Ok, time to throw in the towel.... actual evidence of obstruction and colluding with Russians...

Search

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
56,956
Reaction score
16,703
:hahahahah

Ding-donger claims he's all for due process. Well, these bogus charges would be laughed out of every court. That's why Mueller punted, but the fringe conspiracy nutters are too ding-dong to figure that out.
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,529
Reaction score
1,030
Poor GasMan -- can have an orgasm unless he's looking at child porn.

And there you go bringing it up again. What is this the 5th or 6th time you have gone there? Almost like it's all you think about.

You're a sick fuck-O.
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,529
Reaction score
1,030
LOL Your best counter-point is "He lied" ??? BWAHAHAHAHAH Fucking weak and pathetic.

You forgot to adddress:
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort, **REDACTED**
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
L. Overarching Factual Issues

Actually you CAN obstruct an investigation into whether a crime was committed. They are OBSTRUCTING THE PROCESS. Whether that process delivers a conviction or not, the process must not be impeded or tampered with.

For the record, I am so glad that the 'genetically superior' gambling degens on this site are able to offer their expert legal-mansplaining services.

You guys are a bunch of twats and your opinion thankfully means SHIT because in the real world of LAW and ORDER there are consequences for obstruction and contempt.

You think this shit is going away any time soon? The impeachment train is just getting started and I'm loving every minute of you Forever-Trumpers losing your mind over it.

You mean like deleting subpoenaed emails and destroying cell phones with hammers?
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
89,668
Reaction score
4,104
And there you go bringing it up again. What is this the 5th or 6th time you have gone there? Almost like it's all you think about.

You're a sick fuck-O.

Gasman's wife is beautiful, better than anything donger the fucking idiot can ever fantasy about

loser's in life and pretty girls are incompatible, it's genetics
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Reaction score
261
Ding-donger claims he's all for due process. Well, these bogus charges would be laughed out of every court. That's why Mueller punted, but the fringe conspiracy nutters are too ding-dong to figure that out.

I am all for due process. That's what impeachment hearings are for -- to consider the evidence of obstruction provided by Mueller.

I know this stuff is hard to grasp with all the inbreeding and subpar education.


And there you go bringing it up again. What is this the 5th or 6th time you have gone there? Almost like it's all you think about.

You're a sick fuck-O.

I only think about it when I see your name. Instant word association: GasMan <--> Pedo
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
56,956
Reaction score
16,703
I am all for due process. That's what impeachment hearings are for -- to consider the evidence of obstruction provided by Mueller.

I know this stuff is hard to grasp with all the inbreeding and subpar education.

Impeachment is a political process, not a legal one, conspiracy nutter.

There is no evidence. It's all innuendo and cooked up lies without any proof, just as I predicted the M̶u̶e̶l̶l̶e̶r̶ Weissmann report would be.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
11
LOL Your best counter-point is "He lied" ??? BWAHAHAHAHAH Fucking weak and pathetic.

You forgot to adddress:
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort, **REDACTED**
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
L. Overarching Factual Issues

Actually you CAN obstruct an investigation into whether a crime was committed. They are OBSTRUCTING THE PROCESS. Whether that process delivers a conviction or not, the process must not be impeded or tampered with.

For the record, I am so glad that the 'genetically superior' gambling degens on this site are able to offer their expert legal-mansplaining services.

You guys are a bunch of twats and your opinion thankfully means SHIT because in the real world of LAW and ORDER there are consequences for obstruction and contempt.

You think this shit is going away any time soon? The impeachment train is just getting started and I'm loving every minute of you Forever-Trumpers losing your mind over it.

You sound like the shithead at some other site that was trying to convince me that there CAN be obstruction with no crime because someone could purposefully trip a cop who was chasing a suspect that is later found innocent. You literally sound *that* stupid. But that's also what makes you who are, too dumb to know how dumb you truly are! I'm for impeaching Trump more than you are because it will go through the House on a party line vote, fail in the Senate, will absolutely hand Trump the 2020 election on a silver platter, and will also put Rebeplicans back in the majority in the House. That is how impeaching Trump will turn out for the Dummycrats and I will bump this thread when it does.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
11
You mean like deleting subpoenaed emails and destroying cell phones with hammers?

Isn't it sad how quickly the shitheel hypocrite liberals change the definition of "obstruction of justice"?

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her classified email, was that true?
COMEY: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.

GOWDY: ...Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received, was that true?
COMEY: That's not true.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email, there is no classified material," was that true?
COMEY: There was classified material emailed.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device, was that true?
COMEY: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department, was that true?
COMEY: No, we found work-related emails--thousands--that were not returned.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account, was that true?
COMEY: ...There's no doubt there were work-related emails that were removed electronically from the email system.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive, did her lawyers read the email content individually?
COMEY: No.

