Obama " Honduras coup not legal"

Search

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
says who? I'm guessing the people who took power in that country will write their own laws.

Can anyone define a "legal coup"? just wondering

For example, was Castro's coup legal?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

no stripes on my shirt but i can make her pu**y wh
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
4,571
Tokens
haha
that could be dumber than anything that came out of GW's mouth
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,892
Tokens
Calling this a "coup" is typical left wing bullshit in the first place.

Obama stands with Castro, Chavez and Ortega
POWERLINE
By Scott

In condemning the removal of Honduran President Mel Zelayaya by the Honduran military, Pesident Obama stands shoulder to shoulder with the Fidel Castro and his thug epigones Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega. Zelaya sought to conduct an illegal referendum to extend his rule. The Honduran military has sought to enforce the rule of law by providing for Zelaya's departure from the scene. Mary Anastasia Grady explains:

>>>Yesterday the Central American country was being pressured to restore the authoritarian Mr. Zelaya by the likes of Fidel Castro, Daniel Ortega, Hillary Clinton and, of course, Hugo himself. The Organization of American States, having ignored Mr. Zelaya's abuses, also wants him back in power. It will be a miracle if Honduran patriots can hold their ground.

That Mr. Zelaya acted as if he were above the law, there is no doubt. While Honduran law allows for a constitutional rewrite, the power to open that door does not lie with the president. A constituent assembly can only be called through a national referendum approved by its Congress.

But Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had Mr. Chávez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela. The Supreme Court ruled his referendum unconstitutional, and it instructed the military not to carry out the logistics of the vote as it normally would do.

The top military commander, Gen. Romeo Vásquez Velásquez, told the president that he would have to comply. Mr. Zelaya promptly fired him. The Supreme Court ordered him reinstated. Mr. Zelaya refused.

Calculating that some critical mass of Hondurans would take his side, the president decided he would run the referendum himself. So on Thursday he led a mob that broke into the military installation where the ballots from Venezuela were being stored and then had his supporters distribute them in defiance of the Supreme Court's order.

The attorney general had already made clear that the referendum was illegal, and he further announced that he would prosecute anyone involved in carrying it out. Yesterday, Mr. Zelaya was arrested by the military and is now in exile in Costa Rica.

It remains to be seen what Mr. Zelaya's next move will be. It's not surprising that chavistas throughout the region are claiming that he was victim of a military coup. They want to hide the fact that the military was acting on a court order to defend the rule of law and the constitution, and that the Congress asserted itself for that purpose, too.

Mrs. Clinton has piled on as well. Yesterday she accused Honduras of violating "the precepts of the Interamerican Democratic Charter" and said it "should be condemned by all." Fidel Castro did just that. Mr. Chávez pledged to overthrow the new government.

Honduras is fighting back by strictly following the constitution. The Honduran Congress met in emergency session yesterday and designated its president as the interim executive as stipulated in Honduran law. It also said that presidential elections set for November will go forward. The Supreme Court later said that the military acted on its orders. It also said that when Mr. Zelaya realized that he was going to be prosecuted for his illegal behavior, he agreed to an offer to resign in exchange for safe passage out of the country. Mr. Zelaya denies it.

Many Hondurans are going to be celebrating Mr. Zelaya's foreign excursion. Street protests against his heavy-handed tactics had already begun last week. On Friday a large number of military reservists took their turn. "We won't go backwards," one sign said. "We want to live in peace, freedom and development."

Besides opposition from the Congress, the Supreme Court, the electoral tribunal and the attorney general, the president had also become persona non grata with the Catholic Church and numerous evangelical church leaders. On Thursday evening his own party in Congress sponsored a resolution to investigate whether he is mentally unfit to remain in office.

By contrast with his dithering on Iran, President Obama has immediately sorted out the rights and wrongs of the situation. Unfortunately, he sorted them out and cast his lot with Zelaya. Obama is "deeply concerned" about the ouster of a tyrannical president exceeding the bounds of his lawful authority:

"I am deeply concerned by reports coming out of Honduras regarding the detention and expulsion of President Mel Zelaya. As the Organization of American States did on Friday, I call on all political and social actors in Honduras to respect democratic norms, the rule of law and the tenets of the Inter-American Democratic Charter. Any existing tensions and disputes must be resolved peacefully through dialogue free from any outside interference."<<<

Here, however, the military has sought to preserve the rule of law against the president's lawless efforts to extend his rule. Why is Obama standing with Castro, Chavez and Ortega to support Zelaya? The company he's keeping should give Obama a clue, but one begins to wonder if he likes it.

UPDATE: Reader Tony Rodolakis, who wrote us about this story yesterday, writes again today to make an important point: "The military's decision to install Roberto Micheletti, leader of the Congress and constitutional successor to the president, as temporary president gives further evidence of its intent to support to defend the rule of law and the constitution, not simpy make a grab for power."
 

Officially Punching out Nov 25th
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,482
Tokens
Add 2009 in Honduras...:103631605

You were shocked and apaulled that this happend on Sunday, do you even know what the fuck you are talking about before you start typing.

