Obama shaking hands with Chavez??

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
121
Tokens
What is with this guy?? I can not believe he is shaking hands with Chavez and accepts a book as a gift from the guy. Then he shakes the hand of Ortega?? This guy is a trainwreck! First he bows to the Saudis and now he is shaking hands with these communist scum?!!??! He makes GW look like the 2nd coming of JFK now!! Please tell me the libertarian party will gain strength from this debacle!
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
Yeah, it would be terrible if somehow Obama could make an enemy a friend, or at the very least much less hostile toward us.

I guess some people are happier when they have a lot of boogeymen to point their finger and shriek at.

I'm going to do a search to see if you started a similar thread when GWB shook Chavez's hand. I'm pretty sure I won't find anything.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
Personally, I think this is a good thing. USA needs to stop being mean to the other Countries and help them more. Although I am Republican, Obama rocks in my opinion. He just simple got that jack going on. He is a very special and significant player in the world. He is Godlike !


:cripwalk::cripwalk::cripwalk::cripwalk:
 

the hardest way to make an easy living
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
1,513
Tokens
Our previous president HOLDS FUCKING HANDS WITH PRINCE BANDAR, skipping through the White House rose garden and carving "Dubs Luvs Prince" into a tree... and the neocons are up in arms over an exchange at the Summit of Americas. HA! :):):):)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
1,916
Tokens
And so we see the face of diplomacy finally melded with the face of America. Chavez has his issues as do all men in power, but who are we to challenge the sovereignty of Venezuela?

I think that this is just another example that the world didn't take issue with the US as a whole, but more so with the personality of Bush, the failed president.

It's been a long time coming, but it took the U.S.A 8 years to realize what the rest of the world knew. Thank God we have a man of intelligence and character in the White House, change has come to America.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,998
Tokens
Our previous president HOLDS FUCKING HANDS WITH PRINCE BANDAR, skipping through the White House rose garden and carving "Dubs Luvs Prince" into a tree... and the neocons are up in arms over an exchange at the Summit of Americas. HA! :):):):)

Yet another leftist throwing out the "neocon" slur not even knowing
what it means, and hoping it sticks.

:laugh:
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
5,533
Tokens
This Man is a Disgrace - Loren78

images
= Jesuit Stooge

esp_vatican_pope_chavez_sff_ful.jpg
= Opposame


 

New member
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
121
Tokens
And so we see the face of diplomacy finally melded with the face of America. Chavez has his issues as do all men in power, but who are we to challenge the sovereignty of Venezuela?

I think that this is just another example that the world didn't take issue with the US as a whole, but more so with the personality of Bush, the failed president.

It's been a long time coming, but it took the U.S.A 8 years to realize what the rest of the world knew. Thank God we have a man of intelligence and character in the White House, change has come to America.

Saying that Chavez has issues with being in power is like saying Hitler kind of had a problem with the Jews. Chavez is basically taken over that whole country by siezing private assets and making them government owned. He has basically shut off any news outlet that is not government owned.
That is my point to this whole thread. GW was a disaster when it came to meeting with foreign leaders and i thought Obama was supposed to be a man of change. Only change i see is that the person in charge has a (D) next to his name as opposed to an (R). What Bush did at the white house with the saudi's was a complete joke, but you are telling me what Obama did was any better? That is my point, nothing is changing. Everything is the same. As far as Chavez goes, I think the guy is the scum of the earth and constantly wants to challenge the US. Whether it is allying himself with Iran or North Korea, allowing the Russians to partake in Naval war games in this hemisphere, or wanting to wage war with Colombia. We have a right to challenge any sovereign nation if they threaten our nation, way of life, or our allies.
As far as intelligence and character goes, I hope you are right. I hope that Obama is the 2nd coming of JFK, the dow returns to 14k, the world loves us again, the USA wont be attacked by terrorists, and we all can hold hands and sing Kumbaya together. I am skepitcal though since it seems whenever he is away from the teleprompter it is a disaster.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
3,180
Tokens
Personally, I think this is a good thing. USA needs to stop being mean to the other Countries and help them more. Although I am Republican, Obama rocks in my opinion. He just simple got that jack going on. He is a very special and significant player in the world. He is Godlike !


:cripwalk::cripwalk::cripwalk::cripwalk:
agree 100%, cold. bush was my way or the highway, and that seldom works in this political world. we created way too much hate for us the way we treated other countries.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
What pissed me off during the Bush era was some people saying "who cares what other countrys think?" F - that. If you are going to be a good leader, you need to do what it takes to get people to follow.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
505
Tokens
What pissed me off during the Bush era was some people saying "who cares what other countrys think?" F - that. If you are going to be a good leader, you need to do what it takes to get people to follow.
we're very fortunate our founding fathers did not share this viewpoint. as the most powerful nation on this planet, you don't give a f*** what others think about you. BO's naivety is off the charts
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
we're very fortunate our founding fathers did not share this viewpoint. as the most powerful nation on this planet, you don't give a f*** what others think about you. BO's naivety is off the charts

They didn't offer any history courses in Willow?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
505
Tokens
They didn't offer any history courses in Willow?
lol i've actually taken a few courses. please enlighten me on a situation where one of our founding fathers bowed to a king or shook the hand and laughed with a murdering tyrant. thanks
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
All successful leaders throughout history have been good statesmen.

Being a bully is dangerous, expensive and counterproductive in most cases.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Quote:
Originally Posted by punter 
They didn't offer any history courses in Willow?


lol i've actually taken a few courses. please enlighten me on a situation where one of our founding fathers bowed to a king or shook the hand and laughed with a murdering tyrant. thanks



All successful leaders throughout history have been good statesmen.

Being a bully is dangerous, expensive and counterproductive in most cases.

Good answer :monsters-
 

the hardest way to make an easy living
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
1,513
Tokens
Yet another leftist throwing out the "neocon" slur not even knowing
what it means, and hoping it sticks.

"Neoconservatism is a political philosophy that emerged in the United States. It supports using U.S. power, including military force, to bring democracy and human rights to other countries, seeing this as virtuous or even morally obligatory.... they are willing to interfere for overriding social purposes"

tough one for you to comprehend, isn't it festeringZit?

"Dubs Luvs Prince" :):)
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,998
Tokens
"Neoconservatism is a political philosophy that emerged in the United States. It supports using U.S. power, including military force, to bring democracy and human rights to other countries, seeing this as virtuous or even morally obligatory.... they are willing to interfere for overriding social purposes"

tough one for you to comprehend, isn't it festeringZit?

"Dubs Luvs Prince" :):)

Foreign military interventionism is but one small aspect of one definition of
neo-conservatism. The fact is that most conservatives are not neo-cons,
and most of the time that donkeys use the term on here, they use it
as a derisive slur - not even knowing what the term means.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Foreign military interventionism is but one small aspect of one definition of
neo-conservatism. The fact is that most conservatives are not neo-cons,
and most of the time that donkeys use the term on here, they use it
as a derisive slur - not even knowing what the term means.

Damn you smart boy. You know more than the dictionary.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,573,002
Members
100,865
Latest member
dinnnadna
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com