Republican committee chairs officially ask for PERJURY probe of Hillary Clinton

[superbeets]

[h=1]Republican committee chairs officially ask for PERJURY probe of Hillary Clinton over congressional testimony that 'nothing marked classified' was on her server - which FBI director disputed[/h]

• House Oversight Committee Chair Jason Chaffetz and House Judiciary Committee Chair Bob Goodlatte penned a letter to a U.S. District Attorney
• In it they request that the U.S. District Attorney for D.C. investigate whether Hillary Clinton perjured herself while testifying before Congress
• She said in testimony in 2015 that she didn't send or receive classified information on her email server, a statement that the FBI countered

By NIKKI SCHWAB, U.S. POLITICAL REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and DAVID MARTOSKO, U.S. POLITICAL EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 23:58, 11 July 2016 | UPDATED: 00:16, 12 July 2016




Two Republican House chairmen today officially requested that the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia investigate Hillary Clinton for perjury.
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz and and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte penned a letter to U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips.
In it, they asked Phillips 'to determine whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed perjury and made false statements during her testimony under oath before congressional committees.'



.

 

[superbeets]

+9



House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz penned a letter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia asking that he investigate Hillary Clinton for perjury

+9


CAPITOL GRILL: Comey answered questions in a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on Thursday

+9



IT AIN'T OVER: A new criminal probe would complicate Clinton's presidential run as she gears up to accept the Democratic Party's presidential nomination



.

 

[superbeets]

[h=3]CHAIRS JASON CHAFFETZ AND BOB GOODLATTE WRITE A LETTER[/h]Dear Mr. Phillips:
We write to request an investigation to determine whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed perjury and made false statements during her testimony under oath before congressional committees.
While testifying before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey stated the truthfulness of Secretary Clinton’s testimony before Congress was not within the scope of the FBI’s investigation. Nor had the FBI even considered any of Secretary Clinton’s testimony. Director Comey further testified the Department of Justice requires a criminal referral from Congress to initiate an investigation of Secretary Clinton’s congressional testimony. We are writing for that purpose.
The evidence collected by the FBI during its investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email system appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony. In light of those contradictions, the Department should investigate and determine whether to prosecute Secretary Clinton for violating statutes that prohibit perjury and false statements to Congress, or any other relevant statutes.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.



.

 

[superbeets]

Chaffetz first threatened this new criminal investigation into Clinton's classified email server on Thursday after asking FBI Director James Comey whether he had cause to charge the former secretary of state for lying in a statement she made to Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan during a 2015 hearing on the 2012 Benghazi terror attack.
'There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received,' Clinton said at the time.
Comey said in a hearing Thursday that the FBI had not investigated whether that statement was true, despite finding three documents with classification markings among the messages on her private server.
'Not to my knowledge. I don't think there's been a [criminal] referral from Congress,' Comey said.
Asked if he needed one, Comey told Chaffetz: ' sure do.'
'You'll have one,' said Chaffetz. 'You'll have one in the next few hours.'
Under questioning from South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy, Comey agreed that 'there was classified information' on Clinton's homebrew server, and that Clinton's early denials in that regard were false.
'There was classified material emailed,' he said matter-of-factly.
Asked whether it was accurate that none of those materials were 'marked' classified when Clinton sent or received them, Comey said: 'That's not true.'
'There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents,' he said.
Later in the hearing he was asked directly what offense lying under oath would be and what punishment it could lead to.
'Perjury,' he replied. 'Felony. I can't remember precisely... years in prison.'
Comey was making his first appearance before Congress since announcing the agency's recommendation to not prosecute Clinton over her private email setup.

+9


PERJURY? Clinton said during an October 25, 2015 congressional hearing that 'there was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received,' a statement that turned out not to be true



.

 

[superbeets]

+9


GET READY: Comey (left) and Chaffetz (right) will be key figures in any new investigation moving foward

+9



HOT SEAT: FBI Director James Comey faced a grilling from Republican lawmakers on Thursday



.

 

[superbeets]

'Hillary Clinton created this mess,' Chaffetz said, declaring that Clinton 'made a decision. ... to avoid and bypass the safety, the security and the protocol of the State Department.'
'There doesn't seem to be any consequence' for Clinton, he said. 'It wasn't just an innocent mistake. This went on for years.'
Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings acknowledged that 'there is a gap' between the evidence against Clinton that Comey outlined this week and the conclusions he reached.
'Even if it takes until hell freezes over, I beg you to close the gap.'
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Wednesday that she accepted the recommendations and findings of Comey and of her career prosecutors and would not file charges against Clinton.
Lynch is likely to face questions of her own next week at a separate oversight hearing of the House Judiciary Committee.
Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon criticized the basis for Chaffetz's hearing on Thursday morning, saying in a statement that 'House Republicans are launching yet another taxpayer-funded sham of an inquiry to try to hurt Hillary Clinton politically.'
'For weeks Republicans have said they trusted FBI Director Comey to lead an independent review into Secretary Clinton's emails, but now they are second-guessing his judgment because his findings do not align with their conspiracy theories.'
After the hearing had finished Fallon was singing a different tune.
'Despite the partisan motivations of this hearing, we are glad it took place and that Director Comey had the opportunity to expand upon his remarks from earlier this week,' he said. 'Director Comey's testimony clearly knocked down a number of false Republican talking points and reconciled apparent contradictions between his previous remarks and Hillary Clinton's public statements.'
Fallon said Comey's testimony 'shut the door on any remaining conspiracy theories once and for all.'
'While Republicans may try to keep this issue alive, this hearing proved those efforts will only backfire.'