GOWDY: …I’m going to ask you to put on your old hat. False exculpatory statements — they are used for what?
COMEY: Well, either for a substantive prosecution, or for evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution.

GOWDY: Exactly. Intent, and consciousness of guilt, right? Is that right?
COMEY: Right.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Reaction score
31
Isn't it sad how quickly the shitheel hypocrite liberals change the definition of "obstruction of justice"?

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her classified email, was that true?
COMEY: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.

GOWDY: ...Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received, was that true?
COMEY: That's not true.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email, there is no classified material," was that true?
COMEY: There was classified material emailed.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device, was that true?
COMEY: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department, was that true?
COMEY: No, we found work-related emails--thousands--that were not returned.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account, was that true?
COMEY: ...There's no doubt there were work-related emails that were removed electronically from the email system.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive, did her lawyers read the email content individually?
COMEY: No.

GOWDY: …I’m going to ask you to put on your old hat. False exculpatory statements — they are used for what?
COMEY: Well, either for a substantive prosecution, or for evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution.

GOWDY: Exactly. Intent, and consciousness of guilt, right? Is that right?
COMEY: Right.
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]And the Democrats want to impeach Trump. It doesn't get any better than that. [/FONT]
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Reaction score
31
So we know who controls the narrative in this country & its the communist democrats .....
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Communism is all but dead and so is the Democratic party.

Of the countries that claim to be communist, China, Cuba,
North Korea, Laos, and Vietnam only Cuba and North Korea
are true communist countries. All the others participate
in capitalism to some extent.
[/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
27,171
Reaction score
1,854
For the record, I am so glad that the 'genetically superior' gambling degens on this site are able to offer their expert legal-mansplaining services.

You guys are a bunch of twats and your opinion thankfully means SHIT because in the real world of LAW and ORDER there are consequences for obstruction and contempt.

.


Uh, you're offering legal hot takes when you have neither the education or experience to do so.

Are you retarded?
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Reaction score
261
You sound like the shithead at some other site that was trying to convince me that there CAN be obstruction with no crime because someone could purposefully trip a cop who was chasing a suspect that is later found innocent. You literally sound *that* stupid. But that's also what makes you who are, too dumb to know how dumb you truly are! I'm for impeaching Trump more than you are because it will go through the House on a party line vote, fail in the Senate, will absolutely hand Trump the 2020 election on a silver platter, and will also put Rebeplicans back in the majority in the House. That is how impeaching Trump will turn out for the Dummycrats and I will bump this thread when it does.

It must be exhausting to perform the mental gymnastics necessary to think that Trump didn't obstruction justice and that impeaching him will somehow propel him to a re-election bid like his hero Bill Clinton did.

The difference? Bill Clinton lied about a blowjob. Your guy tried to impede the investigation into Russian election interference by attempting to coerce witnesses and by firing or attempting to fire those involved with the investigation. If they vote to impeach him in the House, I'm sure more than a few Republicans will vote that way as well. If Moscow Mitch and band of Russian stooges want to hold a kangaroo court and let Trump off the hook -- that vote will be public and the electorate can decide what to do from there.

Not to mention, I'm sure all the EXONERATING redacted details of the Mueller report will be made public that shows the Trump campaigns willful ignorance when it came to RUSSIA HELPING TRUMP GET ELECTED (i'm quoting Trump here).
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Reaction score
261
Isn't it sad how quickly the shitheel hypocrite liberals change the definition of "obstruction of justice"?

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her classified email, was that true?
COMEY: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.

GOWDY: ...Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received, was that true?
COMEY: That's not true.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email, there is no classified material," was that true?
COMEY: There was classified material emailed.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device, was that true?
COMEY: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said all work-related emails were returned to the State Department, was that true?
COMEY: No, we found work-related emails--thousands--that were not returned.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related emails from her personal account, was that true?
COMEY: ...There's no doubt there were work-related emails that were removed electronically from the email system.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive, did her lawyers read the email content individually?
COMEY: No.

GOWDY: …I’m going to ask you to put on your old hat. False exculpatory statements — they are used for what?
COMEY: Well, either for a substantive prosecution, or for evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution.

GOWDY: Exactly. Intent, and consciousness of guilt, right? Is that right?
COMEY: Right.

Republicans should have convicted her. Either Clinton was innocent or the GOP incompetent. Gowdy looks a bit inbred to me -- wouldn't rule it out.

Really wish they had done their job and prosecuted her.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Reaction score
261
Uh, you're offering legal hot takes when you have neither the education or experience to do so.

Are you retarded?

No. I'm connected. How many of your friends are sitting judges or lawyers?
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
56,956
Reaction score
16,703
Akphidelt/ding-donger/Pavian: Trump should be impeached for attempting to obstruct an investigation of a crime committed by Democrats.

I'm connected!

face)(*^%
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,140,263
Messages
13,901,500
Members
104,671
Latest member
ontheflowservices
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com