Oh Shock: US Government Botched Dietary Guidelines

[Acebb]

Probably because they are very smart people making informed decisions with science and stuff:

Zoe Harcombe, a researcher and Ph.D. candidate at University of the West of Scotland, and her colleagues say that the data decision makers had in 1977, when the first U.S. guidelines on dietary fat were made, did not provide any support for the idea that eating less fat would translate to fewer cases of heart disease, or that it would save lives.

[FONT=georgia, serif]“[/FONT]The bottom line is that there wasn’t evidence for those guidelines to be introduced[FONT=georgia, serif],” she says. “One of the most important things that should have underpinned the guidelines is sound nutritional knowledge, [/FONT]and that was distinctly lacking[FONT=georgia, serif].”
[/FONT]The problem, as Harcombe notes in her study, is that advice was “arbitrary. The 30% wasn’t tested, let alone proven,” she says.

[FONT=georgia, serif]==[/FONT]
[FONT=georgia, serif][Abstract of the paper][/FONT]

Sound familiar? Gee, which other issues does this remind you of?

Don't worry, they are going to tell you later this year it is ok to eat eggs again.

 

[SheriffJoe]

but, but, but...

"educated people making intelligent informed decisions!"

 

[superbeets]

We got the same bad advice 6 years later in 1983


[h=1]Butter ISN'T bad for you after all: Major study says 80s advice on dairy fats was flawed[/h]

• Dietary advice from 1983 ordered cut of dairy fats and increase of carbs
• UK and US governments 'practically destroyed' dairy industry with advice
• Advice to eat more carbs 'to blame for obesity and diabetes epidemic'

PUBLISHED: 23:29, 9 February 2015 | UPDATED: 14:34, 10 February 2015


Guidelines that told millions of people to avoid butter and full-fat milk should never have been introduced, say experts.


The startling assertion challenges advice that has been followed by the medical profession for 30 years.


The experts say the advice from 1983, aimed at reducing deaths from heart disease, lacked any solid trial evidence to back it up.

The guidelines – the first of their kind – were introduced when as much as one-fifth of the average British diet was saturated fat such as butter, cream and fattier cuts of meat.


Britons were advised by an official dietary committee to cut their fat intake to 30 per cent of total energy and saturated fat intake to 10 per cent, while increasing the amount of carbohydrate they ate.

 

[superbeets]

This led food makers to create low-fat spreads, including cholesterol-lowering products, while consumers shunned cheese, milk and cream.


However, now some scientists even say the advice is responsible – in part – for the obesity crisis because it encouraged an increase in carbohydrate in our diets.


A new review says evidence from trials did not support the advice. It says it is ‘incomprehensible’ that such advice was introduced for 56million Britons in 1983 and 220million Americans six years earlier ‘given the contrary results from a small number of unhealthy men’.

+2



Guidelines from the 1980s that told millions to avoid butter and full-fat milk, should never have been introduced and experts say it lacked any solid trial evidence to back it up




‘The present review concludes that dietary advice not merely needs review; it should not have been introduced.’


However, many public health and nutrition scientists criticised the conclusions of the review in the online BMJ journal Open Heart, saying wider evidence at the time and since has justified the advice and heart deaths have fallen dramatically.


The researchers carried out a review of data from trials that would have been available to UK and US regulators at the time. These trials were regarded as the ‘gold standard’ of medical testing.


Six relevant trials were found, spanning an average of five years, and involving 2,467 men – most of whom had survived a heart attack or similar event.


The trials looked at the relationship between dietary fat, cholesterol, and coronary heart disease. The review found no difference in heart deaths, regardless of whether people were on a high fat or lower fat diet.

Professor Iain Broom, of the Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, said there was now mounting evidence against the introduction of low-fat diets to combat heart disease.

 

[superbeets]

Yet governments in both the US and UK have ‘practically destroyed the dairy industry by suggesting that butter, cheese and full fat milk increased cardiovascular disease risk, when the contrary is true,’ he said.
Professor Broom also said advice to increase carbohydrate consumption to 50 per cent of energy intake was blamed by some experts for an epidemic of obesity and type 2 diabetes.