Cracker muther fucker
 

Officially Punching out Nov 25th
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,482
Tokens
HAHAHA Whirlpool Willy thats Gold!!!
WHIRLPOOL%20AWM8000.jpeg


Spin baby Spin
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,892
Tokens
You were shocked and apaulled that this happend on Sunday, do you even know what the fuck you are talking about before you start typing.

Cracker muther fucker

LOL...thatta boy...racist comments and random drivel really help your argument.

Who knows what the hell you mean ..."apauulled" ? !~~~!
 

Officially Punching out Nov 25th
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,482
Tokens
LOL...thatta boy...racist comments and random drivel really help your argument.

Who knows what the hell you mean ..."apulled" ? !~~~!

Who'd arguing I'm just saying you were against the coup before you were for it. Sounds like Flip Flopping to me.

Cheese eating, shitty beer drinking Favre Felatiator
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
Willie fires up his pudgy fingered ergonomic keyboard, asks a snarky question.

Gets his usual handheld responses.

Gets an actual response (obv. not expecting one).

MJ goes into spin mode.

And the wheels on the bus go round and round.

Another thread by the Whirlpool Willy.

"an actual response" LOL

OK, you named a country, that really doesn't mean too much, does it?

Tell us the circumstances that make that coup legal as opposed to other coups, which are illegal.

or maybe you can simply DEFINE what a legal coup is. You see, you never did answer the question, now did you?

and I spin

brilliant :103631605
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
there must be some looney left playbook out there that only liberals can understand, because it don't make no sense, but they all agree it does, even when there's a great big disconnect.

How else can a mama obama evolve?

<><>
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,892
Tokens

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
does anyone think KTV defined a "legal coup"?

come on boys, don't be shy. Be proud of your logic

Define
1 a : to determine or identify the essential qualities or meaning of <whatever defines us as human> b : to discover and set forth the meaning of (as a word)



Q: define a "legal coup"
A: 2002 in the Phillipines.

Grade: Fail

too easy sometimes




692_sm.gif

KTV doing his thing
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
IDK KTV, I just don't think a change in powers based upon "accepted and legal" procedures is a coup. Using your argument and the circumstances you describe, you can call an election a "coup".

Maybe I can try to get you into the ballpark

-------------------------------------------------------------------

<dl><dd class="var">coup d'état (the term actually being referred to in this context) </dd><dd class="inf">
</dd><dt class="ety">Etymology:</dt><dd class="ety">French, literally, stroke of state</dd><dt class="date">Date:</dt><dd class="date">1646</dd></dl> : a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics ; especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group

---------------------------------------------------------------------

You see KTV, at the end of the day, it's not you that defines the meaning of a word, although I know libbies like to try and do this.

now show us your brilliance and comment about my client base or something, like you have a clue about that too.

:laugh:
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,892
Tokens
IDK KTV, I just don't think a change in powers based upon "accepted and legal" procedures is a coup. Using your argument and the circumstances you describe, you can call an election a "coup".

Maybe I can try to get you into the ballpark

-------------------------------------------------------------------

<dl><dd class="var">coup d'état (the term actually being referred to in this context) </dd><dd class="inf">
</dd><dt class="ety">Etymology:</dt><dd class="ety">French, literally, stroke of state</dd><dt class="date">Date:</dt><dd class="date">1646</dd></dl> : a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics ; especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group

---------------------------------------------------------------------

You see KTV, at the end of the day, it's not you that defines the meaning of a word, although I know libbies like to try and do this.

now show us your brilliance and comment about my client base or something, like you have a clue about that too.

:laugh:


Game, set, match. <><>

Nuff said. :toast:
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
As long as free elections take place as scheduled I see no problem. However military governments tend to want to hold power once they have it. We will see.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Press TV - Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:36:10 GMT

The newly installed Honduran President claims the military coup that brought him to power saved the country from the shackles of a Chavez-sponsored socialism.

Roberto Micheletti, who was installed as caretaker president hours after a military coup against the constitutional president, told Reuters on Monday that the ousted President Jose Manuel Zelaya was trying to follow a socialist model set by President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

"President Zelaya was moving the country toward 'Chavismo'," he said. "He (Zelaya) was following this model which is not accepted by Hondurans."

Micheletti pointedly used the Spanish term, 'Chavismo' in reference to the Chavez's socialist style of rule that won him substantial popularity in Venezuela and across Latin America.

Zelaya's forced removal was promptly condemned by Organization of American States (OAS), including the United States, whose president described the move as "illegal."

Venezuela, however, was more vocal in blasting the military coup d'etat, vowing to do whatever necessary to return President Manuel Zelaya to power.

The Venezuelan president vowed to overthrow Honduran Congress leader Micheletti should he be sworn in as president.

If Micheletti is telling the truth I can see why BO, Castro, Chavez and Ortega are upset.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
"The newly installed Honduran President claims the military coup that brought him to power saved the country from the shackles of a Chavez-sponsored socialism."

What's he supposed to say? I always wanted to be President and saw this as my best opportunity?
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
"The newly installed Honduran President claims the military coup that brought him to power saved the country from the shackles of a Chavez-sponsored socialism."

What's he supposed to say? I always wanted to be President and saw this as my best opportunity?

I’ll take from your post that you are skeptical of Micheletti much the same way I’m skeptical of BO.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,908
Messages
13,575,089
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com