One-Time GOP Insider Claims He Has Sept. 11 ‘Smoking Gun’

Search
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
Architect of GOP Resurgence Says Boeing 737, not 767, Struck South WTC Tower



By Greg Szymanski A former Republican Party insider turned Bush basher thinks he has stumbled across what may be the “smoking gun,” proving the U.S. government’s official story about the WTC attacks is an “unequivocal lie.”

Karl Schwarz of Little Rock, Ark., who several years ago began exposing corruption amongst the neo-conservative movement in a book entitled A One-Way Ticket to Crawford, Texas, now has set his sights on proving government complicity in 9-11.

For years, the successful business entrepreneur and conservative Republican, once asked by the RNC to run against Bill Clinton for Arkansas governor, has been using his inside political and business clout to expose corruption among the neo-cons in the Bush administration.

He strayed away from the Bush agenda two years after being one of the lead orchestrators in the Republican Party takeover of Congress during the Clinton administration.

“I designed the strategy that took the House and Senate from Clinton,” recalls Schwarz, also a strong supporter and strategist for President George H. W. Bush. “I designed that takeover two years before I realized the Republican ‘Contract with America’ was actually a ‘Contract on America.’ ”

After his political reawakening, Schwarz began blasting the neo-cons where it hurt most—in their pocketbooks—coming forward with evidence regarding oil deals and government involvement with the Taliban and Pakistan.

In his book and his ongoing seven-part series of articles entitled “Pop Goes the Bush Mythology Bubble,” he provides inside information about countless financial scams, essentially revealing that the Bush motive behind the Middle East invasion was more about oil profits than the war on terrorism.

Saying the neo-cons within the government are destroying America for their own corporate-global benefits, Schwarz doesn’t mince words and is calling for the impeachment of Bush, as well as removal of any member of Congress who aids and abets the corrupt powers.

Now, moving away from financial corruption, he has turned his attention to the 9-11 truth movement, saying he has found a piece of obscure video footage that shows that the government lied about what type of plane struck the south tower of the WTC.

Schwarz admits he had a “whole lot” of luck when running across the video footage in a French foreign film entitled The Barbarian Invasion.

Contained in the film unrelated to 9-11, is a 1 minute, 52 second, video segment, shot by an unknown amateur photographer at the WTC, which Schwartz says clearly shows a Boeing 737 airliner striking the south tower.

“We tracked down the filmmaker and he acquired the original WTC segment from the Canadian News Service,” said Schwarz, adding that he has had the tape analyzed by experts proving it’s not a fake. “We are tracking down the original photographer and want to get to him before the government does in order to prove its authenticity.

“This segment, however, conclusively shows a 737 hit the south tower, not a 767 as previously reported. This in itself should be the smoking gun, which proves the whole story given to us by the government about 9-11 is untrue.”

Originally, the government claimed the second jetliner en route to Los Angeles was a Boeing 767. However, Schwarz said the video will not only show the airline dimensions to be those of a 737, but that he also has evidence that the engine recovered in the WTC wreckage was a model type CFM56, which propels a 737, not a 767.

“Not even two CFM56’s could get a 767 off the ground,” added Schwartz.
Besides 9-11, Schwartz said three major areas that need to be thoroughly investigated regarding the Bush administration’s present policies include:

• Administration ties with Afghanistan, the Taliban and the Bridas Corp. Schwarz claims a high-ranking Bridas executive is one of his main sources, implicating the Bush administration with corruption involving the Taliban and the Afghan invasion.

• Information implicating 9-11 commission members with direct and indirect financial benefits due to the Bush policies in the Middle East.

“Whistleblowers Sibel Edmonds, Karen Kwiatkowski and others whom I cannot disclose without jeopardizing their safety, including many members of the armed services, have acted as my main sources,” said Schwarz.

Asked how he would describe himself, since many critics may consider him a disgruntled Republican, he said:

“I am conservative, fiscally responsible, an ecumenical Christian and an American patriot who clearly understands fascism and clearly sees this is exactly what is going on within the Bush administration.

“To answer my critics, they can say whatever. However, those who read my book will clearly see that the main problem now facing America has been caused and amplified by the last three presidential administrations, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II.”
 
Roxygurl

Roxygurl

RELAX,im just having fun
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,042
Reaction score
0
stucco43 said:
Architect of GOP Resurgence Says Boeing 737, not 767, Struck South WTC Tower



By Greg Szymanski A former Republican Party insider turned Bush basher thinks he has stumbled across what may be the “smoking gun,” proving the U.S. government’s official story about the WTC attacks is an “unequivocal lie.”

