So the White House held up aid 90 minutes after the "perfect" phone call

[rolltide]

100% FAKE NEWS. The request to hold it was made a full week before the call. The hold was lifted shortly after the call and the last of the aid package was delivered 19 days BEFORE it was due.

it's crazy how these nutter triggered leftists keep allowing CNN, yahoo, huffpo and NYT to lie to them then run to therxforum to regurgitate the false info, making us all laugh in their fucking faces 4 hours later when the story is proven false.

smalldad, finchy, dongboy, and Hinckley...again, same advice I keep giving you...when you read something from these fact-less MSM bitches give it 36 hours before you come running around here making yourself look like an even bigger dipshit than you are. 99.5% wrong yet you still fall into the same traps? stupid cvnts

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Of course you guys are looking the other way.

Banana Republicans are known to be factose-intolerant

It's not that we're looking the other way, we're simply not looking at all.

The entire storyline is meaningless much like Trump's impeachment.

 

[Willie99]

We're looking the other way now, that's funny, I'm going to blame it on TDS fatigue

They've been talking about impeaching him since before he was inaugurated, NO JOKE, then they pretend it's a solemn moment as Nancy has to hush-up the school children who started applauding

They going to impeach him for

Enriching himself
Using his own hotels
Russian collusion
Obstruction of justice
Quid Pro Quo
Obstruction of congress
Sexism
Racism

They're going to impeach him every moment of every day, he's NOT THEIR POTUS, and them we're supposed to take them serious?

They spy on him
They raid his lawyers office
They arrest everyone they can that's near him just hoping to flip somebody on something, just a fishing expedition
They have whistle blower after whistle blower revealing fake crimes
They run one false story after another without one retraction
They have an investigation into him over a crime that was never committed for nearly three years
When that fishing expedition was stuffed up their ignorant asses so far they get to lick their own assholes like the dogs that they are, they investigate a Ukrainian phone call and call that a crime
They refuse to wait for the courts to rule on the testimony they requested, and they call Trump's resistance Obstruction of Congress
They condone riots
They burn flags
They destroy their neighbors property
They conceal their identities
They miss eight years of economic suck
They despise prosperity

AND THEY SAY WE'RE LOOKING THE OTHER WAY

HOW FUCKING STUPID CAN THEY GET? IS THERE A LEVEL OF IGNORANCE LOWER THAN WHAT THEY'RE EXHIBITING ON THIS FORUM?

We're just genetically superior life forms, that's the only plausible explanation for all this nonsense

they're all just as dumb as they come

 

[Dave007inVegas]

This man said it best....

 

[sportsm60]

Trump only wants a fair trail. He is willing to give the Dems the four people that they want to question but he wants to call people too. Joe and Hunter Biden, Adam Schitt, Nancy and others. I say go for the long trial. Let the truth set them free.

 

[GasMan]

Trump only wants a fair trail. He is willing to give the Dems the four people that they want to question but he wants to call people too. Joe and Hunter Biden, Adam Schitt, Nancy and others. I say go for the long trial. Let the truth set them free.

Thus the problem....part of this equation to defend himself includes these names, and the Dems know they are toast.

 

[SmallDaddy]

Aint no way Trump will let Mulvaney or Bolton to testify.

Republicans can call whoever they want. Dems cant stop that

 

[NFLTrends]

Aint no way Trump will let Mulvaney or Bolton to testify.

Republicans can call whoever they want. Dems cant stop that

Seems like they are going to do it like how the Democrats held their "Inquiry".

I see no issues with it, following the rules the democrats used.

 

[SmallDaddy]

Seems like they are going to do it like how the Democrats held their "Inquiry".

I see no issues with it, following the rules the democrats used.

True. Moscow Mitch is calling the shots.

My response was to the prior two.

They made it seem like that its the Dems that dont want witnesses, when its the Banana Republicans that do not.

A bit of projection on their part

 

[Coldweather]

Let me say this about this here matter! The Democrats are just partnering with the fake liberal media,

to make our great President look bad to their base and to get their base out to vote for Oprah Winfrey,

or whoever, to beatTrump! The Democrats suck and are destroying America! F them and kick them all

out of America like dis! azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^

 

[Michelangelo]

True. Moscow Mitch is calling the shots.