He said: ‘It is now time for the UK Government to grasp the nettle and stop an uncontrolled experiment, which has gone global and may have had bad outcomes in terms of the obesity explosion and creating a more unhealthy nation with the current idea of “healthy eating”.



The review was led by Zoe Harcombe, Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, and Dr James DiNicolantonio, Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City.


In 1983, the country was told to reduce its overall fat consumption to 30 per cent. Official guidelines were changed in 1991 raising this to 35 per cent, but saturated fats remained at 10 per cent.


This advice has remained unchanged even though new studies have continued to suggest that there is no association between heart disease and those fats. Britain’s saturated fat consumption is currently around 12 per cent.


Last year a US research scientist called for a campaign telling people they had been taken down the ‘wrong dietary road for decades’ in avoiding saturated fat while not being warned about eating too much carbohydrate and sugar.


It is not the first time experts have blamed faulty interpretation of studies for creating a ‘myth’ around the role played by saturated fat in heart disease. Researchers last year conducted a ‘meta-analysis’ of data from 72 studies involving more than 600,000 participants from 18 countries.


It is a statistically powerful technique to reveal trends that may be masked in individual small studies, but which become obvious when they are amalgamated.
A key finding was that total saturated fat, whether measured in the diet or the bloodstream, showed no association with heart disease.
But cardiologist Dr Rahul Bahl, of the Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, also writing in Open Heart, said: ‘There is certainly a strong argument that an over-reliance in public health on saturated fat as the main dietary villain for cardiovascular disease has distracted from the risks posed by other nutrients, such as carbohydrates.


‘Yet replacing one caricature with another does not feel like a solution.’


Professor Tom Sanders, of King’s College London, said in the 1970-80s the UK and other Western countries were facing an epidemic of coronary heart disease.


He said: ‘It was effectively a policy choice between sitting on the fence and doing nothing or opting to follow what the evidence suggested – that cutting total fat intake would help prevent obesity and reducing saturated fat would lower blood cholesterol. Anyway it seems to have turned out okay… between 1997 and 2007/8 cardiovascular disease mortality under the age of 75 years fell by 55 per cent.’

 

[superbeets]

[h=3]CARBOHYRATES ARE ALSO BECOMING A DIRTY WORD[/h]
Carbs are heading the same way as fat in becoming a dirty word, some experts say.


Reducing or even eliminating carbs is a key part of several weight-loss diet plans, while many experts are blaming foods such as sugar, bread, pasta and rice for the obesity epidemic.


But the NHS recommends eating plenty of potatoes, bread, rice and pasta with some milk and dairy foods, albeit low-fat options.

Reducing or even eliminating carbs is a key part of several weight-loss diet plans





By 1991 the official advice in the UK was actually to increase carbohydrates to provide 50 per cent of food energy.


This was partly to make up for the ‘energy gap’ caused by cutting the recommended amount of fat in the diet to 35 per cent.


But there has been growing disquiet with research suggesting eating more carbs, and sugar, has coincided with rising levels of obesity and type 2 diabetes.


In recent decades there has been a huge rise in consumption of refined carbohydrates such as white flour and sugars, white bread, sugary cereals, cakes and biscuits – the ‘hidden’ sugars and fats found in processed foods.
Refined carbs are digested quickly, leading to surges in blood sugar levels – a negative effect increasingly linked to health problems.


Two studies published in the Annals of Internal Medicine revealed that people looking to avoid obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes should abandon low-fat dieting strategies for a diet that is low in carbohydrates.


However many dieticians point out that a balanced diet is important, including fruit and vegetables, and demonising a food group could be counter-productive.


They say unrefined or wholegrain carbohydrates such as wholewheat bread, brown rice, wholegrain cereals, beans and legumes are healthy and protective against certain diseases.

 

[SheriffJoe]

This is why the answer is always markets, not mandates.

 

[Acebb]

"We said it for 41 years, but we were wrong""The science is settled."

LMFAO

 

[Acebb]

Yet governments in both the US and UK have ‘practically destroyed the dairy industry by suggesting that butter, cheese and full fat milk increased cardiovascular disease risk, when the contrary is true,’ he said.

:>(

How nice of those smart people making informed decisions.