Rove back on the hot seat ... how does one eat Turd Bloosom? Well done, perhaps???

Search
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
Rove back on the hot seat.

"http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cia_leak_investigation

Source: Rove to Testify in CIA Leak Case

By JOHN SOLOMON 13 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Top White House aide Karl Rove prepared to testify Wednesday for a fifth time before the federal grand jury investigating the leak of a CIA officer's identity, a person familiar with the case said.

Rove consulted with his private lawyers before a scheduled afternoon court appearance and was prepared to answer questions about evidence that emerged since his last grand jury appearance last fall, the person said, speaking only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy rules.

That new evidence includes information that emerged late last year that Rove's attorney had conversations with Time magazine reporter Viveca Novak during a critical time in the case.

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald met with the grand jury Wednesday. Among other things he is investigating why Rove originally failed to disclose to prosecutors that he had talked to Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper about the outed CIA operative, Valerie Plame, back in 2003.

"And the hope from the Rove camp, all can be resolved and Karl Rove cleared of wrongdoing in the relatively near future."

Not going to happen.
cooking-pig.gif


Rove is a cooking!

UPDATE #2: Norah O’Donnell reports on MSNBC that Rove will be testifying today before the G/J for a fifth time in the CIA leak case. O’Donnell reports that there are serious questions about how forthcoming/honest Rove has been — and that there are potential questions of more legal jeopardy. <TABLE class=post-message cellSpacing=10 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD width="1%"></TD><TD width="99%">
karl_rove_685.jpg

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=post-bottom cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=smalltext></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Last edited by a moderator:

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
Doc you just incurred a 2 stroke penalty. It's just window dressing man, you know it is.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
CC:

Patriotess bought the MR and MR Patriotess gift set for that SPECIAL
RIGHTIE on this forum (and I think ya can guess on that one)
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
It looks like a poppyhead to me.

Is there a native Indian beer page ?
:drink:


[These suicide bombers don't give up do they.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
<TABLE cellPadding=33 width=900 bgColor=#e8f2ff border=0><TBODY><TR><TD><DL><DT>[SIZE=+2]Carpe Mañana: The clinton Terrorism Policy
[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')[/SIZE]
<DD>
[SIZE=-2]FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME![/SIZE][SIZE=-2][/SIZE]


<DD>by Mia T, 04.18.06


<DT><CENTER><MAP name=mapTOM><AREA shape=RECT coords=0,0,811,381 href="http://www.deletehillary.com/tomorrow.swf"></MAP>
tomorrow.jpg

<TABLE cellPadding=88 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD><CENTER>

<TABLE cellPadding=40 width=630 bgColor=#ffffff border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
<MAP name=mapNERO04><AREA shape=RECT coords=0,0,284,220 href="http://members.aol.com/miat/images/qwerty6.swf"></MAP>
nero22.gif
"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war,'' [clinton] said.

He also reflected on his own decisions when, as commander in chief, he was urged to launch a military strike.<SUP>6</SUP>

"I always thought of Senator Fulbright and the terrible quagmire in Vietnam and how many times we sent more soldiers and found ourselves in a hole and kept digging because we didn't want to look like we were weak,'' he said.

"So anytime somebody said in my presidency, 'If you don't do this people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years:[SIZE=+1][/SIZE]'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'"

"If we can kill 'em tomorrow, then we're not weak,<SUP>1</SUP> and we might be wise enough to try to find an alternative way,'' he said.
[SIZE=-1]bill clinton
[/SIZE]
</TD></TR><TR><TD>
[SIZE=+2]<MAP name=map12110312459876S><AREA shape=RECT coords=0,0,319,239 href="http://members.aol.com/n0clint0ns/onterrorF.swf"></MAP>
on-terrorF.jpg
[/SIZE]
Bill Clinton, the Sultan of Swing, gave an interesting speech last week, apropos foreign policy: "Anytime somebody said in my presidency, 'If you don't do this people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' If we can kill 'em tomorrow, then we're not weak, and we might be wise enough to try to find an alternative way."

The trouble was tomorrow never came - from the first World Trade Center attack to Khobar Towers to the African embassy bombings to the USS Cole. Manana is not a policy. The Iranians are merely the latest to understand that.
<DL><DT>[SIZE=-1]Reason Enough To Act[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]
BY MARK STEYN
[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-2]The New York Sun
April 17, 2006
[/SIZE]
</DT></DL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
</CENTER>


[SIZE=+2]<MAP name=map4180655432><AREA shape=RECT coords=0,0,149,142 href="http://www.deletehillary.com"></MAP>
f.jpg




or the clintons
[/SIZE]
to succeed, Bush must fail, which means America must lose THE WAR.

