Operation "Iraqi Freedom"

Search
Toll in human misery may backfire

WHO voices concern over psychological impact on children

By Vernon Loeb and Jonathan Weisman
THE WASHINGTON POST

April 8 — International health organizations warned yesterday that Baghdad’s hospitals have been overwhelmed by casualties now that fierce urban combat has erupted across Iraq’s capital, with supplies dwindling and medical personnel caught in the crossfire and unable to report to work.

THE World Health Organization in Geneva reported that Baghdad hospitals were seeing 100 combat casualties per hour after a column of U.S. tanks made an initial thrust into the city, and that amputations were apparently being performed without sufficient anesthesia or morphine. WHO spokesman Ian Simpson said doctors and nurses who managed to report for duty at Baghdad hospitals were increasingly finding conditions untenable, with stocks of medicine and supplies — badly depleted by 12 years of international sanctions — vanishing in the crush of civilian and military casualties.

As the death toll climbs and human misery increases, so does concern that the U.S. military may be alienating the populace it says it is liberating, and fueling anger in Arab countries and elsewhere. The WHO also warned yesterday that Iraqi civilian and military casualties will undoubtedly affect the psychological well-being of children, especially in light of the Iraqi military’s heavy reliance on conscripts who often are fathers, uncles and brothers who wanted no part of war.
Defense Department officials have been loathe to estimate a total number of Iraqi military dead. But one senior Pentagon official estimated that between 2,000 and 4,000 Iraqi soldiers had been killed in Baghdad since Saturday. Many more, the official said, have undoubtedly been wounded.

COMBAT DEATHS
U.S. military casualties, by contrast, have been relatively light by historical standards for urban combat. Two soldiers and two Marines were killed in separate attacks yesterday, with six others reported missing and more than 15 wounded.
Those combat deaths were not included in an official Pentagon accounting that listed 89 U.S. fatalities through Sunday, including 73 Americans killed in action and 16 who died in accidents or other incidents since the conflict began March 19. Seven troops are reported missing in action, and seven more are being held by the Iraqis as prisoners of war.
“I predicted there could be anywhere from 100 to 5,000 coalition soldiers killed,” said Michael O’Hanlon, a military analyst at the Brookings Institution. “I saw the number 100 as almost as implausible as 5,000. I am very struck that we are at the lower end of what I thought was a wide plausible range.”
With the long-awaited urban battle for Baghdad underway, increasing the potential for civilian causalities, there has been no reliable estimate of how many Iraqi civilians may have died in the fighting.
The International Committee of the Red Cross has been touring Iraqi hospitals since the war began. But Amanda Williamson, a Red Cross spokeswoman, cautioned that those visits have been primarily in and around Baghdad and Basra, the nation’s two largest cities.

CONCERN OVER PUBLIC HEALTH
An international antiwar consortium, led by Marc Herold, an associate professor of economic development and international affairs at the University of New Hampshire, estimates that between 877 and 1,050 civilians have been killed, based on news reports from Iraq
But there is no independent confirmation of that number from government sources or major non-governmental organizations. During the war in Afghanistan, Herold’s group was criticized for double or even triple counting of casualty reports.
There is little doubt, however, that public health conditions are rapidly deteriorating throughout Iraq, as electric power plants and water pumping facilities are shut down. The WHO reported that 1.5 million people in Basra were without water, and outbreaks of diarrhea have been reported in Basra, Safwan and Nasiriyah.
The WHO’s concern about the emotional well-being of Iraqi children stems from the fact that Iraqi military service is compulsory, with about 274,000 men conscripted annually, according to Anthony Cordesman, a defense analyst at the Center for
Strategic and International Studies. Many of those conscripts were cannon fodder during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, when an estimated 10,000 to 15,000 Iraqi soldiers were killed, said William Arkin, an independent defense analyst who developed some of the most authoritative casualty estimates of that campaign.
“If your point here is to minimize civilian harm, you can’t slaughter military people and think that you’ve evaded that issue,” Arkin said. “They all have families. If we leave thousands or tens of thousands of families without young men, we’re going to pay a price in the postwar period.”
Simpson, the WHO spokesman, echoed his concern. “It’s very easy for the coalition to say we’ve only hit military targets, but you’re still killing people, and people have families. If the aim of your military campaign is to win over the hearts and minds of the people, then killing large numbers of conscripts is not going to help.”

‘AGGRESSIVE BUT JUDICIOUS’
A Pentagon official strongly disagreed, saying that thousands of Iraqi soldiers, out of apparent concern for their families and themselves, have surrendered or put down their weapons and faded into the countryside, as U.S. forces have urged. As for U.S. casualties in Baghdad, defense officials and analysts attributed the relatively light number to a combination of U.S. tactics and Iraqi troops’ inability to fight effectively or exercise central command and control.
Retired Army Gen. Montgomery C. Meigs, a tank commander in the 1991 Gulf War, said U.S. commanders have been using a tactic he called “reconnaissance in force,” probing Iraq’s defenses with armored columns supported by air power.
“Commanders are being aggressive but judicious in what they’ve done,” Meigs said. “You take [the city] a bite at a time, which you can definitely dominate and control. And I think that’s what’s happening. They’re not just going to go wailing in there.”
Randy Gangle, director of the Center for Emerging Threats and Opportunities at the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory, said that a decade of emphasis on urban warfare training is paying dividends, since urban losses historically have run in the range of 30 percent of combatants.
But there is no denying, said Michael Vickers, a former Special Operations officer and CIA operative now at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, that Iraq’s “bizarre” tactics have helped keep U.S. casualties relatively low.
“They lightly defend things and they lose them,” Vickers said. “And then they do headlong counterattacks against them — and they get slaughtered.”
 
