I Hope I Am Not Breaking Any In House Rules, But I Would Like To Share And Exellent P
<TABLE style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" borderColor=#000000 cellSpacing=0 borderColorDark=#f7ea0d cellPadding=26 width=767 bgColor=#000000 borderColorLight=#f7ea0d border=1><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=top bgColor=#000000>
Many people believe professional-level sports bettors win at least 60% of their bets. It's understandable that people think that, but it's just not true. The fact is, the difference between the percentage of bets won by successful sports bettors and the percentage of bets won by chronic losers is relatively very small.
We'll ignore money line bets here for the sake of clarity, and address only those bets wherein the player must risk 11 to win 10; - pointspreads and over/under bets. Against this type of bet, anyone at all can expect to win 50 percent. After all, the only thing required is to flip a coin and pick a side. The bookmakers' profit comes from the difference between what a bettor must risk and what a bettor expects to win. Every time a player wins, the bookmaker withholds slightly more than 9 percent of the winnings ($1 for every $11 risked). Consequently, a bettor winning only half his bets will ultimately go broke.
Professional sports bettors, by comparison, rarely sustain a long term winning percentage higher than 57 or 58 percent, and it's often as low as 54 or 55 percent. People find that hard to believe, and they understandably get even more skeptical when told that, for a genuine professional-level sports bettor, a long term winning expectation of 60% or more is actually too high.
That last paragraph sounds crazy at first, but as crazy as it may seem there is a simple explanation: If a bettor has five bets on a given day, risking $110 to win $100 on each bet, and wins three of them, that's a great winning ratio of 60% and a net profit for the day of 80 dollars. (The bettor wins $300 and loses 220 dollars.) If another bettor has fourteen bets on that same day, risking $110 to win $100 on each one, and wins eight of them, that's a much poorer winning percentage of only 57%, - but almost twice as much profit for the day of 140 dollars. (The bettor wins $800 and loses 660 dollars.)
The second bettor was not necessarily less skilled at picking winners than the first bettor; the second bettor may simply have chosen to apply all his advantages - including those which had less than a 60% chance of winning in the first place. If the ultimate goal is to make money, it is obvious which of those two bettors was more successful. The real goal is, of course, to make money. The measure of success of a sports handicapper is not his percentage of winning bets, but the relative amount of profit he made over any given period of time.
Although there are, indeed, propositions that offer more than a 60% expectation of winning, such propositions are relatively few and far between, and are only a very small part of the overall picture. With the break-even point at about 53%, genuine professional bettors know there is no tenable excuse to pass up propositions offering expectations of higher than, say, 55 percent. A small advantage applied over and over is awesomely effective. Mathematicians will confirm that a profit is more assured from a group of 200 bets with a 55% expectation-per-bet than from a group of 50 bets with a 60% expectation-per-bet. In other words, the more bets placed, the more predictable the outcome. (See our article, Binomial Distribution.)
To illustrate the point, consider casino craps. The house has less than a 51% winning expectation against a passline bet at craps, yet casinos advertise their craps games on signs 100 feet tall. Casino executives know that if they can get enough players to make enough bets they will end the day with approximately the percentage of profit expected. They also know that the fewer bets placed, the less predictable the percentage of winning bets. Can you imagine a casino wanting to limit the number of times you throw the dice?
<TABLE style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" borderColor=#000000 cellSpacing=0 borderColorDark=#f7ea0d cellPadding=26 width=767 bgColor=#000000 borderColorLight=#f7ea0d border=1><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD vAlign=top bgColor=#000000>
<B><BIG><BIG><BIG>Winning Percentages</BIG></BIG></BIG></B>
<BIG>Once And For All, - When Laying 11 To Win 10, What Percentage Of Bets Do Professional Gamblers Win? </BIG>
<SMALL><SMALL><SMALL>^v^v^v^</SMALL></SMALL></SMALL>
<B><BIG> </BIG></B>There's always an awkward pause when a non-gambler or a beginner asks me, "What percentage of bets do professional bettors win?"
