So the bookies cleaned up today on Denver?

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
Wasn't there something here earlier saying that Patriots bets were coming in 4/1 to Denver and the books weren't moving off a 3, so they literally had a side on the game?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
2,009
Tokens
Bookies killed it. There were quite a few "sharps" on NE too when it was -3 and -2.5 in spots. Any time it was 3.5 sharps pounded denver so books just stalled the line. Either way there was an absolute ton of action on the pats, myself included.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,836
Tokens
The late movement says to me that it most likely wasnt 7 to 1 new england by game time but you may see some new carpet and tv's installed
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,669
Tokens
the squares are on arizona
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,791
Tokens
so much late money came down on the broncos you wouldnt believe it. a full point move millions. they did okay on the game. yup

DENVER WINNAH


MEMPHY
 

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
2,710
Tokens
that missed XP with Gostkowski changed the course of the day; I think it is very suspect. He is the best kicker in the game. I don't understand how he missed the XP

It was wide right. Shit happens. You think he missed on purpose to lose game?
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
1,601
Tokens
the squares are on arizona
all the square and sharp stuff is really stupid, no? The longer I do that I realize it's totally fake.

All the squares were on Golden state the other night when they rolled the cavs by 30. All the sharps were on Baylor yesterday when Oklahoma stomped them.

All I heard about was sharps money on new england and arizona. Billy Walters, etc. It's dumb. Theres no such thing as a square or a sharp. When it wins its sharp. When it loses its square. Simple as that.
 

The Miracle Worker
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,748
Tokens
The Under, Denver ML, and Denver Spread
Was probaly really good for all the smaller
and medium sized recreational books offshore.

That was a great result for all of them.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,669
Tokens
square can be a good side, but bruce arians isnt a very good side. trick plays down 10? lol play football:):)
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
2,854
Tokens
all the square and sharp stuff is really stupid, no? The longer I do that I realize it's totally fake.

All the squares were on Golden state the other night when they rolled the cavs by 30. All the sharps were on Baylor yesterday when Oklahoma stomped them.

All I heard about was sharps money on new england and arizona. Billy Walters, etc. It's dumb. Theres no such thing as a square or a sharp. When it wins its sharp. When it loses its square. Simple as that.

a square has sharp corners and there are 4 sharp corners to a square. All the square and sharp talk is stupid. You local college frat guys losing mega bucks to locals prolly think this forum is full of sharps. This forum thurs Vegas and Twitter is ful of sharps.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,669
Tokens
a square has sharp corners and there are 4 sharp corners to a square. All the square and sharp talk is stupid. You local college frat guys losing mega bucks to locals prolly think this forum is full of sharps. This forum thurs Vegas and Twitter is ful of sharps.

Z
 

The Miracle Worker
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,748
Tokens
Over the years I have moved away from calling
any wager sharp and or square. In my personal
opinion in 2016 there is too much grey area now
to label any bet sharp or square.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
7,158
Tokens
He missed the XP because it is now a FG range. Mcmanus missed an XP against the Steelers the first time they played which cost me $ as well.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
204
Tokens
It was wide right. Shit happens. You think he missed on purpose to lose game?
no obviously not, but now hes like 600/601 on XPs for a 99.99999999999999999999% rate. So if you backed the Pats, you took one of the worst beats of all time the 0.000001% happened for Denver to win.

Pats ML was a good pick
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2011
Messages
204
Tokens
He missed the XP because it is now a FG range. Mcmanus missed an XP against the Steelers the first time they played which cost me $ as well.

doesn't change the fact Gostkowski made 60/60 this year from "FG range" XP's. Denver got a 0.000000000000001% thing to happen for them, congrats Denver well played
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,787
Messages
13,572,983
Members
100,862
Latest member
brokenplanethoodiec
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com