Comey's decision, and the way he delivered it, infuriated Republicans who felt that the FBI director in his unusually detailed and critical televised statement Tuesday had laid out a sufficient basis for prosecution.
'There seems to be a double standard,' the committee chairman, Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz said on NBC's 'Today Show.'
'If the average Joe had gone through that, they'd probably have handcuffs on him and probably be in jail.'
House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, has said 'there are a lot more questions that need to be answered' and, in a letter to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, requested that Clinton be barred from receiving classified briefings for the rest of the campaign – a move that 'certainly constitutes appropriate sanctions.'

+9


THE QUESTION: Jim Jordan is the Ohio Republican congressman who asked Clinton last year whether there was 'marked classified' material on her private server

+9


FEEDING FRENZY: Capitol Hill turned into a circus on Thursday as Comey arrived to testify

+9


NO BRIEFINGS: House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin has asked the Director of National Intelligence to withhold classified national security briefings from Hillary Clinton as her campaign moves forward



.

 

[superbeets]

'There is no legal requirement for you to provide Secretary Clinton with classified information, and it would send the wrong signal to all those charged with safeguarding our nation's secrets if you choose to provide her access to this information despite the FBI's findings,' Ryan wrote.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump complained that the system was 'rigged' and Clinton 'made so many false statements.
In a stinging assessment of her email practices as secretary of state, Comey rebuked Clinton and her aides for being 'extremely careless' in their handling of classified information and contradicted many of the defenses and explanations she's put forward for months.
But he also said there was no evidence anyone willfully or intentionally mishandled classified information and that 'no reasonable prosecutor' would pursue such a case.
Comey, who served as deputy attorney general in the George W. Bush administration, was appointed in 2013 to a 10-year term as FBI director by President Barack Obama.


.

 

[Willie99]

she stands by her statement (paraphrasing)

"I've never sent or received confidential e-mails on a private server"



face)(*^% :neenee:

who does she think she's talking to? rhetorical question

 

[NFLTrends]

She will skate again... they already have a statement ready

"In looking back at our investigations into perjury, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of testimony; or vast quantities of lies or untruthfulness in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to some sort of form of justice. But that is not what we are deciding now. Since she is Hillary Clinton, we have to let her go free."

 

[Coldweather]

She belongs in the big house. She hates white men, imo and I think she sucks!:youmad:

 

[Dave007inVegas]

She will skate again... they already have a statement ready

"In looking back at our investigations into perjury, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of testimony; or vast quantities of lies or untruthfulness in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to some sort of form of justice. But that is not what we are deciding now. Since she is Hillary Clinton, we have to let her go free."

Absolutely, positively. There is no doubt. Reality bites.

 

[vitterd]

Republicans and phony scandals.....how much time and money will they spend to try to find shit?

 

[NFLTrends]

Republicans and phony scandals.....how much time and money will they spend to try to find shit?

What was phony about the email scandal?? Can you point out where she didnt send or recieve classified emails on a private server?

 

[vitterd]

What was phony about the email scandal?? Can you point out where she didnt send or recieve classified emails on a private server?

Its a lot of garbage. I'm not gonna review the case. But put phony Clinton scandal into google and read Newsweek and other pubs....it's all slot of nonsense. Non stop witch hunts.....Benghazi, email, Clinton foundation....these repubs need to let it go. There is a reason 8 Benghazi hearings found nothing, there is s reason the repub FBI director didn't charge her....nothing there.

 

[NFLTrends]

Its a lot of garbage. I'm not gonna review the case. But put phony Clinton scandal into google and read Newsweek and other pubs....it's all slot of nonsense. Non stop witch hunts.....Benghazi, email, Clinton foundation....these repubs need to let it go. There is a reason 8 Benghazi hearings found nothing, there is s reason the repub FBI director didn't charge her....nothing there.

So you are saying she didnt send classified material over a private email server... which is against federal law?

Just a simple yes or no will suffice. It is a yes or no question.

Did she... or didnt she?

 

[vitterd]

So you are saying she didnt send classified material over a private email server... which is against federal law?

Just a simple yes or no will suffice. It is a yes or no question.

Did she... or didnt she?

I think factcheck has it right.....but why didn't the republican FBI director who contributed to McCain and Romney charge her? You part of that " the fix is in" crowd?

www.factcheck.org/2016/07/revisiting-clinton-and-classified-information/

 

[festeringZit]

So you are saying she didnt send classified material over a private email server... which is against federal law?

Just a simple yes or no will suffice. It is a yes or no question.

Did she... or didnt she?

Good luck getting a clear answer on that one.

Of course sane people realize she's 100% guilty and should be in jail.

 

[festeringZit]

I think factcheck has it right.....but why didn't the republican FBI director who contributed to McCain and Romney charge her? You part of that " the fix is in" crowd?

www.factcheck.org/2016/07/revisiting-clinton-and-classified-information/

ROFL. "factcheck.org" BWHAAHHAAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAH Proven libtard bullshit site, posing as a "factcheck" site.

 

[MantisToboggan]

I think factcheck has it right.....but why didn't the republican FBI director who contributed to McCain and Romney charge her? You part of that " the fix is in" crowd?

www.factcheck.org/2016/07/revisiting-clinton-and-classified-information/

Still won't answer the simple yes or no question?

 

[vitterd]

Good luck getting a clear answer on that one.

Of course sane people realize she's 100% guilty and should be in jail.

The repub FBI director isn't sane? Before the announcement , Russ and other repubs here were saying how legit Comey is......then he said no sane prosecutor would go forward .....and now look what repubs say about him.

I will take his decision on things before 8 fucked up right wingers at RX.