**Randizzle's** System Plays

Search

Yes...I'm the Best.
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
1,120
Tokens
Ok, here is the deal.....last week I posted a Thread that read "Developed something I want to track" Overall it was something like 52-53%, but something finally clicked this week, and I feel I have found that last variable I needed in order for this to be successful. The way I see it, if this can hit at 55 to 60% then Fabulous. Personally, I really believe it will. This is not considered Handicapping to me. These are purely statistics and numbers, no other factors are added in. So, when I track these plays, they will not be part of my "Handicapping Record". But they will be under a "System Record" I am confident enough in these to wager them, but I will only be wagering 1 Unit each on all of them. You can Fade, Play, or just observe. I dont care as any opinion on how well this does or does not work wont bother me since it is purely mathematics, and not my own ability to cap games.

I am sharing this only to contribute. As for the system itself, I will be keeping that too myself. Off we go.

<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">1.Missouri</st1:place></st1:State> Tigers (-21.5)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">2.Ball</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Cardinals (-24)<o:p></o:p>
3.Ole <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Mississippi</st1:State></st1:place> Rebels (-5)<o:p></o:p>
4.Kent Golden Flashes (+8)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">5.Boise</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Broncos (-7)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">6.Florida</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Seminoles (-5)<o:p></o:p>
7.<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Kentucky</st1:State></st1:place> Wildcats*+11 (+22)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">8.San Diego</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Aztecs (+7.5)<o:p></o:p>
9.BYU (-23.5)<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>10.Duke Blue Devils (+10)</o:p>
<o:p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">11.Michigan</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Spartans (-5.5)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">12.Connecticut</st1:State></st1:place> Huskies (Pk)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">13.Northern Illinois</st1:place> Huskies (-8)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">14.Southern California</st1:place> Trojans (-15)

I have already wagered 1 Unit on each of these games. Hope this goes as I expect it too.


Good Luck, Dizz :toast:
</o:p>
 

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2005
Messages
824
Tokens
Is the location in your list significant? In other words, is Missouri a stronger play than, say, BYU, or USC???

Thanks for your time and efforts.

:toast:
 

Yes...I'm the Best.
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
1,120
Tokens
After 1st game the system is perfect...haha...sure wish I could say that after tomorrow is over. No chance. Anyway....a good start to hopefully a 58%-60% system.

1.Missouri Tigers (-21.5)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">2.Ball</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Cardinals (-24)<o:p></o:p>

3.Ole <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Mississippi</st1:State></st1:place> Rebels (-5)<o:p></o:p>
4.Kent Golden Flashes (+8)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">5.Boise</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Broncos (-7) (Winner)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">6.Florida</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Seminoles (-5)<o:p></o:p>
7.<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Kentucky</st1:State></st1:place> Wildcats (+22)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">8.San Diego</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Aztecs (+7.5)<o:p></o:p>
9.BYU (-23.5)<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>10.Duke Blue Devils (+10)</o:p>
<o:p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">11.Michigan</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Spartans (-5.5)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">12.Connecticut</st1:State></st1:place> Huskies (Pk)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">13.Northern Illinois</st1:place> Huskies (-8)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">14.Southern California</st1:place> Trojans (-15)</o:p>

<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>:wink:</o:p>
<o:p>


</o:p>
 

Dogfather
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
2,019
Tokens
I just played a 12 team Progressive Parley, using all except Kent and of course Boise which already played. What do you think, can you get all 12 right. Then my 200 would pay 180,000. OK, then how about winning at least 9 of the 12. That pays 3-1, 10 right pays 10-1 and 11 right pays 80-1 which is 16,000. Should be fun to follow no matter what happens. Thanks for posting.
 

Yes...I'm the Best.
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
1,120
Tokens
I just played a 12 team Progressive Parley, using all except Kent and of course Boise which already played. What do you think, can you get all 12 right. Then my 200 would pay 180,000. OK, then how about winning at least 9 of the 12. That pays 3-1, 10 right pays 10-1 and 11 right pays 80-1 which is 16,000. Should be fun to follow no matter what happens. Thanks for posting.

