Serena Williams retiring

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
9,851
Tokens
Golf or Tennis more boring?

my MIL said watching tennis with Serena gone her prayers were answered….
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,707
Tokens
good data

(1988 may have been the most dominating yr in woman's tennis. Graff went 72-3, won the Grand Slam and Olympic Gold. )

dont think its that black and white tho. Graf never faced anyone with Serena's power. Record for both in GS final; Serena 23-10, Graf 22-9 ...no seperation

i'll go with this ;

Roland Garros;

Graf -165


Wimbledon

Serena - 165


Flushing Meadows

Serena -140
You cannot compare different era's for obvious reasons. Different technology, training are going to make current athletes bigger, faster, and stronger than athletes of yesteryear. (Mike Gartner notwithstanding) Most of today's top 20 players have a faster serve than Sampras, but Sampras is without a doubt one of the two best servers ever! When Graf reached adulthood turning 18, she stayed relatively healthy for 9 years and was ranked number 1 for over 80% of her career!! No one is even close to that, male or female. In 95 and 96 she was 42-0 in grand slams matches and 8-0 in the "fifth slam" year end championship, a tourney the all time great Nadal has never won. In 97 with knee, wrist, back surgeries, she played in less than 20 matches and her career was basically over. Joker, if he's allowed to play in the slams will eventually break all of Graf's records but only by playing much longer. No one comes close to what Graf accomplished in so few years!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,707
Tokens
Id argue it was the opposite

In '88 graf was 19 and dominated . Her two main competitors were a 32 yrs old (martina) and a 34 yr old (Chris ). Way past their prime
Martina was ranked number 1 late in 87, until Graf came along. Ranked number 2 in 88, 89, and 90! Graf was number 1. Not way past her prime! Still in her prime, if no Graf three more years of number 1 rankings. Chris was ranked number 2 in 87 until Graf came along. Ranked number 3 in 88 and 89.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
No tennis player's prime yrs are in their 30's , cmon now. They all start to fade , injuries, mental toll/drive, age doing its thing. Get some freaks like Martina/Roger but they were outliers. Graf was playing Martina at age 32 + !! record head -to-head is 9-9. It Bodes well for an argument for Martina, not Graf. Graf was in her prime!
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,762
Tokens
Proving the greatest of the all-time greats is an impossible exercise. Suffice to say, there are typically multiple options

Except when it comes to QBs and Tom Brady
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
1,014
Tokens
She won a grand slam tournament while she was pregnant.... legendary shit
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,497
Tokens
No tennis player's prime yrs are in their 30's , cmon now. They all start to fade , injuries, mental toll/drive, age doing its thing. Get some freaks like Martina/Roger but they were outliers. Graf was playing Martina at age 32 + !! record head -to-head is 9-9. It Bodes well for an argument for Martina, not Graf. Graf was in her prime!
Even with the age difference between Graf and Martina , not really that surprising that the two greatest women tennis players of all time went 9-9 head to head. Martina was a dominant force at 32..
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
yes, i agree, Martina was still a dominate force. The numbers prove that . Just like Roger at 35, still could beat 90% of the field lol. BUT, the point is Roger at 35 is not the same as Roger at 25

Graff's two main opponents early in her career were Hall of Famers who's best yrs were behind them

said another way;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at 33 is not the same as ;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at age 23 .

h-2-h
Vs Martina 9-9
Vs Evert 7-6

It's not as cut and dry as phd appears to claim with Graff as being the GOAT. Let's keep in mind that the tennis world usually gives the 'GOAT' to the person with the most Grand Slams. Well that's Serena

also phd's talk about advances in racket tech., players faster etc , well does that really factor here? i think we can cross different eras here--Serena was akin to allowing a transgender on the WTA Tour. Her power unseen, physically pound her opponent. Was often not a fair fight.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,497
Tokens
yes, i agree, Martina was still a dominate force. The numbers prove that . Just like Roger at 35, still could beat 90% of the field lol. BUT, the point is Roger at 35 is not the same as Roger at 25

