Trends, humor me, and view the Mueller report: https://justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
Scroll to PDF page 209 to view the table of comments and tell me what starts on page 15.
II. FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President' s Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia
D . Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Comey
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
G. The President's Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016 Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort, **REDACTED**
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
L. Overarching Factual Issues
I recommend reading it. Especially item L.
Scroll to PDF page 209 to view the table of comments and tell me what starts on page 15.
II. FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President' s Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia
D . Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Comey
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
G. The President's Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016 Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort, **REDACTED**
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
L. Overarching Factual Issues
I recommend reading it. Especially item L.
It is beyond laughable at this point, especially considering there was no "Russia collusion"
Even the Richard Madcow conspiracy nutters are tuning out.
Russia Hoax Queen Rachel Maddow’s Ratings Crash to Trump-Era Low
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/06/04/nolte-russia-hoax-queen-rachel-maddows-ratings-crash-to-
trump-era-low/
Poor Donger - doesnt even know
That the Mueller report was just caught omitting exculpatory evidence in a conversation with Trump and Flynn's lawyer way back when. They provided a "transcript" of a phone call between the two trying to establish some type of obstruction participation, yet the part of the transcript left out debunks the entire premise of the phone call and it's intent.
Yet Donger just keeps on believing the lies. Doesn't even realize the "obstruction" part of the paper which is an opinion based charge was all based on bullshit.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...e-coming-that-shows-mueller-report-is-a-fraud
That the Mueller report was just caught omitting exculpatory evidence in a conversation with Trump and Flynn's lawyer way back when. They provided a "transcript" of a phone call between the two trying to establish some type of obstruction participation, yet the part of the transcript left out debunks the entire premise of the phone call and it's intent.
Yet Donger just keeps on believing the lies. Doesn't even realize the "obstruction" part of the paper which is an opinion based charge was all based on bullshit.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...e-coming-that-shows-mueller-report-is-a-fraud
You cannot obstruct an investigation that is LOOKING for a crime and here are some more factual results of the other obstruction investigation:
A. Mueller intentionally withheld exculpatory evidence in the case against Gen Flynn, textbook obstruction.
B. Mueller is (still) withholding evidence from Stone's lawyers that they are entitled to see (proof the DNC server was hacked by Russians)
C. Mueller lied about who Joseph Mifsud is
D. Mueller lied about Papadopolous
E. Mueller lied about Carter Page
F. Mueller lied about the DNC server hack
G. Mueller lied about who Giorgi Rtskhiladze is
That's just what's been exposed since he released his report. How much longer before we're going AA, BB, CC? A pile of horseshit. Democrats are already kicking themselves for saying "we need to trust Mueller." They are just starting to realize he kicked them in the balls and ran. Where is that fat fuck Nadless with his subpoenas and contempt threats now, the hypocrite! He knows, at this point, he has no choice but to protect Mueller from the Republicans. They would wreck him.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Messages
- 89,631
- Reaction score
- 4,090
A few fucking idiots will hold on to Trump committed some crime just like a few conspiracy theorists still think Bush and/or Cheney planned the 9/11 attacks. The epitome of ignorance, and you can't reason with a cement wall
All the ACTUAL facts be damned, all one really needs is some minimal critical thinking skill set to see the truth. Throw in the fact that democratic leaders are in full retreat, and it should be clear to everyone with a brain wave. You have to be a special sort of stupid to miss all this
My analogy; Hitler is in a bunker in Berlin while his capital is being destroyed and he's surrounded by the Allies, yet he still thinks he's winning. Yes, Donger the Nazi is that delusional
All the ACTUAL facts be damned, all one really needs is some minimal critical thinking skill set to see the truth. Throw in the fact that democratic leaders are in full retreat, and it should be clear to everyone with a brain wave. You have to be a special sort of stupid to miss all this
My analogy; Hitler is in a bunker in Berlin while his capital is being destroyed and he's surrounded by the Allies, yet he still thinks he's winning. Yes, Donger the Nazi is that delusional
It doesn't matter if a crime is committed or not. Obstructing an investigation that would ultimately clear someone of some crime is still .... A CRIME.
FYI - Witness tampering/intimidation or coercing witness testimony is also under the umbrella of obstruction.
The ACTUAL FACTS are detailed in the Mueller report. I suggest you read them... PDF page 209 of https://justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
Starting with II. FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION
LOL Your best counter-point is "He lied" ??? BWAHAHAHAHAH Fucking weak and pathetic.
You forgot to adddress:
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort, **REDACTED**
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
L. Overarching Factual Issues
Actually you CAN obstruct an investigation into whether a crime was committed. They are OBSTRUCTING THE PROCESS. Whether that process delivers a conviction or not, the process must not be impeded or tampered with.
For the record, I am so glad that the 'genetically superior' gambling degens on this site are able to offer their expert legal-mansplaining services.
You guys are a bunch of twats and your opinion thankfully means SHIT because in the real world of LAW and ORDER there are consequences for obstruction and contempt.
You think this shit is going away any time soon? The impeachment train is just getting started and I'm loving every minute of you Forever-Trumpers losing your mind over it.