Karl Schwarz of Little Rock, Ark., who several years ago began exposing corruption amongst the neo-conservative movement in a book entitled A One-Way Ticket to Crawford, Texas, now has set his sights on proving government complicity in 9-11.

For years, the successful business entrepreneur and conservative Republican, once asked by the RNC to run against Bill Clinton for Arkansas governor, has been using his inside political and business clout to expose corruption among the neo-cons in the Bush administration.

He strayed away from the Bush agenda two years after being one of the lead orchestrators in the Republican Party takeover of Congress during the Clinton administration.

“I designed the strategy that took the House and Senate from Clinton,” recalls Schwarz, also a strong supporter and strategist for President George H. W. Bush. “I designed that takeover two years before I realized the Republican ‘Contract with America’ was actually a ‘Contract on America.’ ”

After his political reawakening, Schwarz began blasting the neo-cons where it hurt most—in their pocketbooks—coming forward with evidence regarding oil deals and government involvement with the Taliban and Pakistan.

In his book and his ongoing seven-part series of articles entitled “Pop Goes the Bush Mythology Bubble,” he provides inside information about countless financial scams, essentially revealing that the Bush motive behind the Middle East invasion was more about oil profits than the war on terrorism.

Saying the neo-cons within the government are destroying America for their own corporate-global benefits, Schwarz doesn’t mince words and is calling for the impeachment of Bush, as well as removal of any member of Congress who aids and abets the corrupt powers.

Now, moving away from financial corruption, he has turned his attention to the 9-11 truth movement, saying he has found a piece of obscure video footage that shows that the government lied about what type of plane struck the south tower of the WTC.

Schwarz admits he had a “whole lot” of luck when running across the video footage in a French foreign film entitled The Barbarian Invasion.

Contained in the film unrelated to 9-11, is a 1 minute, 52 second, video segment, shot by an unknown amateur photographer at the WTC, which Schwartz says clearly shows a Boeing 737 airliner striking the south tower.

“We tracked down the filmmaker and he acquired the original WTC segment from the Canadian News Service,” said Schwarz, adding that he has had the tape analyzed by experts proving it’s not a fake. “We are tracking down the original photographer and want to get to him before the government does in order to prove its authenticity.

“This segment, however, conclusively shows a 737 hit the south tower, not a 767 as previously reported. This in itself should be the smoking gun, which proves the whole story given to us by the government about 9-11 is untrue.”

Originally, the government claimed the second jetliner en route to Los Angeles was a Boeing 767. However, Schwarz said the video will not only show the airline dimensions to be those of a 737, but that he also has evidence that the engine recovered in the WTC wreckage was a model type CFM56, which propels a 737, not a 767.

“Not even two CFM56’s could get a 767 off the ground,” added Schwartz.
Besides 9-11, Schwartz said three major areas that need to be thoroughly investigated regarding the Bush administration’s present policies include:

• Administration ties with Afghanistan, the Taliban and the Bridas Corp. Schwarz claims a high-ranking Bridas executive is one of his main sources, implicating the Bush administration with corruption involving the Taliban and the Afghan invasion.

• Information implicating 9-11 commission members with direct and indirect financial benefits due to the Bush policies in the Middle East.

“Whistleblowers Sibel Edmonds, Karen Kwiatkowski and others whom I cannot disclose without jeopardizing their safety, including many members of the armed services, have acted as my main sources,” said Schwarz.

Asked how he would describe himself, since many critics may consider him a disgruntled Republican, he said:

“I am conservative, fiscally responsible, an ecumenical Christian and an American patriot who clearly understands fascism and clearly sees this is exactly what is going on within the Bush administration.

“To answer my critics, they can say whatever. However, those who read my book will clearly see that the main problem now facing America has been caused and amplified by the last three presidential administrations, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II.”
wow. im sure the families of those lost in the south tower can sleep better knowing they died from a 737 hitting the tower and not a 767.glad we cleared that up. that george he just keeps ya guessing.lol.:drink: :drink: :drink: oy vey:ohno:
 
docmercer--banned

docmercer--banned

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Reaction score
0
Yeah, and that hole in the Pentagon was big enough for a jet??? ... and many reports that our fighter jets were to "back down" on that morning ... and Bernie Kerik just happens to find a passport of one of the hijackers in the WTC rubble 2 blocks away??