It's a less-than-simple question to answer because it can't be answered simply. That, of course, sounds like a cop-out, but the answer to that question really does demand an explanation.
Many people believe professional-level sports bettors win at least 60% of their bets. It's understandable that people think that, but it's just not true. The fact is, the difference between the percentage of bets won by successful sports bettors and the percentage of bets won by chronic losers is relatively very small.
We'll ignore money line bets here for the sake of clarity, and address only those bets wherein the player must risk 11 to win 10; - pointspreads and over/under bets. Against this type of bet, anyone at all can expect to win 50 percent. After all, the only thing required is to flip a coin and pick a side. The bookmakers' profit comes from the difference between what a bettor must risk and what a bettor expects to win. Every time a player wins, the bookmaker withholds slightly more than 9 percent of the winnings ($1 for every $11 risked). Consequently, a bettor winning only half his bets will ultimately go broke.
Professional sports bettors, by comparison, rarely sustain a long term winning percentage higher than 57 or 58 percent, and it's often as low as 54 or 55 percent. People find that hard to believe, and they understandably get even more skeptical when told that, for a genuine professional-level sports bettor, a long term winning expectation of 60% or more is actually too high.
That last paragraph sounds crazy at first, but as crazy as it may seem there is a simple explanation: If a bettor has five bets on a given day, risking $110 to win $100 on each bet, and wins three of them, that's a great winning ratio of 60% and a net profit for the day of 80 dollars. (The bettor wins $300 and loses 220 dollars.) If another bettor has fourteen bets on that same day, risking $110 to win $100 on each one, and wins eight of them, that's a much poorer winning percentage of only 57%, - but almost twice as much profit for the day of 140 dollars. (The bettor wins $800 and loses 660 dollars.)
The second bettor was not necessarily less skilled at picking winners than the first bettor; the second bettor may simply have chosen to apply all his advantages - including those which had less than a 60% chance of winning in the first place. If the ultimate goal is to make money, it is obvious which of those two bettors was more successful. The real goal is, of course, to make money. The measure of success of a sports handicapper is not his percentage of winning bets, but the relative amount of profit he made over any given period of time.
Although there are, indeed, propositions that offer more than a 60% expectation of winning, such propositions are relatively few and far between, and are only a very small part of the overall picture. With the break-even point at about 53%, genuine professional bettors know there is no tenable excuse to pass up propositions offering expectations of higher than, say, 55 percent. A small advantage applied over and over is awesomely effective. Mathematicians will confirm that a profit is more assured from a group of 200 bets with a 55% expectation-per-bet than from a group of 50 bets with a 60% expectation-per-bet. In other words, the more bets placed, the more predictable the outcome. (See our article, Binomial Distribution.)
<CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=13 width=500 border=1><TBODY><TR><TD borderColor=#f7ea1a bgColor=#4e0000> "The measure of success of a sports handicapper is not his percentage of winning bets, but the relative amount of profit he made over any given period of time."</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
That, too, is one of the facts of life of which successful bettors must be familiar. It's a basic principle of math: The more bets you are able to place, the more likely it is that your winning percentage will be close to your expectations. A pro bettor must be more concerned with profit than with establishing a great winning percentage, and those two conditions are not always compatible. A real pro applies all his advantages as often as possible, not only the best of his advantages when they occasionally arise. To illustrate the point, consider casino craps. The house has less than a 51% winning expectation against a passline bet at craps, yet casinos advertise their craps games on signs 100 feet tall. Casino executives know that if they can get enough players to make enough bets they will end the day with approximately the percentage of profit expected. They also know that the fewer bets placed, the less predictable the percentage of winning bets. Can you imagine a casino wanting to limit the number of times you throw the dice?
The accompanying illustration (below) shows the results of different winning percentages over different numbers of bets when risking 11 to win ten. Standard vigorish charges of 4.55 percent are figured into the numbers. (The bookies' net commission is 4.55 percent of all monies risked when bettos risk 11 to win ten. See our article, A Crash Course in Vigorish.) Notice in the illustration that winning 55% of 250 bets is more profitable than winning 65% of only 50 bets, - and remember that a profit is more assured - that is, more dependable - because of the higher number of trials.
