Theres plenty of whackos Game.
Always has been. Always will be.
Timothy McVay for one.
Race and religious wars have a far greater entertainment value for those who like to get in a tizzy about that stuff.
You should convert to Judaism and head for Israel.
You could have a ball as an IDF sniper on the Gaza strip.
Always has been. Always will be.
Timothy McVay for one.
Race and religious wars have a far greater entertainment value for those who like to get in a tizzy about that stuff.
You should convert to Judaism and head for Israel.
You could have a ball as an IDF sniper on the Gaza strip.
So you believe the teachings of killing the infidels is simply talk, no way the radicals actually mean it. no way they are involved in 15 conflicts worldwide cutting throats of their neighbors who do not submit. sound like it's up to the infidels to submit and avoid the cars the nutters drive.
bblight said:
You stated that those who wish to violently overthrow a government should be arrested and charged yet you support an administration (and presumably decades of similar foreign policy) that does exactly that.
Or is it only immoral when it happens to Americans rather than by Americans??
(Before you respond, remember that I advocated the overthrow of Saddam from within, rather than via military measures. The Shia uprising never should have been abandoned. But the internal coup backed by the US in Haiti was quite wrong. As were the American attempts to oust Chavez.)
Quote xpanda: ...As were the American attempts to oust Chavez...
Him & Castro together-- left alone to conquer weaker countries & foment guerrilla movements in most of the others?? No thank you!!
And that would've been Chavez' next excuse, like the Argentine dictatorship attempted with the Falkland Islands-- only with one of his weaker neighbors / much more disastrous consequences...
Him & Castro together-- left alone to conquer weaker countries & foment guerrilla movements in most of the others?? No thank you!!
And that would've been Chavez' next excuse, like the Argentine dictatorship attempted with the Falkland Islands-- only with one of his weaker neighbors / much more disastrous consequences...
xpanda - what the hell are you talking about?
What does that have to do with the subject - which was "Should all Islamic military outpost in America been closed"
International intrigue and war are not Islamic outposts in America - I'd be happy to explain the difference in detail, but I think you should be able to figure it out on your own.
xpanda - you're not a "French" Canadian are you? It would explain a lot!
What does that have to do with the subject - which was "Should all Islamic military outpost in America been closed"
International intrigue and war are not Islamic outposts in America - I'd be happy to explain the difference in detail, but I think you should be able to figure it out on your own.
xpanda - you're not a "French" Canadian are you? It would explain a lot!
This is a very serious question that will need to be answered soon. Why should we allow the enemy to operate openly in military outpost inside the gates and we sit by and wait till they hit us.
If they are rallying the troops to kill infidels and we do nothing then we deserve what we get. I have a feeling Americans will see the light soon enough.
How about a campaign? Close Islamic miltary outpost in America! I love it. Is anyone promoting this?
If they are rallying the troops to kill infidels and we do nothing then we deserve what we get. I have a feeling Americans will see the light soon enough.
How about a campaign? Close Islamic miltary outpost in America! I love it. Is anyone promoting this?
Bill: Game thinks Mosques are synonymous with Islamic military outposts. Any Muslim believers are the 'enemy within.' I suspect he'd love to see a rebirth of Japanese internment camps.
Blight/Charles: Chavez sides with the poor in his country, hence his widespread popularity. Further, he was democratically elected, uh, more than once. Yet the US has tried to fund an opposition group to take him out. Charming. This is what I mean by irony. The sky is falling if people on your soil would love to see the ousting of your leadership (if that is even true,) but business as usual when your gov't does it elsewhere. S'all.
Blight/Charles: Chavez sides with the poor in his country, hence his widespread popularity. Further, he was democratically elected, uh, more than once. Yet the US has tried to fund an opposition group to take him out. Charming. This is what I mean by irony. The sky is falling if people on your soil would love to see the ousting of your leadership (if that is even true,) but business as usual when your gov't does it elsewhere. S'all.
No, X: he uses the poor because in most of those countries there's open class warfare / hate. He took over in a coup d'etat, he's threatened American lives & property, he aims to confiscate all foreign holdings & declare all debts void:
Money does not grow on trees-- in one fell swoop he will plunder & severely cripple international companies, banks & economies, export that revolution to his neighbors, then after the bloodbaths we get to send in more money to rebuild the infrastructures. That's the next Castro-Saddam if you leave him alone--
There is nothing sinister going on from our end: we are not the Stalins & Hitlers of the world-- we only attempt to nip the budding ones before they cause major catastrophes.
Money does not grow on trees-- in one fell swoop he will plunder & severely cripple international companies, banks & economies, export that revolution to his neighbors, then after the bloodbaths we get to send in more money to rebuild the infrastructures. That's the next Castro-Saddam if you leave him alone--
There is nothing sinister going on from our end: we are not the Stalins & Hitlers of the world-- we only attempt to nip the budding ones before they cause major catastrophes.
