OP 04-05-2020
Asmussen is 8% (8/101) last 30 days at Oaklawn. Diodoro is 23%, but 13% for last 2 weeks (4/31). Biggest difference is Diodoro routers have done better than his sprinters while Asmussen sprinters have done better than the routers.
McKnight has sucked all meet
8% (6/73). His best runners have been in Allowance races where 50% have hit the board.
Brad Cox numbers haven't changed much ... 23% for the month, 19% last 2 weeks. It is worth noting however, Joe Talamo rides most of his runners and hasn't won with last 11 favorites below 8-5 odds, and finished completely out of the money with 8 of the 11. That proves they are manipulating payoffs because they have won 30% with all runners over 8-5 (10/33), and in-the-money 60% (20-33). What I refer to as data evidence.
Just some stats for you to digest. Yummy.
race #1 - 8.5f
... toteboard should tell us the winner.
#5 5-2 OPERATIC - likely prepared by Savoy, not sure about intent because this is the first via Deville
#4 4-1 BELLA ALICITA
#7 6-1 CONFORMATION
race #2 - 6f
#6 6-1 PERFECT RUSH - 3yo working into shape ... dueled thru slop from post 1 in last.
#8 7-2 HEART RIVER - extremely logical!
#7 12-1 JUST FOR CASEY - nice works, inspect
#4 6-1 TRACI'S GREELEY
race #3 - 8.5f
#2 4-1 CANDY STORE
#4 7-2 LNGTERMRELATIONSHP
#7 5-2 PARADE FIELD
race #4 - 6f
#12 3-1 PRIVATE LAKE
#2 4-1 JAMES'S MOONSHINE
#4 9-2 RADICATOR
#9 20-1 BOO BE RIGHT - exotic booster
race #5 - 6f
... do we smell chalk dust? See if Cox/Talamo goes below 8-5.
#9 7-2 TRUE CASTLE
#10 4-1 ITALIAN JUSTICE
#1 9-2 SHE'S A DIME - O'Neill wheels-back?
#2 10-1 FLEETA BELLE - exotic booster
... rest to follow shortly ...
Asmussen is 8% (8/101) last 30 days at Oaklawn. Diodoro is 23%, but 13% for last 2 weeks (4/31). Biggest difference is Diodoro routers have done better than his sprinters while Asmussen sprinters have done better than the routers.
McKnight has sucked all meet
Brad Cox numbers haven't changed much ... 23% for the month, 19% last 2 weeks. It is worth noting however, Joe Talamo rides most of his runners and hasn't won with last 11 favorites below 8-5 odds, and finished completely out of the money with 8 of the 11. That proves they are manipulating payoffs because they have won 30% with all runners over 8-5 (10/33), and in-the-money 60% (20-33). What I refer to as data evidence.
Just some stats for you to digest. Yummy.
race #1 - 8.5f
... toteboard should tell us the winner.
#5 5-2 OPERATIC - likely prepared by Savoy, not sure about intent because this is the first via Deville
#4 4-1 BELLA ALICITA
#7 6-1 CONFORMATION
race #2 - 6f
#6 6-1 PERFECT RUSH - 3yo working into shape ... dueled thru slop from post 1 in last.
#8 7-2 HEART RIVER - extremely logical!
#7 12-1 JUST FOR CASEY - nice works, inspect
#4 6-1 TRACI'S GREELEY
race #3 - 8.5f
#2 4-1 CANDY STORE
#4 7-2 LNGTERMRELATIONSHP
#7 5-2 PARADE FIELD
race #4 - 6f
#12 3-1 PRIVATE LAKE
#2 4-1 JAMES'S MOONSHINE
#4 9-2 RADICATOR
#9 20-1 BOO BE RIGHT - exotic booster
race #5 - 6f
... do we smell chalk dust? See if Cox/Talamo goes below 8-5.
#9 7-2 TRUE CASTLE
#10 4-1 ITALIAN JUSTICE
#1 9-2 SHE'S A DIME - O'Neill wheels-back?
#2 10-1 FLEETA BELLE - exotic booster
... rest to follow shortly ...