<CENTER><TABLE borderColor=#a90000 cellSpacing=0 borderColorDark=#a90000 cellPadding=5 width=356 align=center bgColor=#1a0000 borderColorLight=#a90000 border=1><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width=105 bgColor=#4e0000 rowSpan=2>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
<SMALL>percent of winning </SMALL>
<SMALL>bets</SMALL>
</TD><TD width=205 bgColor=#4e0000 colSpan=5><SMALL>bets</SMALL>
<SMALL>Total number of bets</SMALL>
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=48 bgColor=#4e0000>
50
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
100
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
150
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
200
</TD><TD width=41 bgColor=#4e0000>
250
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=105 bgColor=#4e0000>
65.0%:
</TD><TD width=48 bgColor=#4e0000>
13.3
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
26.5
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
39.7
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
53.0
</TD><TD width=41 bgColor=#4e0000>
66.2
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=105 bgColor=#4e0000>
62.5%:
</TD><TD width=48 bgColor=#4e0000>
10.6
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
21.2
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
31.9
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
42.5
</TD><TD width=41 bgColor=#4e0000>
53.1
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=105 bgColor=#4e0000>
60.0%:
</TD><TD width=48 bgColor=#4e0000>
8
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
16
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
24
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
32
</TD><TD width=41 bgColor=#4e0000>
40
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=105 bgColor=#4e0000>
57.5%:
</TD><TD width=48 bgColor=#4e0000>
5.4
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
10.7
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
16.1
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
21.5
</TD><TD width=41 bgColor=#4e0000>
26.9
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=105 bgColor=#4e0000>
55.0%:
</TD><TD width=48 bgColor=#4e0000>
2.7
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
5.5
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
8.2
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
11
</TD><TD width=41 bgColor=#4e0000>
13.7
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=105 bgColor=#4e0000>
52.5%:
</TD><TD width=48 bgColor=#4e0000>
0.1
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
0.2
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
0.4
</TD><TD width=28 bgColor=#4e0000>
0.5
</TD><TD width=41 bgColor=#4e0000>
0.6
</TD></TR><TR><TD width=105 bgColor=#4e0000> </TD><TD vAlign=top width=205 bgColor=#4e0000 colSpan=5>
<SMALL>Net number of units profit</SMALL>
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#4e0000 colSpan=6><SMALL>Graph shows effect of different win percentages over different numbers of bets. When risking 11 to win 10 it is best to use no more than 2% of your bankroll per bet - (Most pros use about 1 percent) - and 'pull the trigger' whenever you feel you have at least a 55% expectation of winning. Pro bettors tend to have a lot of bets compared to non-professionals. Note that winning 55% of 250 bets is actually more profitable than winning 65% of only 50 bets. More importantly, a bettor is more assured of achieving his expected win percentage over a larger total number of bets, and with more bets and smaller bet sizes, the 'ride' is much smoother, less risky, and more predictable.</SMALL> <SMALL>(Graph assumes all bets are same size.)</SMALL>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
Generally speaking, non-professional gamblers go wrong by risking too much of their bankroll on individual bets. They don't spread their risk thin enough over a big enough number of bets. Professionals use smaller bet sizes in proportion to their bankroll over larger numbers of bets. As a matter of fact, one good way to spot a non-pro is that he oten has fewer than a half-dozen bets per week, and he risks more than two percent of his bankroll on each bet. (Those sports touts peddling progressive betting schemes such as the "Kelly criterion" or "one-star, two-star, three star" systems aren't professional gamblers at all; they're salesmen selling dreams over their 900-numbers. Big swings in the size of your bets will send you back to your job at the car wash quicker than bad handicapping.) If you're a part-timer with a wad of 'mad' money to risk, it may be okay to risk 4 or 5 percent of your bankroll on a single bet, but don't expect to play that way for long. Sooner or later, such poor management will annihilate you. To quote from my book, How Professional Gamblers Beat The Pro Football Pointspread, the population of bad handicappers in Tap City is dwarfed by the population of bad money managers.