Graff's two main opponents early in her career were Hall of Famers who's best yrs were behind them

said another way;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at 33 is not the same as ;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at age 23 .

h-2-h
Vs Martina 9-9
Vs Evert 7-6

It's not as cut and dry as phd appears to claim with Graff as being the GOAT. Let's keep in mind that the tennis world usually gives the 'GOAT' to the person with the most Grand Slams. Well that's Serena

also phd's talk about advances in racket tech., players faster etc , well does that really factor here? i think we can cross different eras here--Serena was akin to allowing a transgender on the WTA Tour. Her power unseen, physically pound her opponent. Was often not a fair fight.
I don't think her competition was all that great to be honest. And most of those same opponents were scared going into those matches.
I'd still rank them
Graf
Martina
Williams

Not a big gap though with all 3
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,707
Tokens
No tennis player's prime yrs are in their 30's , cmon now. They all start to fade , injuries, mental toll/drive, age doing its thing. Get some freaks like Martina/Roger but they were outliers. Graf was playing Martina at age 32 + !! record head -to-head is 9-9. It Bodes well for an argument for Martina, not Graf. Graf was in her prime!
You said way past their prime. Minus Graf, Martina and Chris were still ranked 1 and 2 in the world, just like for most of the early 80's! Martina still won 90% of her matches that was with 3 to 4 defeats and the hands of Graf! Martina was 5-1 vs Graf in 85 and 86! Graf was still a 16 year old kid going against the first truly muscular, fit, beast of a female tennis player. 87 onwards Graf owned Martina.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
k, we will agree to disagree. graf was playing with 2 woman in their 30's . Sorry man, yes, Martina was past her prime. No tennis player's prime is in their 30's . The game needed a young gun to handle these geriatrics and it arrived in Graff. Your arguement would have much greater merit if Evert, Martina, graff were similar age group. And i got a hunch that 9-9 , 7-6 record would be kinda worse for Graff if they did

for me, no clear goat in woman's tennis.

if those 3 were to face all in their prime? hypothetically?

the best bet for me would be ;

On clay;
Graff over EITHER Martina/Serena

but at Wimbledon? tell me you can find a better match up then Martina Vs Serena? haha. I think Martina's net game could give Serena fits, esp., if she's off with the groundstrokes whcih was not uncommon for her. If they played 4 matches at Centre Court wouldnt surprise me if its 2-2
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,707
Tokens
yes, i agree, Martina was still a dominate force. The numbers prove that . Just like Roger at 35, still could beat 90% of the field lol. BUT, the point is Roger at 35 is not the same as Roger at 25

Graff's two main opponents early in her career were Hall of Famers who's best yrs were behind them

said another way;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at 33 is not the same as ;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at age 23 .

h-2-h
Vs Martina 9-9
Vs Evert 7-6

It's not as cut and dry as phd appears to claim with Graff as being the GOAT. Let's keep in mind that the tennis world usually gives the 'GOAT' to the person with the most Grand Slams. Well that's Serena

also phd's talk about advances in racket tech., players faster etc , well does that really factor here? i think we can cross different eras here--Serena was akin to allowing a transgender on the WTA Tour. Her power unseen, physically pound her opponent. Was often not a fair figh

yes, i agree, Martina was still a dominate force. The numbers prove that . Just like Roger at 35, still could beat 90% of the field lol. BUT, the point is Roger at 35 is not the same as Roger at 25

Graff's two main opponents early in her career were Hall of Famers who's best yrs were behind them

said another way;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at 33 is not the same as ;

Graff at age 19 Vs Martina at age 23 .

