actually i figured about 5-8, but with all the beef i got about gonzaga last week i figured saying what i really thought would be to much negativity.
i really think the if those two teams do play, the score is the 70's to 80's.
if state shoots well they could keep it close, but i think the lines makers will think like the rest of the country and make it a 5 point spread.
And i still think gonzaga wins by double digits.
i really think the if those two teams do play, the score is the 70's to 80's.
if state shoots well they could keep it close, but i think the lines makers will think like the rest of the country and make it a 5 point spread.
And i still think gonzaga wins by double digits.
i know that the % is that high, but why don't they score 75 points a game. it just doesn't add up in my book.
i've watched games and i really wonder how they got that %.
i just don't see state as that good of a team. maybe i'm missing something, somebody please tell what that is. truely being serious here.
i've watched games and i really wonder how they got that %.
i just don't see state as that good of a team. maybe i'm missing something, somebody please tell what that is. truely being serious here.
i watched ill just destroy them, i watched mich own them for 35 to 38 minutes,though they did win, but i just don't get it.
with gonzaga's up and down style, a ton of shots, not to much slow down, and with the zags boarding ability i don't see a lot of second chance points.
plus guard play wins, and gonzaga has some outstanding guard play.
with gonzaga's up and down style, a ton of shots, not to much slow down, and with the zags boarding ability i don't see a lot of second chance points.
plus guard play wins, and gonzaga has some outstanding guard play.
i went back and looked at states games vs tourney teams, out of 10 games, state only out shot their opp % wise twice. they lost both, kansas, and wisky.
and only once did they shoot over 50% and that was the last game against wisky, which they still lost.
shot 35% vs ucla
shot 41% vs ill
shot 36% ve okla
shot 39% vs wisky
shot 43% vs kentucky
this team isn't that good of an offense team.
very overrated.
plus twice teams shot over 60% against them.
cuse and kentucky.
just be careful and best of luck matt. i think the over would be a lock if posted any where near 135 to 142. probably higher.
state still has to get by nevada. not going to be an easy game.
serious.
a double play for me already.
nevada +2-
and i probably don't even need points.
[This message was edited by truelyhandicapping on March 14, 2004 at 10:32 PM.]
and only once did they shoot over 50% and that was the last game against wisky, which they still lost.
shot 35% vs ucla
shot 41% vs ill
shot 36% ve okla
shot 39% vs wisky
shot 43% vs kentucky
this team isn't that good of an offense team.
very overrated.
plus twice teams shot over 60% against them.
cuse and kentucky.
just be careful and best of luck matt. i think the over would be a lock if posted any where near 135 to 142. probably higher.
state still has to get by nevada. not going to be an easy game.
serious.
a double play for me already.
nevada +2-
and i probably don't even need points.
[This message was edited by truelyhandicapping on March 14, 2004 at 10:32 PM.]
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by trytrytry:
the Zags could not be in a better spot. Free ticket to the round of 8 and then who knows all the games are difficult.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
haha
Could not be in a better spot?
They will face Mich State, then GT or BC, then either Kansas or Kentucky.
No cupcake IMO
the Zags could not be in a better spot. Free ticket to the round of 8 and then who knows all the games are difficult.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
haha
Could not be in a better spot?
They will face Mich State, then GT or BC, then either Kansas or Kentucky.
No cupcake IMO
Yes - I make that assumption.
Could be wrong but I consider BCs competition like Providence, Pitt, Uconn, Cuse, Notre Dame, and even seton Hall in a much tougher category than Utah's which includes Wyoming, NM, BYU, SDSU, UNLV, etc.
Dont get me wrong - I dont take anything away from them for playing tough in their two losses vs air force, staying within 9 at Texas Tech, and splitting with just about everyone in their conference - which can be very competitive. But BC playing well in the Big east is an entirely different level.
Just one mans opinion
Could be wrong but I consider BCs competition like Providence, Pitt, Uconn, Cuse, Notre Dame, and even seton Hall in a much tougher category than Utah's which includes Wyoming, NM, BYU, SDSU, UNLV, etc.
Dont get me wrong - I dont take anything away from them for playing tough in their two losses vs air force, staying within 9 at Texas Tech, and splitting with just about everyone in their conference - which can be very competitive. But BC playing well in the Big east is an entirely different level.
Just one mans opinion