Of those genuine professional-level sports bettors I've known, most would never risk more than two percent of their working bankroll on any single bet, and all of them usually risk much less than that. The general consensus seems to be about one percent. - J. R. Miller
<SMALL><SMALL><SMALL>^v^v^v^</SMALL></SMALL></SMALL>
<SMALL>Click HERE for</SMALL> <SMALL>Home Page & Index</SMALL>
<SMALL><SMALL><SMALL>^v^v^v^</SMALL></SMALL></SMALL>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><SMALL>Click HERE for</SMALL> <SMALL>Home Page & Index</SMALL>
<SMALL><SMALL><SMALL>^v^v^v^</SMALL></SMALL></SMALL>
<CENTER><TABLE style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=767 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=763 colSpan=6></TD></TR><TR><TD align=middle width=166>
</TD><TD align=middle width=109>
</TD><TD align=middle width=120>
</TD><TD align=middle width=139>
</TD><TD align=middle width=91>
</TD><TD align=middle width=118>
</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=166><SMALL>How Professional Gamblers Beat the Pro Football Pointspread
- J. R. Miller
$34.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=109><SMALL>Pointspread Playbook
- Al O'Donnell
$19.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=120><SMALL>Insights Into Sports Betting
- Bob McCune
$29.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=139><SMALL>Roulette for the Weekend Gambler
- J. R. Miller
$9.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=91><SMALL>Sharp Sports Betting
- Stanford Wong
$19.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=118><SMALL>Revelations in Sports Betting
- Bob McCune
$29.95</SMALL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
</TD><TD align=middle width=109>
</TD><TD align=middle width=139>
</TD><TD align=middle width=91>
</TD><TD align=middle width=118>
</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=166><SMALL>How Professional Gamblers Beat the Pro Football Pointspread- J. R. Miller
$34.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=109><SMALL>Pointspread Playbook
- Al O'Donnell
$19.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=120><SMALL>Insights Into Sports Betting
- Bob McCune
$29.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=139><SMALL>Roulette for the Weekend Gambler
- J. R. Miller
$9.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=91><SMALL>Sharp Sports Betting
- Stanford Wong
$19.95</SMALL></TD><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=118><SMALL>Revelations in Sports Betting
- Bob McCune
$29.95</SMALL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
good read L...with respect to the bankroll issue i have always wondered what the real or true definition of bankroll is...i say this because most of us...myself included have had to add $$ at some point during the season...crap game...21 game or whatever...so the question begs...is the bankroll a determined or present account balance amount or is it a continuous flow of funds in which you are either positive or negative over the lifetime of wagers...thus the issue of a larger than 1 or 2 percent wager is only applicable to your actual $$ in the game at the time of wager...and not the 1 or 2 percent that you are capable of funding over a life time of wagers...yes you can lose more on higher % wagers of the present bankroll amount...but also you can win more as well...nobody and i mean nobody goes straight up...there are up days and down days..you just hope to keep the down days under control...the 51% to 57% win ratio is as applicable to the current bank roll as it is to the continuous bank roll imo...thus a continuous 1% bankroll wager requires a 51% win ratio or better to be in the positive whereas a rated system of 1, 2 ..5 units based upon strenght of play might be more important..i guess my point is either way is workable as long as you stick to one method over the lifetime...gl L
Great Reply Cheapseats!! And I Also Agree With U To Stick With It For Life.....as Far As Bankroll It Should Change Starting Unit Measure As The Year Goes.
Parlay Action!!
Indianapolis Colts -.5 -125/over The Total 10.5 -120 Lay 10**/23**
Indianapolis Colts -7.5 /under The Total 58 Lay 10**/26**
Good Luck!!!
Back Later.......
Parlay Action!!
Indianapolis Colts -.5 -125/over The Total 10.5 -120 Lay 10**/23**
Indianapolis Colts -7.5 /under The Total 58 Lay 10**/26**
Good Luck!!!
Back Later.......