I hope I do for your sake.....I'm hoping to hut 9 of the 14 to be considered successful. Tell ya what....if all 12 are right and you win 180,000....Hook a brother up with a G....lol

Good Luck.:toast:
 

Dogfather
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
2,019
Tokens
One G?? You want me to give you one G if all 12 hit. No way. If that happens you get 5 G's. Let's have some fun with these.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
689
Tokens
I just played a 12 team Progressive Parley, using all except Kent and of course Boise which already played. What do you think, can you get all 12 right. Then my 200 would pay 180,000. OK, then how about winning at least 9 of the 12. That pays 3-1, 10 right pays 10-1 and 11 right pays 80-1 which is 16,000. Should be fun to follow no matter what happens. Thanks for posting.

A 12 team parlay :missingte

If you think each game is at best a little better then a coinflip--since your using spreads--and college football can be so unpredictable. You have a 1 in 4096 chance of hitting 12 (which is why it pays 900-1)

I really can't believe you threw $200 at it...and you have to hit 9 of them just to get 3-1?!?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,267
Tokens
i thought $200 was alot for a 12 teamer. i usually throw $10 on a 10 teamer. Good luck with the 12 teamer:103631605
 

Yes...I'm the Best.
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
1,120
Tokens
System Plays Update

1.Missouri Tigers (-21.5) (pending)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">2.Ball</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Cardinals (-24) (loss)<o:p></o:p>

3.Ole <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Mississippi</st1:State></st1:place> Rebels (-5) (pending)<o:p></o:p>
4.Kent Golden Flashes (+8) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">5.Boise</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Broncos (-7) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">6.Florida</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Seminoles (-5) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
7.<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Kentucky</st1:State></st1:place> Wildcats*+11 (+22) (loss)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">8.San Diego</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Aztecs (+7.5) (pending)<o:p></o:p>
9.BYU (-23.5) (loss)<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>10.Duke Blue Devils (+10) (WINNER)</o:p>
<o:p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">11.Michigan</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Spartans (-5.5) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">12.Connecticut</st1:State></st1:place> Huskies (Pk) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">13.Northern Illinois</st1:place> Huskies (-8) (loss)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">14.Southern California</st1:place> Trojans (-15) (pending)</o:p>

<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>System is Decent right now...need a strong finish</o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>So Far: (6-4-0 +1.6 Units) 4 games pending. :103631605</o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>


</o:p>
 

Yes...I'm the Best.
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
1,120
Tokens
1.Missouri Tigers (-21.5) (WINNER)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">2.Ball</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Cardinals (-24) (loss)<o:p></o:p>

3.Ole <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Mississippi</st1:State></st1:place> Rebels (-5) (loss)<o:p></o:p>

4.Kent Golden Flashes (+8) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">5.Boise</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Broncos (-7) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">6.Florida</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Seminoles (-5) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
7.<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Kentucky</st1:State></st1:place> Wildcats*+11 (+22) (loss)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">8.San Diego</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Aztecs (+7.5) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
9.BYU (-23.5) (loss)<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>10.Duke Blue Devils (+10) (WINNER)</o:p>
<o:p><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placeName w:st="on">11.Michigan</st1:placeName> <st1:placeType w:st="on">State</st1:placeType></st1:place> Spartans (-5.5) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">12.Connecticut</st1:State></st1:place> Huskies (Pk) (WINNER)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">13.Northern Illinois</st1:place> Huskies (-8) (loss)<o:p></o:p>
<st1:place w:st="on">14.Southern California</st1:place> Trojans (-15) (loss)</o:p>

<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>8-6-0 (+1.4 Units) </o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>Well right at 58%...will continue to track this and see if it can be consistent or not. Only time will tell.</o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>Dizz</o:p>
 

New member
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
6,266
Tokens
Some team should be on automatic fades:

<st1:place w:st="on">13.Northern Illinois</st1:place> Huskies (-8) (loss)

You also had these guys as a big play as an 11.5 pt home FAV against Miami-Ohio on their homecoming and these guys didn't show up.:ohno:

 

Yes...I'm the Best.
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
1,120
Tokens
Some team should be on automatic fades:

<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 /><st1:place w:st="on">13.Northern Illinois</st1:place> Huskies (-8) (loss)

You also had these guys as a big play as an 11.5 pt home FAV against Miami-Ohio on their homecoming and these guys didn't show up.:ohno:

I agree...they havent shown up for me at all. But these are purely system plays so I am playing them anyway to get an accurate read of this system. No capping involved in these. Am thinking of filtering out 110th-120th placed teams according to my power rankings.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,858
Messages
13,574,204
Members
100,877
Latest member
lisasdanceandexercise
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com