No peeking, if the O/U on Rump lying under oath is 30.5 times, do you go over, or under?

[Dafinch]

Lawyers once did to Trump what the media won't: Make him admit his lies

By Laura Clawson
Wednesday Aug 10, 2016 · 9:56 AM PDT





Donald Trump is not new to this lying game. Trump has been Trumping for years, and a deposition Trump gave in one of his own lawsuits in 2007 shows how central a part of Trump’s persona and reputation his lies are. Trump had sued author Timothy O’Brien after O’Brien reported Trump’s wealth at significantly less than a billion dollars, never mind the multiple billions Trump claims. But it didn’t work out so well for Trump—the lawsuit was dismissed and O’Brien’s lawyers got him on the record with a series of whoppers. Thirty of them, in fact.

The lawyer played a clip from Larry King’s talk show, in which King asked Trump how many people worked for him. “Twenty-two thousand or so,” Trump said.
“Are all those people on your payroll?” Ceresney asked him.
“No, not directly,” Trump said. He said he was counting employees of other companies that acted as suppliers and subcontractors to his businesses.
​

That’s like saying your plumber is your employee. The government can arguably say that subcontractor jobs funded by government contracts count as government-created jobs, but Trump’s business is nowhere near big enough to make that claim—even if you believe he’s worth as much as he says he is. Not to mention, Trump’s is a particularly outrageous claim because many of those subcontractors have ended up suing Trump after he stiffed them on what he owed.
Trump’s list of lies included claiming to have been paid $1 million for a speech for which he was paid $400,000, not having borrowed from his father’s estate when he’d borrowed around $9 million, and having sold golf course memberships for $300,000 that he actually sold for $200,000.
In short, Trump lies like he breathes: loudly and constantly.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/trump-lies/

So, Rx readers, if you had under 30.5 lies by Rump, you're a winner!:missingte:money:cheersgif:chest:And they say HRC should be in jail...

 

[superbeets]

 

[Dafinch]

If he shredded her so much, Jagoff, why weren't there any charges brought by a Republican FBI director?

 

[LENBO]

Baaahaahaw, that should send the mental midget into Dr. Ben Carson thread like silence.

We were dead broke when we left the White House ....and on and on and on.

 

[vitterd]

Trey Gowdy has a permanent Hillary stamp across his head.

 

[Dafinch]

Trey Gowdy has a permanent Hillary stamp across his head.

Proceeded by the words, "I got bitch slapped by..."

 

[Willie99]

fucking idiots have the audacity to talk about lying

ointer:ointer:ointer:ointer:ointer:


it what's keeps the party for the losers. of the losers and by the losers in power

 

[vitterd]

Proceeded by the words, "I got bitch slapped by..."

Russ1945 was seen rocking back n forth with his Trey Gowdy action figure trying to comfort them both. Russ spent months telling us how Gowdy was gonna tear Hillary apart.....instead he got eaten up....just like Russ does here.

 

[LENBO]

fucking idiots have the audacity to talk about lying

ointer:ointer:ointer:ointer:ointer:


it what's keeps the party for the losers. of the losers and by the losers in power

A wise man once posted......
They just can't help it, it's in their DNA. w-thumbs!^

 

[The Guesser]

fucking idiots have the audacity to talk about lying

ointer:ointer:ointer:ointer:ointer:


it what's keeps the party for the losers. of the losers and by the losers in power

A Liar and a worthless loser. As the great Franco C pointed out. No wonder he's an Idiot Drumpf supporter.
He had my tax paperwork for a month and a half didn't even look at it.

I met with him on two occasions and he yeah yeah-ed me. He assured me he would get things done. He did nothing! My calls all went un-returned.

That is downright malpractice and if he was worth anything I would take legal action.

 

[vitterd]

A Liar and a worthless loser. As the great Franco C pointed out. No wonder he's an Idiot Drumpf supporter.
He had my tax paperwork for a month and a half didn't even look at it.

I met with him on two occasions and he yeah yeah-ed me. He assured me he would get things done. He did nothing! My calls all went un-returned.

That is downright malpractice and if he was worth anything I would take legal action.

Ahhhhhhh.....the great Franco C. He is the front runner for RX'er of the year.....without ever posting here.

 

[NFLTrends]

For the people in here calling out lies by either candidate....

IF you think one lies more than the other, please seek medical help.

On the other hand, it should be one in which their lies (or past lies) can hurt innocent people, or just blowing their own horn.

There are differences. But, both lie about as much as the other, it is just the context of the lie that should be the problem.

 

[The Guesser]

For the people in here calling out lies by either candidate....

IF you think one lies more than the other, please seek medical help.

On the other hand, it should be one in which their lies (or past lies) can hurt innocent people, or just blowing their own horn.

There are differences. But, both lie about as much as the other, it is just the context of the lie that should be the problem.

That's just not true. It's a false equivalency. Fact checkers have shown the Idiot Drumpf lies ALOT more than Hillary, and that's not easy to do.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ing-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-truth-o-met/
Comparing Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump on the Truth-O-Meter

Compare the Truth-O-Meter scorecards of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton

Democrat from New York

Clinton's statements by ruling

Click on the ruling to see all of Clinton's statements for that ruling.

