MJ sues supermarket for 8.9M

Search

MLB Junkie
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,411
Tokens
The owner of a supermarket chain must pay Michael Jordan $8.9 million for using his name and promoting a product in an ad without his permission.
A jury deliberated for six hours before handing down the verdict Friday night in federal court in Chicago, where Jordan won six NBA titles with the Bulls.

Lawyers for Safeway, owner of now-defunct Chicago-based chain Dominick's, said Jordan should be paid $126,900 for the use of his name in a 2009 ad Dominick's placed in a commemorative issue Sports Illustrated published for Jordan's induction into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame. But Jordan's lawyers and Jordan himself testified that his endorsement history suggests he would not have taken that deal.

Jordan's legal representatives brought in sports economist Andrew Zimbalist, who testified that Jordan's fair market value for the ad was $10 million.
"I'm pleased with today's verdict," Jordan said in a statement. "No one -- whether or not they're a public figure -- should have to worry about their identity being used without their permission. The case was not about the money as I plan to donate the proceeds to charity. It was about honesty and integrity. I hope this case sends a clear message, both here in the United States and around the world, that I will continue to be vigilant about protecting my name and identity. I also hope the size of the monetary reward will deter others from using someone else's identity and believe they will only pay a small penalty."
<aside class="inline inline-photo full" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: BentonSans, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: rgb(221, 221, 221); clear: both; margin: 6px 0px 18px; padding: 0px 0px 15px; width: 570px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px;"><figure style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 0; margin: 0px; position: relative;">
</figure></aside>During the trial, Jordan's legal team disclosed for the first time some of his endorsement income, including $480 million that was paid to him by Nike from 2000 to 2012. Jordan also revealed he turned down an $80 million offer to endorse headphones.
While Jordan was fighting to uphold the value of his name, Safeway was in a tougher position. The company bought Dominick's in 1998 for $1.2 billion but closed all stores by the end of 2013. The Jordan lawsuit was the bitter end of a huge money-losing venture.

In addition, the ad itself was of little benefit to the company. Since the ad was in a commemorative Sports Illustrated issue, those who bought the magazine were hesitant to tear out the ad. Only two people were found to have redeemed the $2 steak coupon.
Jordan hugged his lawyers after the decision was read.
"I'm so used to playing on a different court," a visibly delighted Jordan told reporters outside the courthouse.
Stepping back into the courthouse, two jurors asked him for a photograph, and he obliged by throwing his arms around them and smiling for a cellphone camera.

Jordan's fame loomed over the case, with one would-be juror struck from the pool during jury selection after describing Jordan as his idol. During closings earlier Friday, Jordan attorney Frederick Sperling appealed to city pride in trying to persuade jurors to side with Jordan.
"He gave us six championships," he told jurors, Jordan sitting nearby.

Three weeks ago, Jordan lost a legal battle to stop a company in China called Qiaodan Sports, even though the name means "Jordan," it has a similar silhouette to the Jumpman logo and it uses the number 23.


http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13486052/supermarket-chain-pay-michael-jordan-89-million-use-name


 

MLB Junkie
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,411
Tokens
"In addition, the ad itself was of little benefit to the company. Since the ad was in a commemorative Sports Illustrated issue, those who bought the magazine were hesitant to tear out the ad. Only two people were found to have redeemed the $2 steak coupon."


$4 in coupons for 9.8M lawsuit Slapping-silly90))
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Wow........lmao@ a billionaire suing because he was worth more than he was paid.

Damn Jordan & his ego.......I think he's the best basketball player ever, & he's a great business man, but IMO, he's also greedy, just like every billionaire out there.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
2,131
Tokens
Wow........lmao@ a billionaire suing because he was worth more than he was paid.

Damn Jordan & his ego.......I think he's the best basketball player ever, & he's a great business man, but IMO, he's also greedy, just like every billionaire out there.

If you allow others to infringe your trademark and don't take reasonable steps to protect it, you can lose your trademark protection.

This is all about protecting his trademark and billion dollar brand. As far as being greedy, he's donating every penny of the judgment to charity.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
11,413
Tokens
Point is :think2: not valid! Lucky I wasn't on jury b/c my thought is, look in your phone book, how many mike jordan names R Dare? and if the person doesn't have the cash how will they protect their identitySlapping-silly90)) notice his words..........