My response was to the prior two.

They made it seem like that its the Dems that don't want witnesses, when its the Banana Republicans that do not.

A bit of projection on their part

The Democrats are caught in a corner and they don't know how to get out. All else is BS posturing to make it look like they occupy high ground when the American people aren't falling for their bs.

The last thing the Dems want is for Joe Biden (their leading candidate and the only one with even a smidgen of a chance to beat Trump) and his son to be called in front of the Senate and be confronted with their Burisma self enrichment scheme for all the world to see in plain daylight.

They are in a corner and there is no exit strategy that could have even a far outside chance of working. In short, they're fked and they know it.

 

[SmallDaddy]

Dems would have 0 problem with the Bidens testifying, especially if they could secure a deal to get Bolton to testify as well

 

[Coldweather]

Dems would have 0 problem with the Bidens testifying, especially if they could secure a deal to get Bolton to testify as well

Dem's and the fake news media are just protecting that bastard Biden and they just want to play this

impeachment game to toss shade on our great president! Fuc- Them!

 

[Willie99]

It's funny that a circus seal actually thinks he knows what Bolten will say

I wonder who his source might be? Adam Shitt? CNN? Maybe street squatters news source? Another loser who's been WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING, but doesn't have any pride so he loves being an asshole with a bleeding asshole

Only losers in life miss eight years of suck, they don't know any better

It's genetics

 

[Willie99]

Dems would have 0 problem with the Bidens testifying, especially if they could secure a deal to get Bolton to testify as well

And he knows this too, despite the fact we all know Biden's son admits he received millions for a job he wasn't qualified for

Astonishingly stupid

 

[SmallDaddy]

Nothing illegal about it. Certainly broke no US laws

Unless you have any evidence, which you do not, that he asked Papa Joe for favors for that company

 

[Willie99]

Illegal donations by a foreign entity

Foreign entity buying favors

It's very much illegal in the political arena

As a matter of fact, Democrats were talking about impeaching Trump for owning international businesses because they said he was going to enrich himself through his office. He wasn't even in office yet

 

[bilbal]

Nothing illegal about it. Certainly broke no US laws

Unless you have any evidence, which you do not, that he asked Papa Joe for favors for that company

So when Trump Jr, his college roommate, and Mike Pompeo's son in law are all magically appointed to the board of a very corrupt energy company in a very corrupt country and Trump Sr tells that country's president that, if they want $1,000,000,000 in US Aid, they have to fire the prosecutor investigating the highly corrupt company that his son is a board member of and Trump Jr and his pals rake in tens of millions of dollars from that one single corrupt firm, you're going to say there was nothing illegal about it and that the Trump's broke no US laws, right? RIGHT? :missingte

 

[bilbal]

Nothing illegal about it. Certainly broke no US laws

Unless you have any evidence, which you do not, that he asked Papa Joe for favors for that company

So Joe Biden bragging, on video, that he threatened to CANCEL, not DELAY, CANCEL, $1,000,000,000 in US Aid unless an investigation into Burisma was ended doesn't count as 'a favor'? Joe didn't give a rat's ass about ANY other investigation into corruption by Ukraine investigators into ANY other Ukraine company (of which there were over a dozen investigations at the time.) Joe's intense, laser-like focus was SOLELY on ONE investigation into ONE specific company, Burisma. Out of over a dozen investigations, his ONE and ONLY concern was the investigation into Burisma. Why? Why was Joe SO concerned about ONLY Burisma??? Why no concern about the other companies who were being investigated for corruption??? Weird, right?

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Nothing illegal about it. Certainly broke no US laws

Unless you have any evidence, which you do not, that he asked Papa Joe for favors for that company

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]I have to agree with you SD. Biden didn't break any laws. If he had surely he would have been
arrested, booked and given the ability to post bail so he could run for the highest office
in the land.

Apparently the video of him bragging about extorting the Ukraine government to fire a prosecutor
isn't evidence of any wrong doing.

I was once blind but now I see. !~))!
[/FONT]