Obviously Snoop and Will Farrel are paid recruiting agents.

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
Ha Ha. Gotcha.

So now we can clearly see that the reason why USC was hit with the 2nd worse penalty in the history of the NCAA infractions committee had little to do with anyone that was a part of the USC football program. It's almost inconceivable that the charges against USC were entirely trumped up, but it's true. The infractions committee under Miami AD Paul Dee spent 4 years looking for dirt and couldn't find any, so they made some up. There were members of the infractions committee and other individuals within the NCAA who actually collaborated to hurt the Trojans and one of their coaches just because they didn't like the image and the competition USC brought to the table and nothing more. Jealousy !
_________________________________________________________

Pac-12 Conference Commissioner Larry Scott on Monday criticized the NCAA’s investigation and punishment of USC -- this in the aftermath of the unsealing last month of almost 500 pages of documents in Todd McNair's lawsuit against the NCAA.

..................
150x150



"As we've maintained from the beginning, the USC case is a good example of how the current enforcement system is not fair and consistent across the board," Scott’s statement to the Los Angeles Times said.
USC and Pat Haden react to unsealed documents in Todd McNair case



"The punishments on USC were too harsh and after an initial review of the documents released recently, we share USC's serious concern regarding the process undergone by the NCAA and its Committee on Infractions, as well as the substance of their actions in the case."

A Pac-12 spokesman said that the conference has expressed its concern about the matter to the NCAA.



The documents that the NCAA unsuccessfully fought to seal included comments by members of the Committee on Infractions deriding USC’s response to the scandal and an excerpt of an email by the committee’s director, Shep Cooper, that called McNair a “lying, morally bankrupt criminal.”McNair, a former running backs coach at USC, sued the NCAA for defamation in June 2011 after being sanctioned in connection with the Reggie Bush extra-benefits scandal. USC had been sanctioned in June 2010 for "lack of institutional control" for violations that centered on former football star Bush and his family, and former basketball star O.J. Mayo.

After the documents filed in California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal became public last month, USC said in a statement that they confirmed “bias against McNair and USC by and on behalf of the NCAA and its Committee on Infractions.”


The NCAA countered by saying that the documents showed “how the Committee on Infractions underwent thorough deliberations consistent with the policies and procedures governing the infractions process.”


The documents omitted about 200 pages of emails, deposition transcriptions and other documents that the NCAA had conditionally filed under seal. Attorneys for McNair filed a motion last month to dismiss the NCAA’s appeal in the case because of the missing documents.

The NCAA hasn’t responded to the motion.
__________________________________________________________

That's just the latest revelation that shows what really makes the NCAA tick. However there is much more to tell and as far as I am concerned, the current and past NCAA leadership are a bunch of cowards. Consider that they gave PSU a pass after just 2 years of sanctions when the school filed its appeal but USC who's violations are a parking ticket by comparison paid 3 times more than Penn State. Hypocrites ! It's time that the NCAA fired every member who participated in the smear of USC's reputation and its championship history. Every individual involved in the smear should be permanently banned from college football

Unfortunately, much of the evidence against the NCAA will never be tested on a witness stand in a court of law. I figure that by the time Todd McNair's defamation lawsuit against the NCAA is settled, it will cost the NCAA an 8 figure paycheck for what they did to him. As far as the school and the Heisman committee go, reparations for NCAA wrongdoing remain to be seen. Anything less than total transparency and full disclosure by the present NCAA leadership is an act of cowardice.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
13,268
Tokens
OR maybe it was because...

1. Their AD basically said "come at me, bro" to the NCAA.
2. They had ONE TOTAL PERSON IN THEIR COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT.
3. Their athletic department had MULTIPLE violations in MULTIPLE sports... that were overseen by this singular compliance person. They weren't even trying. That is the definition of "failure to monitor" and "lack of institutional control."
4. Hiring Lane Kiffin... a guy that EVERYONE KNOWS IS CHEATING, DIRTY SCUM... is 100% relevant to how hard you're trying to clean up your program. USC never took things seriously, and they always thumbed their noses at the NCAA thinking that the NCAA would balk.
5. The entire system depends on self-reporting and monitoring by member institutions. When you don't do that or lie it's much bigger than the actual crimes. The NCAA thought (rightfully) that everyone associated with USC athletics was lying.
6. There was irrefutable proof that they were using ineligible players, and the fact that they made no attempt to uncover that they were ineligible matters.


 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
OR maybe it was because...

