Agreed.
The best line of the interview was delivered by Moore when O'Reily ended the interview by saying America can now know the way I see the world and the way you(Moore) see the world. Moore's response, "so I am against sacrificing our children to take Fallujah and you are". Priceless!!
Moore was interviewd by Larry King tonight, and made an excellent point. He mentioned that in his opinion polls mean little these days. America has been galvanized by 9/11 and according to Moore many people who have never voted in the past will vote this year. Because the polls use known voters for their information they are missing a potentially large demographic (first time voters) that make any poll inaccurate to put it midly.
wil.
wil.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Chuck Sims:
Moore's response, "so I am against sacrificing our children to take Fallujah and you are". <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I don't think Moore or the circle-jerk liberals would be in favor of making ANY sacrifices for ANY cause, except maybe sacrificing our government and turning control of the U.S.A. over to the U.N.
Moore's response, "so I am against sacrificing our children to take Fallujah and you are". <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I don't think Moore or the circle-jerk liberals would be in favor of making ANY sacrifices for ANY cause, except maybe sacrificing our government and turning control of the U.S.A. over to the U.N.
Moore kept asking O'reiley if he would sacrifice his children in Falujah and O'reiley kept answering "I'd sacrifice myself".
Asking someone if they'd sacrifice their children is a trap question.
No right thinking parent would sacrifice his/her children for anything. ANYTHING!
As the parent of adult children, one of whom volunteered for the Army and served 4 years with the 82nd AirBorn, and who served in Kosovo, I know that each of my children would give the same type of answer - "I'd sacrifice myself".
Moore apparently doesn't have kids of his own, or he just doesn't care to have an honest debate on the issue.
O'Reily also didn't answer the trap question as well as he could have.
Asking someone if they'd sacrifice their children is a trap question.
No right thinking parent would sacrifice his/her children for anything. ANYTHING!
As the parent of adult children, one of whom volunteered for the Army and served 4 years with the 82nd AirBorn, and who served in Kosovo, I know that each of my children would give the same type of answer - "I'd sacrifice myself".
Moore apparently doesn't have kids of his own, or he just doesn't care to have an honest debate on the issue.
O'Reily also didn't answer the trap question as well as he could have.
blight
Thank you for your service.
Its a loaded question.
First off it a voluntary service,and there is a risk involved.Your not commiting suicide.
Moore should be directing the question.."would you sacrifice your son? To the fanantical ragheads...because you would get a yes answer,which kind of explains it all.
Thank you for your service.
Its a loaded question.
First off it a voluntary service,and there is a risk involved.Your not commiting suicide.
Moore should be directing the question.."would you sacrifice your son? To the fanantical ragheads...because you would get a yes answer,which kind of explains it all.
This Moore character must have stayed up all night staring at the ceiling before he came up with his little trap question. Someone should ask Moore why he exploits people's suffering (such as the Columbine victims and mother's of sons killed in military actions) in his films for HIS personal profit. When he tries to wiggle his fat ass out of that trap, he'll step into another as the next question is "Don't you think it's fair to give some of the profit from your films to the victims whose suffering you exploit, because without them, you have no story?" Somebody should do a Moore-style documentary on Moore himself. Now THAT would be entertainment, and I wouldn't miss that one.
I didn't see the interview but the transcript I read on FoxNews pretty much revealed them both to be bumbling idiots. Michael Moore saying that he would have prevented Hitler from taking power.
Biggest laugh I've had in years. What was he going to do? Tell Hindenburg to find someone else? Prevent the Reichstag from burning? Hitler had just enough support to get the Enabling Act through without the Communists and other groups and Michael Moore would have intervened in a sovereign nation's internal affairs when he just said that that shouldn't be done.
They both had an agenda and kept repeating the same idea over and over. Boring!
They both had an agenda and kept repeating the same idea over and over. Boring!
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> "Don't you think it's fair to give some of the profit from your films to the victims whose suffering you exploit, because without them, you have no story?" <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
If you didn't have such a whacko society in the first place people like Moore wouldn't get a look-in.
Guns. Charging off to war. Jingoism masquerading as patriotism with right-wingers howling 'moral superiority!'.
Mix in Americas religious slapheads and you've got a political landscape that makes nitroglycerin look stable.
