National Debt Tops $7 Trillion for first time ever

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,932
Tokens
By Jonathan Nicholson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government's national debt -- the accumulated debt from past budget shortfalls -- totaled more than $7 trillion for the first time as of Tuesday, according to a Treasury Department report.

In its daily financial statement released on Wednesday, the Treasury said the U.S. debt subject to a Congressionally set limit totaled $7.015 trillion, up from $6.983 trillion on Friday. The government was closed on Monday for the Presidents Day holiday.

While passing the $7 trillion mark itself has little practical significance, not unlike a car's odometer rolling over, it may signal some tough political times ahead for President Bush's administration on fiscal policy.

The government debt ceiling stands only a few hundred billion dollars ahead at $7.384 trillion, and Treasury would need Congress's blessing to borrow beyond that. Treasury officials say they expect the limit to be hit sometime between June and October.

And in this election year, Democrats may also use the $7 trillion figure to assail Bush's tax policy and the federal deficits on his watch. Budget shortfalls are met by borrowing. In 2003, the federal budget saw a record $374.25 billion gap and a larger one is expected this fiscal year.

The last time that debt subject to the limit passed a trillion-dollar milestone was on June 28, 2002, according to Treasury records. That was after Congress agreed to hike the debt cap at the time from $5.950 trillion to $6.400 trillion.

To give some idea of the size of the debt, U.S. g**** domestic product -- the sum of goods and services produced inside the United States -- totaled about $11 trillion at the end of 2003, according to the Commerce Department.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
Unless my math is fuzzy here, 6.983t to 7.015t is 32bil. They said that jumped from Friday to Wednesday, 5 days. If it jumped 32 bil every 5 days, it would annualize at 2.336 trillion, over 4X the estimated 500bil deficit. Are we in for a big surprise this year or is the debt increase not smoothly distributed?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,361
Tokens
So, we just print more money to pay it off.
icon_biggrin.gif
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,142
Tokens
worst 8 year economy ever, not one good year

thanks Obama
 

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
16,073
Tokens
While he was running for president, Obama criticized President Bush’s deficit spending, calling it “irresponsible” and “unpatriotic.” Obama said at a presidential campaign event on July 3, 2008:

The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents — 43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome. So we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.


Obama, with what will be nearly $8 trillion tacked on to the national debt, has added by far more to the U.S. debt than any president in history.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
Obama, with what will be nearly $8 trillion tacked on to the national debt, has added by far more to the U.S. debt than any president in history.

The rate is what is most important, not total amount. Bush doubling the debt from $5 trillion to $10 trillion represents the same exact failure as Obama doubling it from $10 to $20.

Obama's first term was almost as bad as Bush's second term (35% increase compared to 40%). But his second term has been among the slowest rates of growth in the debt in our lifetimes (very close to the 90s under Clinton). As much criticism as Obama deserves for the bailouts, stimulus packages, and war fighting during 2009-2012, he deserves as much credit for ending them and putting the countries budget back on track over the past four years.

It's interesting that Republicans typically start out doing well with the budget, then wreck it, while Democrats start out horribly, then seem to do ok by the end. I think the Republicans start out with the best of intentions, then get lazy and things fall apart; whereas Democrats start out with the worst of intentions, then get lazy and things do fine.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
The rate is what is most important, not total amount. Bush doubling the debt from $5 trillion to $10 trillion represents the same exact failure as Obama doubling it from $10 to $20.

Except for the fact that $20 trillion is not $10 trillion and the debt service on the $20 trillion is 1,000X more.

You probably should stop trying to defend the indefensible.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,142
Tokens
If I went eight years without a good year I would really hate the President too.

I didn't, but the country did

hence Democrats lost over 1,000 seats at federal and state levels, the biggest repudiation of policy in the history of our great nation
 

New member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
290
Tokens
Ya know, one of these days folks on the RX will realize that Congress holds the purse strings. You could just as easily blame a Republican controlled Congress for increased spending, but again, that doesn't fit the anti-Obama agenda.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Ya know, one of these days folks on the RX will realize that Congress holds the purse strings. You could just as easily blame a Republican controlled Congress for increased spending, but again, that doesn't fit the anti-Obama agenda.
You're absolutely right. Obama requested and Congress obliged.
It's note wise to make your boss unhappy. Especially when you
don't have a spine.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
290
Tokens
You're absolutely right. Obama requested and Congress obliged.
It's note wise to make your boss unhappy. Especially when you
don't have a spine.

If you think the head of the executive branch is the "boss" to members of the legislative branch, that's quite scary.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
If you think the head of the executive branch is the "boss" to members of the legislative branch, that's quite scary.
In theory they are both equal. In reality Obama owned the Congress. I guess you read the part about having a spine.
You must scare easily.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
290
Tokens
In theory they are both equal. In reality Obama owned the Congress. I guess you read the part about having a spine.
You must scare easily.

"In reality Obama owned Congress." In what way? The president and Congress haven't agreed to a budget resolution in years. They have consistently been at odds with one another. Congressional budget leaders such as Senator Enzi or Rep. Ryan haven't agreed much with one another or the executive branch over the past four years. Know your shit before you post bullshit.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
If you think the head of the executive branch is the "boss" to members of the legislative branch, that's quite scary.

They shut it down and were crucified. Politics just being politics, sounds great in theory but in reality it doesn't work when put into practice..

You should know better and hopefully just being partisan
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,858
Messages
13,574,195
Members
100,877
Latest member
businesstalkmag
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com