What a difference it makes when someone does something and has a certain way about him. He seemed like a class act and like he generally wanted to do good for America. Bush may or may not have the same things in mind but just the way he goes about doing things makes you not like him and not like the things he does. At least if your going to f~ck a group of people over do it with respect and in a way that will piss of the least amount of people. Our kids will have to live in this world after we are gone. That's why I hate Rumsfeld and his arrogant ways.
so did clinton
The gap between the richest and poorest was greater under Clinton than it was under Reagan. Neither one should get the blame; one-parent families is the main cause. As long as one parent families keeps increasing, so will the gap between the richest and the poorest. It is more of a social problem than an economic problem.
Brock, if you are going to point the finger at Reagan for October 1987 crash you need to give him credit for boom that took place between the time he took office to the time he left; in Jan 1981 the Dow was about 900. In 1987 (after black Monday) it was about 1900. Reagan's last month in 1989 the market was about 2200.
Brock, if you are going to point the finger at Reagan for October 1987 crash you need to give him credit for boom that took place between the time he took office to the time he left; in Jan 1981 the Dow was about 900. In 1987 (after black Monday) it was about 1900. Reagan's last month in 1989 the market was about 2200.