• True
  53​
  (53)
• Mostly True
  67​
  (67)
• Half True
  51​
  ()
• Mostly False
  34​
  (34)
• False
  27​
  (27)
• Pants on Fire
  5​
  (5)

Donald Trump

Republican from New York

Trump's statements by ruling

Click on the ruling to see all of Trump's statements for that ruling.

• True
  9​
  (9)
• Mostly True
  24​
  (24)
• Half True
  32​
  ()
• Mostly False
  33​
  (33)
• False
  79​
  (79)
• Pants on Fire
  41​
  (41)

 

[NFLTrends]

That's just not true. It's a false equivalency. Fact checkers have shown the Idiot Drumpf lies ALOT more than Hillary, and that's not easy to do.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ing-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-truth-o-met/
Comparing Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump on the Truth-O-Meter

Compare the Truth-O-Meter scorecards of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton

Democrat from New York

Clinton's statements by ruling

Click on the ruling to see all of Clinton's statements for that ruling.

• True
  53​
  (53)
• Mostly True
  67​
  (67)
• Half True
  51​
  ()
• Mostly False
  34​
  (34)
• False
  27​
  (27)
• Pants on Fire
  5​
  (5)

Donald Trump

Republican from New York

Trump's statements by ruling

Click on the ruling to see all of Trump's statements for that ruling.

• True
  9​
  (9)
• Mostly True
  24​
  (24)
• Half True
  32​
  ()
• Mostly False
  33​
  (33)
• False
  79​
  (79)
• Pants on Fire
  41​
  (41)

Politifact is so biased it isnt even funny.

They give Hillary a "True" for something, even tho it doesnt have real actual fact behind it, just a small date sample size that gets close cause of estimates. Yet Trump says something that Hillary would TRUE for... he gets a MOSTLY FALSE, cause they wont use estimates??

MOSTLY FALSE for Trump = 50,000 job lost http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

TRUE for Clinton = Hillary Clinton says by 2009, U.S. drones had killed 'dozens' of senior terrorists http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...y-clinton-says-2009-us-drones-had-killed-doz/

Wait... so Trump gets a mostly false on a claim, cause politifact wont use estimates on job losses and precieved job losses... BUT Hillary gets a True, because the estimates say it would.

WTF!!>>!!>>>!>!>>??????

 

[The Guesser]

Politifact is so biased it isnt even funny.

They give Hillary a "True" for something, even tho it doesnt have real actual fact behind it, just a small date sample size that gets close cause of estimates. Yet Trump says something that Hillary would TRUE for... he gets a MOSTLY FALSE, cause they wont use estimates??

MOSTLY FALSE for Trump = 50,000 job lost http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

TRUE for Clinton = Hillary Clinton says by 2009, U.S. drones had killed 'dozens' of senior terrorists http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...y-clinton-says-2009-us-drones-had-killed-doz/

Wait... so Trump gets a mostly false on a claim, cause politifact wont use estimates on job losses and precieved job losses... BUT Hillary gets a True, because the estimates say it would.

WTF!!>>!!>>>!>!>>??????

No, they're not. I understand alot of guys on your side have to cling to the ridiculous "Fact checkers are biased claims", because facts don't favor your side. But if you can't acknowledge facts, there's not much to discuss. :think2:

 

[NFLTrends]

So why would they use estimates to give Clinton a true... yet wont use estimates for Trump, and give him a false?

 

[The Guesser]

So why would they use estimates to give Clinton a true... yet wont use estimates for Trump, and give him a false?

They didn't. There was enough reliable evidence to back Clinton's claim, and not enough to back Drumpf's. The evidence and analysis by Politifact in both instances was correct, IMO.

 

[NFLTrends]

They didn't. There was enough reliable evidence to back Clinton's claim, and not enough to back Drumpf's. The evidence and analysis by Politifact in both instances was correct, IMO.

Even tho professionsal estimated that between 35-40k in addictional jobs were lost and not made cause of that... yet they take professional estimates fro Clinton?

They ignore Trumps, yet search for Clintons lol

There is a reason I dont use ANY fact checking site... all are slanted and more of "Opinion" of what they think.

 

[Dafinch]

Even tho professionsal estimated that between 35-40k in addictional jobs were lost and not made cause of that... yet they take professional estimates fro Clinton?

They ignore Trumps, yet search for Clintons lol

There is a reason I dont use ANY fact checking site... all are slanted and more of "Opinion" of what they think.

Of all the idiots I mentioned in the "Foley is right behind Rump" thread, you're the dumbest of all. You ignore me-no, you have me on ignore-and yet, you, too, blunder into threads I start-like this one. And, let me guess, you're gonna buttonhole other posters about what I said. Fucking moron...

 

[The Guesser]

Even tho professionsal estimated that between 35-40k in addictional jobs were lost and not made cause of that... yet they take professional estimates fro Clinton?

They ignore Trumps, yet search for Clintons lol

There is a reason I dont use ANY fact checking site... all are slanted and more of "Opinion" of what they think.

No, they're not, but we're just going to disagree on this.:toast: I will rely on Fact Checking Sites over slanted. opinion media sites like Breitbart, Mother Jones, etc.