I had an issue that was of critical importance to me. Health Insurance. We have fallen through the cracks because of age and illness. Lets put that aside.
Am I not wrong with the following hypothesis. The ever growing evangelical right does not seem to be concerned with issues other than "moral values." We know what those are. I do not inherently disagree with most of them.
However as a group which is now dominated by the pre-tribulation rapture faction and knowing that Bush is seen in the eyes of most to have been placed in this office at this time by God, is not the prevailing thought in the church that the rapture is really almost upon us? Essentially therefore that would mean that Bush, in fact, is destined to carry forth the will of the Lord and as such his decisions, also in fact, will all be the correct ones in terms of inevitable destiny.
Therefore as long as he is perceived as "a man of God" nothing else matters. With the situation of Arafat and his likely choice of burial ground we then should expect to see the fight where the temple is destroyed and as such will then be rebuilt. All of prophecy will finally be fulfilled and bingo you guys and the President will hear the trumpet and will do one last flyover leaving the rest of us to cope with the anti-Christ and only 3.5 years before the torment really begins.
If I am correct in my speculation here then I can understand the re-election of George W. Bush. I have a problem with the casualties of war. You have a problem with abortion. But I don't want to muddle my question. I am just trying to rationally understand the Bush re-election.
Now one last thing. Each altar call at each revival or evangelical Christian church, sometimes three times a week, really means bye, bye Democrats for good. Even allowing for backsliders such as myself, if this is the main dynamic at play now; then we have passed the point of no return and we are no longer a democracy but rather a theocracy. We may as well have a one party system if the other party presents any issue that would spark moral indignation in the new evangelical Republican right party.
So really this is the end game. Wars, rumors of wars, famines, natural disasters, Gog and Magog and the armies from the East et all. Right or wrong?
Am I not wrong with the following hypothesis. The ever growing evangelical right does not seem to be concerned with issues other than "moral values." We know what those are. I do not inherently disagree with most of them.
However as a group which is now dominated by the pre-tribulation rapture faction and knowing that Bush is seen in the eyes of most to have been placed in this office at this time by God, is not the prevailing thought in the church that the rapture is really almost upon us? Essentially therefore that would mean that Bush, in fact, is destined to carry forth the will of the Lord and as such his decisions, also in fact, will all be the correct ones in terms of inevitable destiny.
Therefore as long as he is perceived as "a man of God" nothing else matters. With the situation of Arafat and his likely choice of burial ground we then should expect to see the fight where the temple is destroyed and as such will then be rebuilt. All of prophecy will finally be fulfilled and bingo you guys and the President will hear the trumpet and will do one last flyover leaving the rest of us to cope with the anti-Christ and only 3.5 years before the torment really begins.
If I am correct in my speculation here then I can understand the re-election of George W. Bush. I have a problem with the casualties of war. You have a problem with abortion. But I don't want to muddle my question. I am just trying to rationally understand the Bush re-election.
Now one last thing. Each altar call at each revival or evangelical Christian church, sometimes three times a week, really means bye, bye Democrats for good. Even allowing for backsliders such as myself, if this is the main dynamic at play now; then we have passed the point of no return and we are no longer a democracy but rather a theocracy. We may as well have a one party system if the other party presents any issue that would spark moral indignation in the new evangelical Republican right party.
So really this is the end game. Wars, rumors of wars, famines, natural disasters, Gog and Magog and the armies from the East et all. Right or wrong?