Sorry, 11-22 and 9-11 are 2 dates in the history of this country where the word coverup is deft in play
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
Roxy,
U seem pretty bright and trully love America....so why arent we asking more questions as a society....they spend $43 million on monica and less on the investigation for 911.....
God help us!!!!
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
also Doc its now public knowledge our friend and Vice Pres was running the war games that day and was the one who had the control to call down....
You dont think Vice Pres Cheney is involved in 911 do u...
Once Again God help us!!!!!
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
Roxy,
also the families that lived around ground zero and the fire fighters were happy the same guilty people that created 911 informed the citizens of New York you can go back to your homes the air quality is good to breath....
this later was revealed to be totally false and fabricated...
and these guys are heros....guilliani, bush, whitman, geez the list goes on and on and on...
oh yea...it was pretty nice for Joel SilverStien to insure the trade center for $7 billion dollars on a insurance policy....
i think this is bigger issue than a friggen jet or what size it is...why are we focusing on certain parts of the official version of 911 and not look at the facts and end result...
anyone that hasnt taken time to research this and doesnt have any questions i feel sorry for....You can fool most americans most of the time.. but not me by far....as G.W. said Bringem on!!!!
 
JinnRikki

JinnRikki

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Reaction score
1
<TABLE height=121 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY>

<CENTER><TR><TD align=middle bgColor=#f3f3f3 colSpan=2 height=38>They don't talk about it on TV anymore, but someone tried to make money with unusual stock trades right before the terrorist attacks of September 11. Who knew to bet that United Airlines would lose money?[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] [/font]</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Suppressed[/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA’s Highest Ranks<O:p> [/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]CIA Executive Director “Buzzy” Krongard managed firm that handled “PUT” options on United Airline Stock<O:p> [/font][font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif][/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]by<O:p> Michael C. Ruppert<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O /><O:p> </O:p><O:p> [/font]
[font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif][/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]FTW - October 9, 2001 – Although uniformly ignored by the mainstream U.S. media, there is abundant and clear evidence that a number of transactions in financial markets indicated specific (criminal) foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. In the case of at least one of these trades -- which has left a $2.5 million prize unclaimed -- the firm used to place the “put options” on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by the man who is now in the number three Executive Director position at the Central Intelligence Agency. [/font][font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif] [/font]