"I hope this case sends a clear message, both here in the United States and around the world, that I will continue to be vigilant about protecting my name and identity".

He didn't say I will and your idendity :think2:


If you don't have the cash, very tough finding anyone to listen to you or as I say anyone to tell you they believe! This should read.... The owner of a supermarket chain must pay Michael Jordan $8.9 million for using his name and promoting a product in an ad without his permission. MJ will recieve 8.9 M (-) his attorney fees of 35% with an explanation on how/when this supermarket must pay or what.

What happens if the owner returns to India? Will he/she/or they be re-imported? LoL

How does anyone pay 8.9 Million?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
If you allow others to infringe your trademark and don't take reasonable steps to protect it, you can lose your trademark protection.

This is all about protecting his trademark and billion dollar brand. As far as being greedy, he's donating every penny of the judgment to charity.



Billionaires don't give jack shit to charity unless there's something in it for them, like a tax break......

Bill Gates & others like him give money to charity to escape certain taxes......it pays to give to charity for them.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
2,131
Tokens
Billionaires don't give jack shit to charity unless there's something in it for them, like a tax break......

Bill Gates & others like him give money to charity to escape certain taxes......it pays to give to charity for them.

What? He won $8.9 million. When he donates it to charity (if he actually recovers it which is a whole other story) he'll write off that exact $8.9 million. There's no net gain there.

If he doesn't protect his brand/name/trademark, ANYONE will be able to use it for free and he'll no longer be able to sell the rights to it to make millions.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,613
Tokens
Billionaires don't give jack shit to charity unless there's something in it for them, like a tax break......

Bill Gates & others like him give money to charity to escape certain taxes......it pays to give to charity for them.

MJ is clearly in the right here. He worked his ass off and you can't just use his likeness whenever you want. This is why we have intellectual property laws.

As far as Bill Gates goes, he has been a great contributor to cutting the extreme global poverty rate in half over the last 20 years. I think we can probably say he is doing more for society than avoiding taxes. He just invested a billion dollars in nuclear power because he thinks it is the long-term future of energy. Him and his wife are about as good as it gets.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
11,413
Tokens
MJ is clearly in the right here. He worked his ass off and you can't just use his likeness whenever you want. This is why we have intellectual property laws.

As far as Bill Gates goes, he has been a great contributor to cutting the extreme global poverty rate in half over the last 20 years. I think we can probably say he is doing more for society than avoiding taxes. He just invested a billion dollars in nuclear power because he thinks it is the long-term future of energy. Him and his wife are about as good as it gets.

Can you say for sure

The Company who used MJ name was referencing MJ? MJ is not the only MJ thou MJ believes he is the only Michael Jordan??

BTW where does MJ's wife work?

lastly... You said........ "Him and his wife are about as good as it gets". What do you mean by saying, "Him and his wife are about as good as it gets".
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,613
Tokens
Can you say for sure

The Company who used MJ name was referencing MJ?

BTW where does MJ's wife work?

lastly... You said........ "Him and his wife are about as good as it gets". What do you mean by saying, "Him and his wife are about as good as it gets".

Cmon he clearly meant MJ. Be for real. Where does his wife work? I have no clue?

When I was saying him and his wife are as good as it gets. I meant Bill and Melinda Gates and I meant because of their constant devotion to making the world a better place for those in poverty.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
2,131
Tokens
Can you say for sure

The Company who used MJ name was referencing MJ?
MJ is not the only MJ thou MJ believes he is the only Michael Jordan??

BTW where does MJ's wife work?

lastly... You said........ "Him and his wife are about as good as it gets". What do you mean by saying, "Him and his wife are about as good as it gets".

Seriously? The ad was placed in a commorative Sports Illustrated devoted to Jordan. The ad congratulated him, had his silhouette, his number and his name in all caps along with a basketball.

I dont think the defendant even tried to pretend it wasn't about MJ because it was so obvious. The trial was strictly about damages. There was no debate as to whether it was about MJ.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,573,035
Members
100,866
Latest member
tt88myy
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com