1. Their AD basically said "come at me, bro" to the NCAA.
2. They had ONE TOTAL PERSON IN THEIR COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT.
3. Their athletic department had MULTIPLE violations in MULTIPLE sports... that were overseen by this singular compliance person. They weren't even trying. That is the definition of "failure to monitor" and "lack of institutional control."
4. Hiring Lane Kiffin... a guy that EVERYONE KNOWS IS CHEATING, DIRTY SCUM... is 100% relevant to how hard you're trying to clean up your program. USC never took things seriously, and they always thumbed their noses at the NCAA thinking that the NCAA would balk.
5. The entire system depends on self-reporting and monitoring by member institutions. When you don't do that or lie it's much bigger than the actual crimes. The NCAA thought (rightfully) that everyone associated with USC athletics was lying.
6. There was irrefutable proof that they were using ineligible players, and the fact that they made no attempt to uncover that they were ineligible matters.
That sounds like a crock because you have used nothing but broad generalities. A simple formula for lying. If you named off any specifics aside from shit like "everybody knows" some of what you said would at least SOUND believable.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
13,268
Tokens
That sounds like a crock because you have used nothing but broad generalities. A simple formula for lying. If you named off any specifics aside from shit like "everybody knows" some of what you said would at least SOUND believable.


No they are all facts.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
13,268
Tokens
Links to what? It's all pretty clear.

Name 1 of the above listed points that is not correct.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
Prove that they are. You posted it, not me. Everything I posted is in the record, court transcripts, etc.
If I can back up what I say with credible articles and quotes (as posted,) you can do the same. I really
hope you are not as loose with so called facts as you have shown yourself to be in your statements.

Just back it up.
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
OR maybe it was because...

1. Their AD basically said "come at me, bro" to the NCAA.
2. They had ONE TOTAL PERSON IN THEIR COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT.
3. Their athletic department had MULTIPLE violations in MULTIPLE sports... that were overseen by this singular compliance person. They weren't even trying. That is the definition of "failure to monitor" and "lack of institutional control."
4. Hiring Lane Kiffin... a guy that EVERYONE KNOWS IS CHEATING, DIRTY SCUM... is 100% relevant to how hard you're trying to clean up your program. USC never took things seriously, and they always thumbed their noses at the NCAA thinking that the NCAA would balk.
5. The entire system depends on self-reporting and monitoring by member institutions. When you don't do that or lie it's much bigger than the actual crimes. The NCAA thought (rightfully) that everyone associated with USC athletics was lying.
6. There was irrefutable proof that they were using ineligible players, and the fact that they made no attempt to uncover that they were ineligible matters.


Or maybe it was because your sack of crap team had lost 7 games in a row to USC and had to find a way to try and win a game, so they sent their stooge in to get USC. You are a disgrace to all Notre Dame fans. Your team got the caca kicked out of them by Alabama in the NC game and you have no idea how to react.
 

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,538
Tokens
By the way, Nutered Dame went 3-2 against USC in the 5 years that USC was on probation. Totally pathetic. I have been to many USC-Notre Dame games both in Los Angeles and South Bend. I have made many friends who are Irish Alumni. You sir, are a disgrace to those people. We realize what this rivalry means, but we wish no harm to the other team. You are a complete (expletive deleted) who hates everyone and every team in here except Notre Dame. You go out of your way to pick fights with Pac 12 fans, SEC fans, and just about fan who does not like the Irish. You really should be banned because you offer nothing good to this site. Your knowledge of College Football is terrible.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
Speaking of Notre Dame...
Actually they only lost 6 games to USC because one of the seven consecutive wins** by the Trojans was vacated by the NCAA. But it can't get any shadier than the way the infractions committee did the dirty deed.

**Unfortunately for Notre Dame, the committee could do nothing to vacate Oregon State's 2 wins over the Irish since the 2000 Fiesta Bowl.

Melissa L. Conboy, Notre Dame – Senior deputy athletics director who sat on USC's infraction committee represented a school that was a traditional opponent of USC. According to NCAA bylaws, she should have disqualified herself, but did she? Anyone here venture to guess how she voted in USC's case before the investigations committee? I think she just mailed it in.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
13,268
Tokens
By the way, Nutered Dame went 3-2 against USC in the 5 years that USC was on probation. Totally pathetic. I have been to many USC-Notre Dame games both in Los Angeles and South Bend. I have made many friends who are Irish Alumni. You sir, are a disgrace to those people. We realize what this rivalry means, but we wish no harm to the other team. You are a complete (expletive deleted) who hates everyone and every team in here except Notre Dame. You go out of your way to pick fights with Pac 12 fans, SEC fans, and just about fan who does not like the Irish. You really should be banned because you offer nothing good to this site. Your knowledge of College Football is terrible.


Funny stuff....nutered Dame. Never heard that one before. You have no idea son. I love all college football and have more knowledge about it than you without question. Sorry you are blinded by your hate of ND but you know NOTHING about me and what teams i like by your clueless worthless statement.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
13,268
Tokens
Prove that they are. You posted it, not me. Everything I posted is in the record, court transcripts, etc.
If I can back up what I say with credible articles and quotes (as posted,) you can do the same. I really
hope you are not as loose with so called facts as you have shown yourself to be in your statements.

Just back it up.

I posted it as fact, prove ME wrong.

USC is a great school and in my top 20 favs, just wish they could do it without cheating
and maybe a real degree for more athletes.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,917
Messages
13,575,193
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com