More evidence liberalism is a mental disorder..

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,742
Tokens
The liberal media and the leftist attacked President Bush non-stop for over 3 years and against all odds Bush wins fairly easy. Bush increased his % of votes in 46 states over the 2000 election.

Now all we hear is Bush needs to unite the country (code word for side with their agenda). Bush needs to reach out to the corupt world leaders, you people have lost your minds. Bushs ideas won and should be carried out. The election was a battle of ideas and America sided with the President. The left has no intention to unite and help the President carry out the will of the people, they are preparing to obstruct as I type. I say to them remember Tom Daschle.

The left is so confused and don't understand that the hate they directed towards Bush assisted his victory. We now hear the Bush backers are just stupid, white trash idiots. Wow, that's going to further your cause.

America rejected socialism, the big liberal media and the hollywood stooges.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,742
Tokens
Judge,

It's crazy sh!t, it has to be a mental disorder. How can this be explained, their ideas are rejected and they pop right back up into our face and want you to unite to thier radical plans. Take for instance the so-called healthcare crisis that Kerry talk about 24-7 the exit polls showed that 8% of the people thought there was a need for national healthcare. These people have lost it.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
Out,I apparently know very little about the climate in the US right now. I am apparently living in a time warp and probably better off that way.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
535
Tokens
Game haven't you heard....Rep's are uneducated robot sheep following Satin into the morass of hell. And some that we know actually believe in GOD (hahahaha what a funny concept that GOD is)........you would have thought they won the election.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
1,126
Tokens
Ah nothing like another flame thread from a false Christian who has sex out of wedlock, or at least spanks his monkey lusting about Britney Spears spread-eagled.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
If being Liberal means:

* to protest against an illegal war that has cost over 1000 American soldiers and 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians

* to protest against an illegal invasion that has cost the USA over 200 billion dollars

* to protest against an administration that employs a VP that is still employed on the payroll of a company that is awarded bid without bids in Iraq ...

COUNT ME IN AS AS A LIBERAL !
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Doc,
What GameFarce will not tell you is that no US imcumbent president has EVER lost during a time of war. Kerry, a "liberal" New England Democrat, received more vote than Ronald Reagan despite going up against those odds.

Do you guys REALLY think that stat-master Rove wasn't fully aware of that stat too? Iraq is not a mistake in the Bush plan -- it was a calculated political risk.

Now, I fully expect to hear the Christian extremists label me as "liberal" despite the fact that I was a moderate republican until Bush declared his unjust war. The real enemy is the big red machine that is split down the middle of America, as if the Mississippi were the a$$ crack of America. Some call it the "heartland" ... but really, it's more symbolically correct to perceive it as the butt hole of America.

Their "with us or against us" attittude and complete intollerence of other religions, beliefs, cultures and general opinions has forced America to become two completely seperate Americas.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,742
Tokens
Lander,

The 2 Americas are the red states which is approximately 85% of the US land mass, nationalist types. The blue states, the hollywood whacko types. You know as well as I do Americans reject liberalism. That's exactly why liberal dems that run for national office never admit to being liberals because they know it's the kiss of death.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
GuysL

Great pts .. coming & going

Am I like most folks? WORN OUT .....

The election is over .. its time to move on and the "Image" stigma is killing this country

It is time to move on before the opportunity to move on kills this country
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
The South and Midwest are too intolerant too elect a liberal, or any progressive for that matter. Change scares the begeebes out of them, so imagine what the non tax paying Churches threatening their souls would do. Spinkle a little anti-America fear-mong3ring reminiscent of Nazi Germany by Dick Cheney and you have a whole bunch of scared stupid people voting for a disaster.

I was pretty consistant in saying that I thought Bush would win. I had high, high hopes after the exit polls emerged, but hey -- who wouldn't have?

To summarize your deflection from my last factual post -- you are right, America will not elect a liberal.

Remember when I wanted Gephardt to win? Well, he certainly wasnt' my favorite -- labor unions do not help me one bit, but at least he had a chance of white trash America considering him.

Same story with Clark.

I did believe Edwards would have some sort of effect, but apparently I was grossly mistaken on his Southern "charm" being a factor.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,742
Tokens
Simply put...What is wrong with a little more personal responsibility and a little less government. We are at war with radical islam, it doesn't matter if we fight them or not, they will continue their fight against us. We have to destroy them, I don't like the cost, I don't like US soldiers killed, I don't like war. We must understand radical islam cannot be pacified they must be destroyed. I don't agree with everything Bush has done, I do agree with less taxes and the defense of our nation. The gov takes plenty of our money as it is. I hate what the ACLU has done to our country, the ACLU fought to get enemy combatants released from from Gitmo and they have now killed Americans abroad on several occasion. When I see people siding with our enemies I don't appreciate it one bit.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,925
Tokens
lander said:
The South and Midwest are too intolerant too elect a liberal, or any progressive for that matter. Change scares the begeebes out of them, so imagine what the non tax paying Churches threatening their souls would do. Spinkle a little anti-America fear-mong3ring reminiscent of Nazi Germany by Dick Cheney and you have a whole bunch of scared stupid people voting for a disaster.