Make no mistake: The undermining of Bush and <MAP name=map3><AREA shape=RECT alt="" coords=0,0,185,179 href="http://www.deletehillary.com/terrorism.htm"></MAP>
terrorism.gif
America is the number one clinton imperative.<SUP>2</SUP>

[SIZE=+1]DEFINING DEVIANCY DOWN[/SIZE]

The clintons typically prop themselves up by revising others down.<SUP>3</SUP> Direct, upward revision of their own legacy is virtually impossible to pull off,[SIZE=+1]<SUP>4</SUP>[/SIZE] given their wide-reaching unsavory renown.<SUP>5</SUP>

But the clintons' inflated sense of self causes them from time to time to dispense with rational thought and attempt to do just this; and so we get the clinton mañanas.

[SIZE=+1]PURPOSEFUL FAILURE[/SIZE]

First clinton claimed he got impeached on purpose. To save the Constitution, he said. Now he claims he failed to confront terrorism on purpose. Because we can kill 'em tomorrow, he says.
NOTE: The clintons did fail to confront terrorism on purpose, but not for the reason stated. (Indeed, contrary to clinton's absurd argument, the clintons' feckless inaction (and feckless action, for that matter,) were precisely the sign of weakness that emboldened bin Laden and al Qaeda.<SUP>1</SUP> Bin Laden told us so himself.

<SUP>
</SUP>
[SIZE=+1]<TABLE cellPadding=33 bgColor=#ffffff border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
Lopez: [SIZE=+2]In sum, how many times did Bill Clinton lose bin Laden?[/SIZE]

Miniter:[SIZE=-1][/SIZE]Here's a rundown. The Clinton administration:
1. Did not follow-up on the attempted bombing of Aden marines in Yemen.

2. Shut the CIA out of the 1993 WTC bombing investigation, hamstringing their effort to capture bin Laden.

3. Had Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, a key bin Laden lieutenant, slip through their fingers in Qatar.

4. Did not militarily react to the al Qaeda bombing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

5. Did not accept the Sudanese offer to turn bin Laden.

6. Did not follow-up on another offer from Sudan through a private back channel.

7. Objected to Northern Alliance efforts to assassinate bin Laden in Afghanistan.

8. Decided against using special forces to take down bin Laden in Afghanistan.

9. Did not take an opportunity to take into custody two al Qaeda operatives involved in the East African embassy bombings. In another little scoop, I am able to show that Sudan arrested these two terrorists and offered them to the FBI. The Clinton administration declined to pick them up and they were later allowed to return to Pakistan.

10. Ordered an ineffectual, token missile strike against a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory.

11. Clumsily tipped off Pakistani officials sympathetic to bin Laden before a planned missile strike against bin Laden on August 20, 1998. Bin Laden left the camp with only minutes to spare.

12-14. Three times, Clinton hesitated or deferred in ordering missile strikes against bin Laden in 1999 and 2000.

15. When they finally launched and armed the Predator spy drone plane, which captured amazing live video images of bin Laden, the Clinton administration no longer had military assets in place to strike the archterrorist.
16. Did not order a retaliatory strike on bin Laden for the murderous attack on the USS Cole.

<CENTER>
finalframe.jpg

</CENTER></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>[/SIZE]
<CENTER>[SIZE=+1]MORE[/SIZE]</CENTER>



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
</CENTER></DT></DL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

<HR align=left width=780>

[SIZE=+1]1[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]

<TABLE cellPadding=33 width=902 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
[SIZE=+2]BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS[/SIZE][SIZE=+2] [/SIZE](SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


[SIZE=+1][/SIZE][SIZE=+1]INTERVIEW:[/SIZE][SIZE=+1] Osama bin Laden[/SIZE][SIZE=+1] [/SIZE](may 1998)

In the first part of this interview which occurred in May 1998, a little over two months before the U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, Osama bin Laden answers questions posed to him by some of his followers at his mountaintop camp in southern Afghanistan. In the latter part of the interview, ABC reporter John Miller is asking the questions.