[font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif][/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Until 1997 A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard had been Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown. A.B. Brown was acquired by Banker’s Trust in 1997. Krongard then became, as part of the merger, Vice Chairman of Banker’s Trust-AB Brown, one of 20 major U.S. banks named by Senator Carl Levin this year as being connected to money laundering. Krongard’s last position at Banker’s Trust (BT) was to oversee “private client relations.” In this capacity he had direct hands-on relations with some of the wealthiest people in the world in a kind of specialized banking operation that has been identified by the U.S. Senate and other investigators as being closely connected to the laundering of drug money.<O:p> </O:p><O:p> [/font][font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif][/font]
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top bgColor=#ffffff>
<CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="95%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Krongard joined the CIA in 1998 as counsel to CIA Director George Tenet. He was promoted to CIA Executive Director by President Bush in March of this year. BT was acquired by Deutsche Bank in 1999. The combined firm is the single largest bank in Europe. And, as we shall see, Deutsche Bank played several key roles in events connected to the September 11 attacks.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]THE SCOPE OF KNOWN INSIDER TRADING </O:p><O:p></O:p></B>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Before looking further into these relationships it is necessary to look at the insider trading information that is being ignored by Reuters, The New York Times and other mass media. It is well documented that the CIA has long monitored such trades – in real time – as potential warnings of terrorist attacks and other economic moves contrary to U.S. interests. Previous stories in FTW have specifically highlighted the use of Promis software to monitor such trades. <O:p> </O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It is necessary to understand only two key financial terms to understand the significance of these trades, “selling short” and “put options”. <O:p></O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]“Selling Short” is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months. [/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]“Put Options,” are contracts giving the buyer the option to sell stocks at a later date. Purchased at nominal prices of, for example, $1.00 per share, they are sold in blocks of 100 shares. If exercised, they give the holder the option of selling selected stocks at a future date at a price set when the contract is issued. Thus, for an investment of $10,000 it might be possible to tie up 10,000 shares of United or American Airlines at $100 per share, and the seller of the option is then obligated to buy them if the option is executed. If the stock has fallen to $50 when the contract matures, the holder of the option can purchase the shares for $50 and immediately sell them for $100 – regardless of where the market then stands. A call option is the reverse of a put option, which is, in effect, a derivatives bet that the stock price will go up.<O:p> </O:p><O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled “Black Tuesday: The World’s Largest Insider Trading Scam?” documented the following trades connected to the September 11 attacks:<O:p> [/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] - Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options… Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost $5 million.<O:p> </O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]- On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;… Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about $4 million.<O:p> </O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]- [The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.]<O:p> </O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]- No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.<O:p> </O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]- Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 2,157 of its October $45 put options bought in the three trading days before Black Tuesday; this compares to an average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley’s share price fell from $48.90 to $42.50 in the aftermath of the attacks. Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts were bought based upon knowledge of the approaching attacks, their purchasers could have profited by at least $1.2 million.<O:p> Merrill Lynch & Co., with headquarters near the Twin Towers, saw 12,215 October $45 put options bought in the four trading days before the attacks; the previous average volume in those shares had been 252 contracts per day [a 1200% increase!]. When trading resumed, Merrill’s shares fell from $46.88 to $41.50; assuming that 11,000 option contracts were bought by “insiders,” their profit would have been about $5.5 million.<O:p> </O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]- European regulators are examining trades in Germany’s Munich Re, Switzerland’s Swiss Re, and AXA of France, all major reinsurers with exposure to the Black Tuesday disaster. [FTW Note: AXA also owns more than 25% of American Airlines stock making the attacks a “double whammy” for them.]<O:p> </O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]On September 29, 2001 – in a vital story that has gone unnoticed by the major media – the San Francisco Chronicle reported, “Investors have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profits they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11, terrorist attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market data.<O:p> </O:p><O:p>[/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]“The uncollected money raises suspicions that the investors – whose identities and nationalities have not been made public – had advance knowledge of the strikes.” They don’t dare show up now. The suspension of trading for four days after the attacks made it impossible to cash-out quickly and claim the prize before investigators started looking.<O:p> </O:p><O:p> [/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]“… October series options for UAL Corp. were purchased in highly unusual volumes three trading days before the terrorist attacks for a total outlay of $2,070; investors bought the option contracts, each representing 100 shares, for 90 cents each. [This represents 230,000 shares]. Those options are now selling at more than $12 each. There are still 2,313 so-called “put” options outstanding [valued at $2.77 million and representing 231,300 shares] according to the Options Clearinghouse Corp.”<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]“…The source familiar with the United trades identified Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, as the investment bank used to purchase at least some of these options…” This was the operation managed by Krongard until as recently as 1998.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]As reported in other news stories, Deutsche Bank was also the hub of insider trading activity connected to Munich Re. just before the attacks.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]CIA, THE BANKS AND THE BROKERS<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Understanding the interrelationships between CIA and the banking and brokerage world is critical to grasping the already frightening implications of the above revelations. Let’s look at the history of CIA, Wall Street and the big banks by looking at some of the key players in CIA’s history.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Clark Clifford – The National Security Act of 1947 was written by Clark Clifford, a Democratic Party powerhouse, former Secretary of Defense, and one-time advisor to President Harry Truman. In the 1980s, as Chairman of First American Bancshares, Clifford was instrumental in getting the corrupt CIA drug bank BCCI a license to operate on American shores. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and banker.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]John Foster and Allen Dulles – These two brothers “designed” the CIA for Clifford. Both were active in intelligence operations during WW II. Allen Dulles was the U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland where he met frequently with Nazi leaders and looked after U.S. investments in Germany. John Foster went on to become Secretary of State under Dwight Eisenhower and Allen went on to serve as CIA Director under Eisenhower and was later fired by JFK. Their professions: partners in the most powerful - to this day - Wall Street law firm of Sullivan, Cromwell.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Bill Casey – Ronald Reagan’s CIA Director and OSS veteran who served as chief wrangler during the Iran-Contra years was, under President Richard Nixon, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and stockbroker.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]David Doherty - The current Vice President of the New York Stock Exchange for enforcement is the retired General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]George Herbert Walker Bush – President from 1989 to January 1993, also served as CIA Director for 13 months from 1976-7. He is now a paid consultant to the Carlyle Group, the 11<SUP>th</SUP> largest defense contractor in the nation, which also shares joint investments with the bin Laden family.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard – The current Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is the former Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown and former Vice Chairman of Banker’s Trust.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]John Deutch - This retired CIA Director from the Clinton Administration currently sits on the board at Citigroup, the nation’s second largest bank, which has been repeatedly and overtly involved in the documented laundering of drug money. This includes Citigroup’s 2001 purchase of a Mexican bank known to launder drug money, Banamex.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Nora Slatkin – This retired CIA Executive Director also sits on Citibank’s board.<O:p> </O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Maurice “Hank” Greenburg – The CEO of AIG insurance, manager of the third largest capital investment pool in the world, was floated as a possible CIA Director in 1995. FTW exposed Greenberg’s and AIG’s long connection to CIA drug trafficking and covert operations in a two-part series that was interrupted just prior to the attacks of September 11. AIG’s stock has bounced back remarkably well since the attacks. To read that story, please go to [/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]http://www.copvcia.com/stories/part_2.html[/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]. <O:p></O:p><O:p></O:p>[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]One wonders how much damning evidence is necessary to respond to what is now irrefutable proof that CIA knew about the attacks and did not stop them. Whatever our government is doing, whatever the CIA is doing, it is clearly NOT in the interests of the American people, especially those who died on September 11.[/font]