h-2-h
Vs Martina 9-9
Vs Evert 7-6

It's not as cut and dry as phd appears to claim with Graff as being the GOAT. Let's keep in mind that the tennis world usually gives the 'GOAT' to the person with the most Grand Slams. Well that's Serena

also phd's talk about advances in racket tech., players faster etc , well does that really factor here? i think we can cross different eras here--Serena was akin to allowin
How the fuck do you delete a bloody reply!?!?!?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,707
Tokens
k, we will agree to disagree. graf was playing with 2 woman in their 30's . Sorry man, yes, Martina was past her prime. No tennis player's prime is in their 30's . The game needed a young gun to handle these geriatrics and it arrived in Graff. Your arguement would have much greater merit if Evert, Martina, graff were similar age group. And i got a hunch that 9-9 , 7-6 record would be kinda worse for Graff if they did

for me, no clear goat in woman's tennis.

if those 3 were to face all in their prime? hypothetically?

the best bet for me would be ;

On clay;
Graff over EITHER Martina/Serena

but at Wimbledon? tell me you can find a better match up then Martina Vs Serena? haha. I think Martina's net game could give Serena fits, esp., if she's off with the groundstrokes whcih was not uncommon for her. If they played 4 matches at Centre Court wouldnt surprise me if its 2-2
And no tennis players prime are in their teens either! Martina was still in her prime as evident by the fact she still won over 90% of her matches in 87 and 88 and that's with all those loses to Graf! Women's game not as taxing as the men's game. Best of three not of five. Plus Martina was the first female tennis player to take training to another level. She had a huge edge on all her peers. At 32 she was still in better shape than the rest of the tour. Evert started 6-0 vs Graf (85-86) then as Graf matured, she went 7-0 vs Evert. Also Serena won way more slams in her early 30's than at any other point in her career! Thus her prime years are 31-34 in which she won 8 slams! At no other 4 year stretch of her career did she ever win more than 6 slams.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
Serena? built like a truck bro. Severe outlier territory . She can handle some of these kids at 40 lol . An entirely different animal. An age arguement landing with outliers? R u denying that past 30 in woman's golf is not well past prime? huh?

what's your line for ;

Serena Vs Martina Wimbledon Centre Court.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,707
Tokens
Serena? built like a truck bro. Severe outlier territory . She can handle some of these kids at 40 lol . An entirely different animal. An age arguement landing with outliers? R u denying that past 30 in woman's golf is not well past prime? huh?

what's your line for ;

Serena Vs Martina Wimbledon Centre Court.
And Martina was the very first truck built! For most yes not for the two beasts of the Sport, Martina and Serena

Depends on the grass, and if the serve and volley game would hold up with today racquets! On fast grass, the serve and volley may still work. Fuck I have no idea.

Old "fast" grass

Martina -150
Serena +120

Today's grass

Serena -125
Martina ev
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,707
Tokens
Proving the greatest of the all-time greats is an impossible exercise. Suffice to say, there are typically multiple options

Except when it comes to QBs and Tom Brady
Logically, commonsensical, Golf, Tennis, combat sports, and many Olympic sports are the only sports where wins matter! Never understood why everyone equals individual greatness with team success? Bonds, Ken Griffey jr. gotta suck then.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
Serena bid adieu at The Canadian Open (National Bank). Toronto sent her home with a standing ovation, she got all choked up. Cool scene. gl to her going forward.

Should be a great send off, emotional scene at Flushing Meadows, NY

................

She reminisced about past matches in the city and thanked the fans for all of their support as she wiped away tears.

"Like I said in my article, I'm terrible at goodbyes but goodbye Toronto," she said while noticeably choked up.

"It was a lot of emotions, obviously I love playing here, I always loved playing here," she said while adding that "it's been a pretty interesting 24 hours."
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,762
Tokens
Logically, commonsensical, Golf, Tennis, combat sports, and many Olympic sports are the only sports where wins matter! Never understood why everyone equals individual greatness with team success? Bonds, Ken Griffey jr. gotta suck then.
I'm just going to suggest that you're not very good at making my arguments for me, and even worse at putting words in my mouth

I like being me, you do you :)
 

Just An Example Of What A Working Man Can Achieve
Handicapper
Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Messages
156
Tokens

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,595
Messages
13,452,850
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com