NBC's "Catch A Predator" Settles Lawsuit With Family for Man’s Suicide

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2001
Messages
1,932
Tokens
NBC Settles With Family That Blamed a TV Investigation for a Man’s Suicide

10255514_240X180.jpg

By BRIAN STELTER
Published: June 26, 2008

NBC has settled a lawsuit filed by the family of a man who killed himself when confronted with cameras for the documentary series “To Catch a Predator.”

The family of Louis W. Conradt Jr. filed a $105 million lawsuit last year against NBC, which ran the “Predator” episode as part of its “Dateline NBC” newsmagazine series. The network refused to disclose the amount it paid to the family.

“The matter has been amicably resolved to the satisfaction of both parties,” an NBC spokeswoman, Jenny Tartikoff, said in a statement.

The lawsuit spotlighted the techniques used by the hidden-camera program to attract men online by having someone pose as an under-age girl in a chat room, then luring them to a house where they were confronted by a camera crew and host. While “To Catch a Predator” drew high ratings for NBC, ethical questions were raised over the program’s all-access arrangements with the local police and an online watchdog group.

Mr. Conradt, an assistant district attorney in Rockwall County, Tex., had reportedly sent sexually explicit messages to a person he believed was under-age. It turned out that the person was a volunteer for Perverted Justice, an activist group that helps set up stings to catch child sexual predators. The group was a paid consultant for NBC in the “Predator” series.

The volunteer posing as a child arranged to meet with Mr. Conradt in November 2006, as part of a four-day sting in Texas facilitated by a local police department. The sting led to 25 arrests, but Mr. Conradt did not show up at the bait house, so the local police, encouraged by NBC (according to the lawsuit), decided to arrest him at his home. As the police and camera crews entered the home, Mr. Conradt shot himself in the head.

Last winter, when the ABC newsmagazine “20/20” investigated the “Predator” sting, Walter Weiss, a former detective with the police department that had worked with “Dateline,” said: “I understand he took his own life, but I have a feeling that he took his own life when he looked out the door and saw there was a bunch of television cameras outside.”

Mr. Conradt’s family agreed and filed a lawsuit. NBC maintained that the suit had no merit. In February a judge dismissed some of the lawsuit’s claims, but declared that a jury “could find that NBC crossed the line from responsible journalism to irresponsible and reckless intrusion into law enforcement.” The two parties reached a settlement before a trial could begin.

NBC would not comment on the details of the settlement, and would not say whether an apology to Mr. Conradt’s family would be issued. The Los Angeles Times, which first reported the resolution on Tuesday, said that the “Dateline” Web site had removed references to the Texas sting. The network would not comment on whether it had been removed as part of the settlement.

NBC has broadcast only two new “Predator” investigations in the last 12 months, and it appears the televised sex predator stings will not be repeated anytime soon. “Right now we are working on other investigative stories,” Ms. Tartikoff said in an e-mail message.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
I don't get it.

If he never went to the place how can they prove that he was the one sending messages?

Someone could have hack his account etc.
 

Rx .Junior
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
812
Tokens
I don't get it.

If he never went to the place how can they prove that he was the one sending messages?

Someone could have hack his account etc.

We really don't know what went on. He could have sent a pic, sent his phone number, etc to prove his identity.

Either way, I think that the judge is right in determining that a line was crossed between investigative journalism and other things. Not trying to defend child predators here, but NBC went WAY too far with this.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Sep 20, 2003
Messages
17,238
Tokens
Let's just hope that he set a precedent and other child molesters will follow his lead, and I don't mean by filing lawsuits either.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
We really don't know what went on. He could have sent a pic, sent his phone number, etc to prove his identity.

Either way, I think that the judge is right in determining that a line was crossed between investigative journalism and other things. Not trying to defend child predators here, but NBC went WAY too far with this.

Yea man... I am just wondering how they could go to someone house without hardcore eveidence?

Just seems like I could break into someones house use there computer and get them busted.
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
7,174
Tokens
i bet he sent explicit pics of himself, that was often the case in they're setups
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
i bet he sent explicit pics of himself, that was often the case in they're setups


BS evidence. Very easy to photoshop a picture and make it look very legit...

I really thought the only way to catch these dudes is have them show up at the place.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
how is that bs evidence? that's a serious offense

So If I cut and paste your head in Photoshop and put it on a naked dude’s body and send it to a little girl over chat you can get locked up?<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>

Just wondering how this all works...
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
7,174
Tokens
you can get charged, not me. you're the one transmitting pornographic material to a minor
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
you can get charged, not me. you're the one transmitting pornographic material to a minor

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
I don't think you understand what I am saying. I am pretending to be you over chat and send a photoshopped picture of you to a young girl.
<o:p></o:p>
You can use any BS info to get an email or chat account. I mean if I create a screen name or email and I can put whatever I want… <o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
Just wondering what kind of evidence they had b/c I thought the point of that show was to go into public chatrooms and pretend like they were young girls and get pedophiles to come to the place so they could bitch slap them... <o:p></o:p>
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
7,174
Tokens
what kind of evidence they had? they probably had hours of explicit dialogue and nasty pics of his junk. and before they head to his residence im sure they do they're due diligence in making sure the person on the other side of that chat is in that same residence. if not, no charges dropped and they'd turn around at the door. but i see the former happening more than the latter
 

MrJ

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
2,578
Tokens
and pretend like they were young girls and get pedophiles to come to the place so they could bitch slap them..

Yes, to get them for the intention of having sex with a minor. If the guy doesn't show up I don't see how there is an offense committed. We don't know the circumstances so it's silly to jump to conclusions about the guy's guilt.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
what kind of evidence they had? they probably had hours of explicit dialogue and nasty pics of his junk. and before they head to his residence im sure they do they're due diligence in making sure the person on the other side of that chat is in that same residence. if not, no charges dropped and they'd turn around at the door. but i see the former happening more than the latter

ahahaha... pic's of his junk. Fawk man I am sure there is more to this story.

I was just saying that if thats all it takes to have them bust your door down then a hacker could really fawk someone life up by posing as someone else...
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
Yes, to get them for the intention of having sex with a minor. If the guy doesn't show up I don't see how there is an offense committed. We don't know the circumstances so it's silly to jump to conclusions about the guy's guilt.


Yea. I thought they had to show up to get locked up... The should make the show better by allowing Chris H to shank anyone who walks through the door...
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
7,174
Tokens
they wouldnt bust, theyd knock, say they have a warrant, and maybe there are cases where they find out the guy did nothing wrong and they leave. but more cases than not, its the pedophile sittin there. i remember one time they tracked someone down outside a mcdonalds haha
 

We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
5,936
Tokens
I agree with Oldirty

No was is that evidence going to be held in court

They never saw him commit a crime
 

MrJ

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
2,578
Tokens
they wouldnt bust, theyd knock, say they have a warrant, and maybe there are cases where they find out the guy did nothing wrong and they leave. but more cases than not, its the pedophile sittin there. i remember one time they tracked someone down outside a mcdonalds haha

They're too wreckless; they make a mistake and they've ruined someone's life.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,916
Messages
13,575,164
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com