Mr Schwarzenegger said they represented "an imminent risk to civil order".

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
icon_smile.gif


Whether they're imman towelheads or suave Christian control freaks in suits.

The ignorant religious fuk is alive and well in both societies.

Thank God Europe has moved out of the dark ages.
No wonder more and more young people reject religion.

Its almost comical, but you can't chuckle because its so sad and backward.

--------------------------------
Schwarzenegger fights gay unions


Gay couples are flocking to San Francisco
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has told his top legal official to act against the city of San Francisco for allowing gay marriages.
He ordered the state's attorney-general to take immediate steps to get a court ruling against the same-sex weddings.

Mr Schwarzenegger said they represented "an imminent risk to civil order".

More than 3,000 gay couples have been married in San Francisco since the city's new mayor decided to defy state law and allow such weddings.

On Friday, a judge denied a request by the conservative group, Campaign for California Families, for an injunction halting the same-sex marriages.

He said the group had failed to show convincing evidence that allowing gay weddings to continue would cause irreparable harm.

It was the second failed attempt to secure an injunction barring the unions.

'Rule of law'

Hours after Friday's court hearing, Mr Schwarzenegger wrote to the state's attorney general, Bill Lockyero.

We urge the governor to meet with some of the couples because what's happening is both lawful and loving

San Francisco mayor's spokesman
"Our civilised society and legal system is based upon a respect for and adherence to the rule of law," he wrote.

"The city and county of San Francisco's unfortunate choice to disregard state law and grant marriage certificates to gay couples directly undermines this fundamental guarantee.

"Because the city and county of San Francisco's actions are directly contrary to state law and present an imminent risk to civil order, I hereby direct you to take immediate steps to obtain a definitive judicial resolution of this controversy."

San Francisco's Mayor, Gavin Newsom, believes the state law requiring marriage to be the union of a man and a woman discriminates against gays and lesbians.


Gay couples hope more cities will follow San Francisco's lead
As well as issuing marriage licences, his officials are also suing the state in an attempt to the get the law overturned.

A spokesman for the mayor, reacting to Mr Schwarzenegger's directive, said: "The truth is, thousands of people are involved in loving relationships and having them recognised for the first time.

"We urge the governor to meet with some of the couples because what's happening is both lawful and loving."

Gay men and lesbians have travelled from ac**** the US to get married in San Francisco.

The BBC's David Willis in San Francisco says some regard what is happening in the city as a landmark moment in the struggle for gay rights and have likened it to the campaign against racial segregation in America.

Massachusetts case

Californians voted against gay and lesbian marriages under Proposition 22 in 2000, which says marriage is limited to one man and one woman.

Only the state of Vermont sanctions civil unions between same-sex couples, while Massachusetts, after a state High Court ruled that banning gay marriage was unconstitutional, is set to become the first state to approve same-sex marriage later this year.

On Friday, a county in the western state of New Mexico briefly issue marriage licences to dozens of gay couples.

"We were issuing licences today but we stopped because the state attorney-general issued a statement," Sandoval County clerk's office official Melinda Foster said.

New Mexico attorney-general Patricia Madrid declined to formally rule on the issue, but issued an advisory letter stating that "no county clerk should issue a marriage license to same-sex couples because those licenses would be invalid under current law".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3508969.stm


THE SKY IS FALLING!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!
icon_rolleyes.gif

THE EARTH IS FLAT!! THE EARTH IS FLAT!!
icon_rolleyes.gif
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,026
Tokens
Sanctioning deviant sexual behavior.

Is beastiality next?

Will my tax dollars be going to some dog for benefits soon?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
A civilised society treats people equally, and does not allow any minority to be persecuted, especially on dubious religious grounds.

Hey, you could use the Bible to persecute Jews as well as gays.
Some German dudes managed it 60 years ago, so its not too old fashioned or out of date as a concept.

You only need enough bigots, and it becomes policy.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
I can't wait for the first man, sheep wedding,whats to stop it? the definaition has completely been changed....fxckin anarchist.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
Pat,I'm up a real pretty sheep right now.Of course you will be invited to the wedding.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,431
Tokens
What if this judge in San Fran said "okay the law we will ignore this week is the one banning murder" would that be okay?
Also if 2 same sex people can get married then why can't a man marry 2 women. Or why can't I (a non homo) "marry" my non homo best friend? It isn't the governments business what I do in my bedroom so they should have no problem with that and just gimme the benefits that go along with it.
And for the record I have no belief in any god or any of that superstitious nonsense. I am just anti-stupidity.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Judge i never cared for sheep myself, I was always afraid they would blat on me.

What would guys like for a wedding present?
A good pair of rubber boots?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
"Our civilised society and legal system is based upon a respect for and adherence to the rule of law," [Schwarzenegger] wrote.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yet another politician unfamiliar with the meaning of one of the most basic concepts of political philosophy.

Someone please write the circus freak running California and explain to him that "rule of law" does not mean citizens are ruled by laws.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
Frankly, I dont care if a man and a sheep get married. Or a man and a man, a woman and a woman, or 5 women and a man. Why does the government get to decide who gets married. IF one thinks marriage is between a man and a woman, then make sure thats the way you get married.

This is another example of the so-called "small government party" putting thier noses in our citizens bedrooms. It is intrusive if you ask me.

Unconventional marriages are bizarre, but they wont hurt me in any way.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,883
Messages
13,574,674
Members
100,882
Latest member
topbettor24
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com