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>​
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></O:p></O:p></O:p></O:p></O:p></O:p></O:p></O:p></O:p>
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
yeah from the information i have seen Elliot Spitzer uncovered some of this and is sitting on top of the information....isnt this so obvious to a normal american....to trully defend these criminals is disgusting
 
Ego74

Ego74

The Straightshooter
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
7,118
Reaction score
1
"A former Republican Party insider turned Bush basher".....

pretty much sums it up.

Too bad some people have forgotten about what really that day really meant for America. Most people feel sadness when they reflect on 9/11. Others feel anger towards Al Qaeda....seems like for a few others, it's another opprotunity to bash Bush and spew their Micheal Moore conspiracy theories. Very sad indeed.

Kinda like the people who think Christmas is about "gettin' presents".
 
JudgeWapner

JudgeWapner

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Reaction score
10
Ego

Say what you want, but alot of sh*t just don't add up.
 
edub69

edub69

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,443
Reaction score
0
ego74 said:
"A former Republican Party insider turned Bush basher".....

pretty much sums it up.

That's a typical Republican response. If you don't like what someone is saying, god forbid you should try to rebut their arguments. Much more convenient to try to cast doubt on the person making the claim. Why do you think this person turned into a Bush basher in the first place?
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
edub69 said:
That's a typical Republican response. If you don't like what someone is saying, god forbid you should try to rebut their arguments. Much more convenient to try to cast doubt on the person making the claim. Why do you think this person turned into a Bush basher in the first place?
well said...mr edub69.....long live Freebird!!!!!!
 
Ego74

Ego74

The Straightshooter
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
7,118
Reaction score
1
edub69 said:
Why do you think this person turned into a Bush basher in the first place?

Doc "doctored" his koolaid???
 
Ego74

Ego74

The Straightshooter
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
7,118
Reaction score
1
If the article above was about Bill Clinton, and the first line read " A former Democratic insider turned Clinton basher", that would pretty much kill their credibility as well.
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
ego what does this have to do with this post? the topic has to do with 911....and by the way fvck clinton and his carpet munching whore....she should of spoken up for New Yorkers at least in regard to air quality...
 
Roxygurl

Roxygurl

RELAX,im just having fun
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,042
Reaction score
0
stucco43 said:
Roxy,
U seem pretty bright and trully love America....so why arent we asking more questions as a society....they spend $43 million on monica and less on the investigation for 911.....
God help us!!!!
stucco43 if i were to tell you my thoughts on whats happening to my country the last 20 years id be here all night.ive read every thread in this forum and theres some incredibly intelligent people here. they spend 43 mil on monica cuz the sheeple of america only care about having the coffee ready in the morning and getting laid after work. in other countries the people take to the streets.if terri schindler didnt get the masses to protest nothing will.:sad3: ~RG
 
Woody0

Woody0

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
6,480
Reaction score
1
roxygurl said:
...they died from a 737 hitting the tower and not a 767.

The image, played so many times, of that plane hitting the South Tower is one I shall never forget. It was not a 737. The idea is ridiculous.
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
Yea and the image of the poor people having to jump out of the window really tore my heart....and i imagine Bush and his buddys were sitting back and enjoying this sickness!!!...
 
TheRightWing

TheRightWing

Wooooooooh Nelly look em' go!!!
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,277
Reaction score
0
stucco43 said:
Yea and the image of the poor people having to jump out of the window really tore my heart....and i imagine Bush and his buddys were sitting back and enjoying this sickness!!!...


With comments like that no wonder why no one takes anything you say seriously. God bless all of us your living in Costa Rica!
 
stucco43

stucco43

Long live Freedom of Speech
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
0
Right Wing i left america in 1999 because of americans like you. They are totally consumed in consumption and materializm., I wont even bring up the issue with most american woman losing thier feminity.
SO i live in a country that isnt agressive and doesnt have a military. Every woman here is sexy and understands the beauty and power of a true woman....very simply i live the life most americans fantasy about....
so for you to say you dont take me seriously is an honor and totally shows how consumed you are with supporting these criminals ...i guess all this went over your head...huh????....
unlike you Right wing...i have one of the largest import and distribution construction companys in latin america and most of your type end up asking me for a job...so what else u need.....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,141,206
Messages
13,916,697
Members
104,790
Latest member
JBriggs1991
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com