat, Nov 12 vsHawaii ??? Probably
Sat, Nov 19 vsLouisiana Tech ??? Probably
Sat, Nov 26 @Utah State ??? Probably
Sat, Dec 3 vsIdaho ??? Probably
 

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
377
Tokens
Basically, they have to win every iffy game or it pushes/goes Under...
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Thanks for explaining some of the angles GoSooners.
I think at worst this bet pushes...I havent bet it yet, but, will likely pull the trigger this weekend depending on the line I can get.

This is the way I see it:

Sat, Sept 10 @Oregon L
Sat, Sept 17 @San Jose State W
Sat, Sept 24 @Texas Tech L
Sat, Oct 1 @Boise State L
Sat, Oct 8 vsUNLV W
Sat, Oct 15 vsNew Mexico W
Sat, Oct 22 vsFresno State ???
Sat, Oct 29 @New Mexico State W, but, sandwiched.
Sat, Nov 12 vsHawaii ??? Probably
Sat, Nov 19 vsLouisiana Tech ??? Probably
Sat, Nov 26 @Utah State ??? Probably
Sat, Dec 3 vsIdaho ??? Probably

There is no guarantee that they will win that Idaho game. I like the UNDER call on them. I just wish I liked playing these proposition bets better than I do. I don't like having money tied up for 3 months.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,121,689
Messages
13,599,257
Members
101,218
Latest member
mayaania49
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com