[SIZE=+1]Describe the situation when your men took down the American forces in Somalia.[/SIZE]
After our victory in Afghanistan and the defeat of the oppressors who had killed millions of Muslims, the legend about the invincibility of the superpowers vanished. Our boys no longer viewed America as a superpower. So, when they left Afghanistan, they went to Somalia and prepared themselves carefully for a long war. They had thought that the Americans were like the Russians, so they trained and prepared. They were stunned when they discovered how low was the morale of the American soldier. America had entered with 30,000 soldiers in addition to thousands of soldiers from different countries in the world. As I said, our boys were shocked by the low morale of the American soldier and they realized that the American soldier was just a paper tiger. He was unable to endure the strikes that were dealt to his army, so he fled, and America had to stop all its bragging and all that noise it was making in the press after the Gulf War in which it destroyed the infrastructure and the milk and dairy industry that was vital for the infants and the children and the civilians and blew up dams which were necessary for the crops people grew to feed their families. Proud of this destruction, America assumed the titles of world leader and master of the new world order. After a few blows, it forgot all about those titles and rushed out of Somalia in shame and disgrace, dragging the bodies of its soldiers. America stopped calling itself world leader and master of the new world order, and its politicians realized that those titles were too big for them and that they were unworthy of them. I was in Sudan when this happened. I was very happy to learn of that great defeat that America suffered, so was every Muslim....



[SIZE=+1]The American people, by and large, do not know the name bin Laden, but they soon likely will. Do you have a message for the American people?[/SIZE]
I say to them that they have put themselves at the mercy of a disloyal government, and this is most evident in Clinton's administration....


<CENTER> </CENTER>​

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
[/SIZE]

<TABLE width=910 bgColor=#ffffff border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
[SIZE=+2]

[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
[/SIZE]
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



by Mia T, 8.18.05

<DL><DT><CENTER><MAP name=clintonosamadocsWTITLES_Map><AREA shape=RECT alt="" coords=0,0,899,477 href="http://members.aol.com/mspeel7/clintonfailure.swf"><AREA shape=RECT alt="" coords=0,476,900,1062 href="http://members.aol.com/mspeel7/Usama1-2.jpg"></MAP>
clintonosamadocsWTITLES.jpg

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
thanx to jla and Wolverine for the audio

</CENTER></DT></DL>
<TABLE cellPadding=99 width=900 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>[SIZE=+2]<MAP name=map4010488776634><AREA shape=RECT coords=0,0,143,137 href="http://madhillary.blogspot.com"></MAP>
w.jpg



[/SIZE]

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
My revisionist friends, you forget that noone cared about Bin Laden until after GWB let him attack us on 9/11! We were warned of an imminent attack in August and GWB went on vacation. Even if he had wanted to do something then, it was too late , Clinton was no longer President. So, let's remember who was President when Bin Laden and his Saudi Arabian Brethren attacked us.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Pat Patriot said:
You fuckin assholes want this way....you get it!
Which fucking assholes are you referring to, the ones in the White House?:lolBIG: :lolBIG: :lolBIG: :lolBIG:
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
Hey ! Lets all email wil and complain....

on second thoughts lets just get a life have a beer and enjoy the show.

:drink:

This al-Patriots martyrs brigade attack won't last long, I reckon he's got a life.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
1,433
Tokens
doc mercer said:
Tab: Ya catching on, Amigo!!

They run to the Mods to rat on me and then spamming to them is OK as long as they do it ..

Bunch of Pansie ass MFers who probably still have Mommy change their
panties on a regular basis

Doc: You won't ever hear of me ratting you off to a mod because I think you're articles are entertaining. I actually stuck up for you to Wil the other day. I still haven't received that $50 check by the way.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
chiefssth said:
Doc: You won't ever hear of me ratting you off to a mod because I think you're articles are entertaining. I actually stuck up for you to Wil the other day. I still haven't received that $50 check by the way.
It's in the mail by way of Uruguay Mail, First Class!
 

Living...vicariously through myself.
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
8,456
Tokens
ROVE "NOT A TARGET" OF CIA LEAK INVESTIGATION [Byron York]
Karl Rove has finished testifying before prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's CIA leak investigation grand jury. After the appearance, Rove lawyer Robert Luskin issued a statement:
Karl Rove appeared today before the grand jury investigating the disclosure of a CIA agent's identity. He testified voluntarily and unconditionally at the request of special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to explore a matter raised since Mr. Rove's last appearance in October 2005. In connection with this appearance, the special counsel has advised Mr. Rove that he is not a target of the investigation. Mr. Fitzgerald has affirmed that he has made no decisions regarding charges. At the request of the special counsel, Mr. Rove will not discuss the substance of his testimony.​
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
TOO FUNNY ... "Rove lawyer Robert Luskin issued a statement"

"LETS GO LIVE TO BERLIN ... NAZI FIELD MARSHALL GOERRING ISSUED A STATEMENT ..."

ROVE SHOULD BE SHOT ON SITE AS HE IS AN EMBARRASSEMENT TO THE HUMAN RACE
 

Tom Ace, Pet Detective
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
753
Tokens
yeah, its on the autrian-polish border, right? just kidding
I thought you were attempting to make an illusion to the war crimes tribunal
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,126,810
Messages
13,687,815
Members
102,371
Latest member
jenniferarmins1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com