Thousands of little Bin Ladens are likely to rise from this.

Call me a cynic, but if some fuk from overseas sanctioned my family into starvation and killed my father I would dedicate my life to destroying them one by one TOO.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Naw, Lander, they only have room for one at the top in those terrorist organizations (they have such big egos, don't you know?) and the Saudis can only support at most a handful of robust ones - the rest will be cannon fodder, since I have hopes the US will cut way down on the terrorist cells in the future here. On the other hand, put them all together to vie for the leadership role and most of them would die in a bloodbath amongst each other fighting to be number 1.

No one, but NO ONE HERE has ever spoken to the 'what if' the war in YOUR view was justified, you agreed we should go and this problem STILL was there - would you ask the same question then or accept it as a risk you had to take? Or does this fear completely rule out any possible action against any Muslim country?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
199
Tokens
Anti-Bin Ladens

BAGHDAD (AFP) - More than 100 children held in a prison celebrated their freedom as US marines rolled into northeast Baghdad amid chaotic scenes which saw civilians loot weapons from an army compound, a US officer said.
Around 150 children spilled out of the jail after the gates were opened as a US military Humvee vehicle approached, Lieutenant Colonel Fred Padilla told an AFP correspondent travelling with the Marines 5th Regiment.
"Hundreds of kids were swarming us and kissing us," Padilla said.
"There were parents running up, so happy to have their kids back."
"The children had been imprisoned because they had not joined the youth branch of the Baath party," he alleged. "Some of these kids had been in there for five years."
The children, who were wearing threadbare clothes and looked under-nourished, walked on the streets crossing their hands as if to mimic handcuffs, before giving the thumbs up sign and shouting their thanks
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
Wouldn't it be "nice" if everyone we helped ended up being our friend?

It makes me wonder if perhaps they rebel against US invention of any kind-- good or bad-- and if this is the case, someday we will realize that it isn't the "other" who is the ingrate, but rather that we are the ones who have taken so long to learn.
 
"Anti-Bin Ladens"

Indeed
icon_rolleyes.gif


3chicos-h.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Seriously, Lander, I believe you've said in the past you could support a war if you truly felt it was necessary - in that event, if it was a Middle Eastern Muslim country (not redundant, considering Israel, but close), exactly what would your viewpoint be on this matter? Would you let that fear dictate that you could never go to war with a Muslim country?
 
"Seriously, Lander, I believe you've said in the past you could support a war if you truly felt it was necessary - in that event, if it was a Middle Eastern Muslim country (not redundant, considering Israel, but close), exactly what would your viewpoint be on this matter? "
If indeed this was a legitimate & just war (which I still strongly believe this is not) then I would sadly have to accept these types of reactions as unfortunate & unavoidable consequences of war. HOWEVER, since this war still IMO has not yet been justified I stand by my position that each death in this war is MURDER - MURDER at the hands of Bush, Wolfowitz, Powell, Rumsfeld BUT not the military (they follow orders, they do not declare war). I doubt that my position on this will be of shock to you.

"Would you let that fear dictate that you could never go to war with a Muslim country?"
No. See above.
I'm not sure I completely agree with the article as I would need to study it further in order to formulate an educated guess on its precision, however I did find it to be an interesting read.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
One other thing - I'm not sure if you ever saw my poll that asked this question:

"Does ANY war justify innocent civilians being accidentally killed?" To date, I believe only two people answered 'no'. But here's the paradox - if you can say that there could exist a war you could support, you'd automatically be answering 'yes' to this question, which would then naturally raise the question of why you're posting pictures like that if you know these deaths like these are unavoidable.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Fair enough - I posted the note above before seeing your response. But I too believe as strongly as you do that this war IS justified, therefore, my thinking is exactly consistent with yours except on this point.

We do have a lot in common, regardless of our point of view on this particular war.
 
Nice post.

I doubt either us will even budge of this issue, but that's what makes democracy so great - WE DON'T HAVE TO!

I suspect you're right in that the majority of our view points will overlap on other issues ... perhaps, we can figure out what the heck Bush was thinking when he purposed that budget
icon_wink.gif
 
to burn America. Seems to make sense and take the fight to them. What am I missing?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Don't confuse me with supporting all of Bush's views - I don't like that cut in funding for the vets and I know when I get a chance to look over all the proposals I won't like others either. But not once in my lifetime have I ever supported someone in all their views whom I voted for - I have a realistic cynicism for politicians, not hate, but a good idea that they have to be watched like little children regardless of the party they're in, or else all the cookies will be gone and not one of the little bastards will admit they were in the kitchen.

later, Lander, heading off now - but I think we'd enjoy discussing this shit over beers and arguing late into the night - a great way to exercise our democratic freedoms - this is exactly the kind of discourse I was seeking when I came in here, to understand the other's viewpoint and respect it without having to agree with it
icon_smile.gif


p.s. Bush 2004 - vote early and often
icon_wink.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
743
Tokens
Lander
I want to commend you for standing up for what you believe in. It takes alot of balls (as an American) to stand tall and stay true to your beliefs. It cannot be easy. Stand firm in the knowledge that those who are against this war are not against the American public, they are not against you, they are against the American foreign policy. All the best Lander.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,572,987
Members
100,865
Latest member
dinnnadna
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com