Its fascinating for an outsider to watch this craziness unfold.
(Americans seemed so normal when I was there.)
I wonder if there's enough normal people left to prevent a Bush win in November.
If you didn't have such a whacko society in the first place people like Moore wouldn't get a look-in.
Guns. Charging off to war. Jingoism masquerading as patriotism with right-wingers howling 'moral superiority!'.
Mix in Americas religious slapheads and you've got a political landscape that makes nitroglycerin look stable.
Its fascinating for an outsider to watch this craziness unfold.
(Americans seemed so normal when I was there.)
I wonder if there's enough normal people left to prevent a Bush win in November.
I just read the transcript. Moore didnt wipe the floor with anyone.
His "we are sending children to war" nonsense is ludicrous(sp?) It is a volunteer army and they are young men and women but they are not children. The arabs and the terrorists send actual children to fight, we send our armed forces.
His other nonsense about "Bush lied" when he based his decision on intelligence is dumb because if he didn't act and then we get attacked it is Bushs fault for not acting on the intelligence.
Moore and his type also seem to forget that we went into Afghanistan first , we didnt head to Iraq on september 12th 2001.
His "we are sending children to war" nonsense is ludicrous(sp?) It is a volunteer army and they are young men and women but they are not children. The arabs and the terrorists send actual children to fight, we send our armed forces.
His other nonsense about "Bush lied" when he based his decision on intelligence is dumb because if he didn't act and then we get attacked it is Bushs fault for not acting on the intelligence.
Moore and his type also seem to forget that we went into Afghanistan first , we didnt head to Iraq on september 12th 2001.
I'm on Moore's side but the whole interview was lame and tedious. O'Reily is stuck on this new 911 commission report bullshit trying to vindicate Bush's lies(give me a fucking break already) and Moore didn't look like he wanted to be there, and his only good argument was the sacrificing babies thing which was o.k. but I expected a better debate from these two clowns.
He handed Ted Koppel his as well. You can't touch the truth baby. Many of you are braught up diappered in the American flag and are unable to see the forrest through the trees.
Moore is spot on. If not please begin posting his lies now....... I have no problem posting Bush's. He give you endless ammunition.
Mr. NJ Sports Wrote "Moore and his type also seem to forget that we went into Afghanistan first , we didnt head to Iraq on september 12th 2001" Yeah and look at what a great job did there. Doctors without borders are now pulling out of there because the U.S. fucked it up sp bad.
Moore is spot on. If not please begin posting his lies now....... I have no problem posting Bush's. He give you endless ammunition.
Mr. NJ Sports Wrote "Moore and his type also seem to forget that we went into Afghanistan first , we didnt head to Iraq on september 12th 2001" Yeah and look at what a great job did there. Doctors without borders are now pulling out of there because the U.S. fucked it up sp bad.
www.moorelies.com
Here they are Ben. And while you are surfin' the web how about downloading a spell check
Here they are Ben. And while you are surfin' the web how about downloading a spell check
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by bblight:
Moore kept asking O'reiley if he would sacrifice his children in Falujah and O'reiley kept answering "I'd sacrifice myself".
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yet O'Reilly stays behind to do his show ...
how brave of him to say that he'd sacrifice himself.
Another cowardly chicken hawk - no wonder the Bush Admin makes him so wet.
Moore kept asking O'reiley if he would sacrifice his children in Falujah and O'reiley kept answering "I'd sacrifice myself".
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yet O'Reilly stays behind to do his show ...
how brave of him to say that he'd sacrifice himself.
Another cowardly chicken hawk - no wonder the Bush Admin makes him so wet.
O'Reilly did a terrible job exposing the moron.
It doesn't mean the morons right.
No one sends their sons to war to die. They go to war to kill and win.
Would moron have said the same thing about WWII?
Morons a piece a shit to act as if he gives a fuk about our troops because no one believe he gives a rats ass. That fat fuk deserves an ass kicking.
It doesn't mean the morons right.
No one sends their sons to war to die. They go to war to kill and win.
Would moron have said the same thing about WWII?
Morons a piece a shit to act as if he gives a fuk about our troops because no one believe he gives a rats ass. That fat fuk deserves an ass kicking.
