Overtime insurance?

CharlieMaxwell · Jun 15, 2004

If extra sessions were expunged for betting purposes, oddsmakers would need to tweak their over/under formulas. NFL and NBA parlays would be skewed more heavily toward the underdog and the under, perhaps to the point where the conventional 13/5 odds would get nicked down.

Read Arne Lang's entire story by going to the RX home page at www.therx.com

Charlie

JJF · Jun 15, 2004

I think it would be too confusing to not include overtime as part of wagers. The only area I could possibly see it being useful to not include it would be for second half wagers and even then I am not sure it work out well that way.

TheGeneral+ · Jun 15, 2004

I am of the opinion that we win just as many as we lose by having OT included.

BoratSagdiyev · Jun 15, 2004

When you post a link to a story why not just link to the story rather than the Rx homepage? Do you you realize how many extra clicks this will save me? One. But times that by all the days I have left on this earth and it is a lot.Still The Rx

CharlieMaxwell · Jun 15, 2004

Borat,

As we have stated on MANY other occasions, our advertisers pay good money to have their banner ads on our home page. If we just link to the story or cut and paste it here on the posting forum, our page views on the home page are drastically reduced and the value we place on our ads goes down.

If that happens, we cannot support a posting forum and the entire business goes down the toilet.

Kapeesh?

Charlie

BoratSagdiyev · Jun 16, 2004

Charlie Maxwell,Mr Maxwell I think you may have misunderstood what I was trying to say.When you paste a link in why isn't it pointing to the article itself rather than the Rx Home page? I think I may have found the answer.I clicked on the link I posted which was to the article on overtime insurance and it is no longer there. So maybe the Rx home page remains constant but the url for the articles change. Is that it?