Overnight Pacers @ vs. Nets

Search
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
651
Tokens
Pacers +7 (-105) over the Nets
a .0130 rated selection x total bankroll wager
lines and wagers courtsey of
www.cascadesportsbook.com

my line: Nets -2 (-107)

It all just seems to be coming together for the Pacers @ the
right time, believing that they know it, and their opponet knows
it, too. Believe the odds makers to be way off base with their
# on this game. See this game going down to the wire with either
team winning. If either team were more likely of pulling away
from the other, would actually favor a Pacers team that seems
to have so much more depth (even without Tinsley and Jones),
size, and strength (from top to bottom, especially in the front-
court) with O'Neal, Croshere, Foster, Pollard, and Harrison.
Look for Krstic to wear down as the series progress', which I truly
believe will end in a Pacers first round advance. Really like the
my two X-factor Pacer bench players in Granger, and Jasikevicius
who not only allow the team to not skip a beat when coming in,
but often times elevate the teams production with tons of energy,
athletic ability, and talent (not to mention, court smarts).

PROSIDESPORTS
good wagering, everyone!
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Agree. 7 points seems like too much for this Pacer team. I think they cover easy.
GL
 

Banned
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Messages
3,355
Tokens
I like the play and I like how me and you seemed like the only two who knew that the Wizards were no match for the Cavs. I'm riding with you on this one. GL to us all.
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
651
Tokens
Smoothy, reply

sorry to chime in late, but I just don't believe the Nets
match-up very well with a healthy Pacers team. If they
would have played this series a month ago, I would have
favored the Nets, probably in a sweep.
just getting in from the range and course, I'm going to start
working up a selection on the Lakers/Suns game.

Hey Heat,
yah it seems to me that were on the same page alot for better
of worse.
good wagering guys,
back soon!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
278
Tokens
Smoothy - That Is Great Bet Getting A Home Team - 3 For The Game , Carter Heats Up The Nets Win By 6 :)
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
651
Tokens
Vegas Don, reply

what the hell are you talking about?
Smoothy was asking about the 1st half Nets -3.5,
which they didn't happen to cover either.........
so what are you talking about -3 for the game,
didn't see any spreads Nets -3 for the game, where are
you wagering at?
just curious to know, what are you thinking about?
 

Banned
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Messages
3,355
Tokens
PROSIDESPORTS said:
what the hell are you talking about?
Smoothy was asking about the 1st half Nets -3.5,
which they didn't happen to cover either.........
so what are you talking about -3 for the game,
didn't see any spreads Nets -3 for the game, where are
you wagering at?
just curious to know, what are you thinking about?

I think he was confused. He must have thought that the 3.5 was for the game. I'm not sure how he made that mistake because you had your play for the Pacers +7. He must be new to sports betting and not really sure what is going on.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,748
Messages
13,572,210
Members
100,855
Latest member
hazeljames
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com