I was pretty consistant in saying that I thought Bush would win. I had high, high hopes after the exit polls emerged, but hey -- who wouldn't have?

To summarize your deflection from my last factual post -- you are right, America will not elect a liberal.

Remember when I wanted Gephardt to win? Well, he certainly wasnt' my favorite -- labor unions do not help me one bit, but at least he had a chance of white trash America considering him.

Same story with Clark.

I did believe Edwards would have some sort of effect, but apparently I was grossly mistaken on his Southern "charm" being a factor.

Lander

IMO, the democrats could run Peter the Apostle and he would not win
the south. LBJ, said it right when he exclaimed we will win this civil
rights war but it will be with a great cost--the South. A great majority
of the South and the Midwest are so indoctrinated with the (liberal-devil)
tag that has been so succesfully pushed by the right wing that even
moderates are now under attack. If you don't agree with everything
right winged you are unfairly labeled a "liberal." I personally know people
that agree with almost everything the D's proclaim but will always vote
for the R because of the liberal label. You must give them credit, they
have invented and nurtured a lie with great success.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
>>Simply put...What is wrong with a little more personal responsibility and a little less government.
Gameface, nothing IMO -- and this is precisely the reason (coupled with abortion) that I registered as a Republican. However, the question comes in -- when does a Republican president start to take a "little more personal responsibility" that the GOP extremists so aggressively push upon America?? Bill Clinton embarrassed America and his family, but you know what -- nobody died from a blow job. George Bush has broken nearly every promise he made, his morals are a pathic attempt at a facade, and he rushed America into a war with Iraq based on fabricated evidence while Osama bin Laden is out making home videos?

At what point does GWB need to say, "sorry, I fuked up and tens of thousands of people died"?

This GOP middle/southern America has double standards when it comes to responsibility. The Bible speaks of helping the poor -- yet, you do less than the Dems to help the poor. Religion and government were clearly seperate, non-intersectable entities based on the 1st Ammendment -

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."


Yet, the GOP radicals are stating that winning 51% of the vote from 54% of the population is a mandate to change this?? What is wrong with you people? You are destroying the fundamental principals of America in the name of "patriotism"?? Has a bigger lie ever been told?

>>We are at war with radical islam, it doesn't matter if we fight them or not, they will continue their fight against us. We have to destroy them, I don't like the cost, I don't like US soldiers killed, I don't like war.
You do not like war?? You've been boasting about "first Iraq, then France" for months now. Either you have a demented sense of humor, you flip-flop or your trying to dove yourself after the damage has been done. Too late GF -- I see you for the hawk that you are. America needs middle ground based on comprising, not me telling you I support a war that I do not or you telling me that you do not want a war that you push for. I hope that I'm wrong for all of our sakes, but I see little common ground when it comes to these issues.

Sure, we can be civil, but the truth is that red and blue America is nothing new -- we havent' changed all that much since the Civil war.

>>We must understand radical islam cannot be pacified they must be destroyed.
Game, you may very well be right, but isnt' the problem that radical Islam and Iraq are not one-in-the-same? You seem to support the president because he's the president ... but why is a president not help accountable in your view? There is a distinction between patriotism and blind faith.

>>I don't agree with everything Bush has done, I do agree with less taxes and the defense of our nation. The gov takes plenty of our money as it is.
I agree, but only support tax cuts AFTER the budget is balanced. We do not have a tax break -- we have an advance on our SS.

>>I hate what the ACLU has done to our country, the ACLU fought to get enemy combatants released from from Gitmo and they have now killed Americans abroad on several occasion. When I see people siding with our enemies I don't appreciate it one bit.
Believe it or not, I can see your point, but I disagree. I think they go overboard, but protecting our freedoms and liberties is not something that shoud be subjective. Either we all have freedoms or we do not.

Yes, it is horrible when evil people slip though and do evil stuff, but it is equally evil when innocent people are deprived of basic rights.
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
Lander is absolutely correct about broken promises. These phoney's have financed a war and tax cuts by borrowing money. This is a completely irresponsible fiscal policy, and you have to wonder what they are really after. I say to pad the pockets of their masters for as long as they can.

You just can't give tax cuts to the richest during wartime, sell off our children's future with massive debt, not once deny a spending bill that comes across the desk, not one.

This guy is a laffer when it comes to true Conservatism and an outright joke when is comes to business. Look at his history. Failed this, bailed out that. Daddy's friends set me up, I fukked it up, but had fun doing it.

I just can't understand why you can't be critical of the rationale, especially when its your SS and your kid's future thats being sacrificed.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,884
Messages
13,574,681
Members
100,882
Latest member
topbettor24
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com