I've always wondered... why is it so hard for MANY people to even finish 60%?!?!?!
Last year, you got MAYBE 70 people who finished with at least 51 out of 85, which is exactly 60% but strangely that's only a whopping 5% of the 1404 entries?!?!?
So in a contest as big as this ONLY 5% of people got 60% or better? That # seems WAY LOW! Dont you agree?!
Seems that much more than 5% should finish with even 60% but that just isn't the case historically.... is handicapping sports (NFL) just this difficult, even when you have people PAYING $1500 for a huge ass contest like the SUPERCONTEST??? Then to finish in the elite Top 10 or top 0.7% you have to hit 65% of your plays (55.5/85)... is it really that hard to go from 60%-65% let alone 50/50 to 60%? Because any newbie can filp a coin to hit 50% of their plays, so even when you have THE BEST HANDICAPPERS IN THE WORLD 95% of them still fail to hit even 60% in a 17-week stretch of a contest they invested $1500 in? Help me understand people.... help me understand! :think2:
Last year, you got MAYBE 70 people who finished with at least 51 out of 85, which is exactly 60% but strangely that's only a whopping 5% of the 1404 entries?!?!?
So in a contest as big as this ONLY 5% of people got 60% or better? That # seems WAY LOW! Dont you agree?!
Seems that much more than 5% should finish with even 60% but that just isn't the case historically.... is handicapping sports (NFL) just this difficult, even when you have people PAYING $1500 for a huge ass contest like the SUPERCONTEST??? Then to finish in the elite Top 10 or top 0.7% you have to hit 65% of your plays (55.5/85)... is it really that hard to go from 60%-65% let alone 50/50 to 60%? Because any newbie can filp a coin to hit 50% of their plays, so even when you have THE BEST HANDICAPPERS IN THE WORLD 95% of them still fail to hit even 60% in a 17-week stretch of a contest they invested $1500 in? Help me understand people.... help me understand! :think2: