Miss Me Yet? George W. Bush outpolls Barack Obama

[Acebb]

For 5 years the left loved pointing out GW Bush's approval rating when he left office. Well, he is more popular than the intellectually lazy clown who occupies the White House today.

Bush is seen in a favorable light by 52 percent of those surveyed, compared with 43 percent who still view the 43rd president unfavorably. Americans are split on Obama, with 49 percent responding favorably and unfavorably.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ty-obama-popularity-118576.html#ixzz3c0QZXojH

 

[vitterd]

If gw bush and Obama were on the ballot in 2016....Obama would win and it wouldn't be close.

So weird how you far righties don't understand polling. Looks like 2012 all over again.

 

[scottcarter]

If gw bush and Obama were on the ballot in 2016...

if that actually happened, shame on anyone that actually voted in 2016 then. They will burn in hell.

 

[vitterd]

if that actually happened, shame on anyone that actually voted in 2016 then. They will burn in hell.

Well....if people don't want 9/11 attack, unnecessary war, and complete economic collapse again go to hell....gonna be a full house down there.

 

[festeringZit]

Well....if people don't want 9/11 attack, unnecessary war, and complete economic collapse again go to hell....gonna be a full house down there.

Only complete fools blame Bush for the 9/11 attack, and the economic collapse.

 

[Willie99]

If gw bush and Obama were on the ballot in 2016....Obama would win and it wouldn't be close.

So weird how you far righties don't understand polling. Looks like 2012 all over again.

probably true, can't overcome those 10,000 to 0 districts in Philly

but W rolls with the more educated, more experienced, working, higher income, higher net worth & taxpaying vote

so weird how lefties don't understand who gives them power (hint: it's not the people that tend to fund their lost causes)

 

[Willie99]

liberal causes, so worthwhile and so just they have to lie about them

 

[vitterd]

Only complete fools blame Bush for the 9/11 attack, and the economic collapse.

Yeah, I'm sure if 9/11 happened while Obama was president or the economic collapse you would defend him. Lol.....cmon zit

 

[vitterd]

probably true, can't overcome those 10,000 to 0 districts in Philly

but W rolls with the more educated, more experienced, working, higher income, higher net worth & taxpaying vote

so weird how lefties don't understand who gives them power (hint: it's not the people that tend to fund their lost causes)

Philly districts----You do know those uneducated redneck states in the south vote R no matter what right?

More Educated---- you do know Obama wins the higher education vote....teachers excuse right?

More Experienced--- At what?

Working----if every unemployed person stayed home in 08 and 12 Obama is still president.

Higher Income--- a persons income shouldn't mean their vote should count more or less. You know how many high income people I know that are fucking idiots?

 

[scottcarter]

Yeah, I'm sure if 9/11 happened while Obama was president or the economic collapse you would defend him. Lol.....cmon zit

some crazies on the right would no doubt blame Obama. Just as those on the left are doing today. The extreme folk on either side have their agendas.

 

[SheriffJoe]

liberal causes, so worthwhile and so just they have to lie about them

Good ol' liberalism: ideas so good they have to be mandatory.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Obama’s popularity numbers are running well behind historic norms

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-good-news-people-think-hillary-is-different/

 

[festeringZit]

Yeah, I'm sure if 9/11 happened while Obama was president or the economic collapse you would defend him. Lol.....cmon zit

This is really a stupid answer.

You blame Bush for 9/11 because you think some guy on an internet bulletin board would blame Obama if he was President when it happened?

You look like a complete fool, why don't you just admit that Bush had absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attack, like sane people do?

I'll answer that question for you: Because you are a complete political hack, and a brainless ideologue.

 

[vitterd]

This is really a stupid answer.

You blame Bush for 9/11 because you think some guy on an internet bulletin board would blame Obama if he was President when it happened?

You look like a complete fool, why don't you just admit that Bush had absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attack, like sane people do?

I'll answer that question for you: Because you are a complete political hack, and a brainless ideologue.

I have always said that bush holds part of responsibility for 9/11. Richard Clarke had said so and his opinion means more than yours.

You and the other fringe nitwits would be blaming Obama nonstop if he was president on that day. That's just a fact. But we all know you loons are hypocrites so it is no shock at all.

Why can't you answer the questions? If 9/11 and economic collapse happened on obamas watch, would you be defending or blaming him? You won't answer because even you know you'll look like a fucking fool if you say you wouldn't blame him.

You, joe and Russ would have a thousand threads dedicated to it....several hundred that would accuse Obama of being part of the plot.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

This is really a stupid answer.

You blame Bush for 9/11 because you think some guy on an internet bulletin board would blame Obama if he was President when it happened?

You look like a complete fool, why don't you just admit that Bush had absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attack, like sane people do?

I'll answer that question for you: Because you are a complete political hack, and a brainless ideologue.

Look?

 

[ScottL]

Vitterd I destroyed Richard Clarke in here just a few weeks ago.

Also, and please absorb this - What someone in here says about who in our gov't is to blame for 9/11 doesn't change the reality. You can't make an assumption attacking Bush because you think your political foes would attack Obama if it happened under his watch. It's just silly.

You're going to have to accept (and I have proven this in here before as well) that there is a certain security apparatus that defends (or fails to protect) our nation that overrides party affiliation. IOW there is carry over of programs when presidents leave office.

You can claim Bush is responsible for 9/11 as I can claim Clinton should have snuffed OBL out long before. These are just claims and they get us nowhere.

To say a memo that states, "al Queda determined to attack America" is new info or a new warning, and that a president just entered into office ignored or prevented it is like saying Johnny Cueto read an article in the Philly Inquirer Tuesday morning, "Phillies determined to defeat Reds," and then blaming Cueto for the loss. You have no idea what programs Clinton may have put into place, or scrapped during his term that may have hindered his successor in fighting terrorism.

One final thing. Let's say Obama strikes a deal with Iran to quell their nuclear program. Then Mario Rubio is elected president. 6 months later Iran hits Seattle with a nuclear tipped missile. Whose fault is it, Rubio's or Obama's?

 

[russ1945]

In a sense Clinton classified Bin Laden as a JV same as Obama did with ISIS. Blame takes a back seat to consequences and the consequences always domino.

 

[Seymour]

Only complete fools blame Bush for the 9/11 attack, and the economic collapse.

Didn't you know that making credit easily available so everyone can own a home - even those that financially can't afford a home - are strong republican beliefs

 

[vitterd]

Vitterd I destroyed Richard Clarke in here just a few weeks ago.

Also, and please absorb this - What someone in here says about who in our gov't is to blame for 9/11 doesn't change the reality. You can't make an assumption attacking Bush because you think your political foes would attack Obama if it happened under his watch. It's just silly.

You're going to have to accept (and I have proven this in here before as well) that there is a certain security apparatus that defends (or fails to protect) our nation that overrides party affiliation. IOW there is carry over of programs when presidents leave office.

You can claim Bush is responsible for 9/11 as I can claim Clinton should have snuffed OBL out long before. These are just claims and they get us nowhere.

To say a memo that states, "al Queda determined to attack America" is new info or a new warning, and that a president just entered into office ignored or prevented it is like saying Johnny Cueto read an article in the Philly Inquirer Tuesday morning, "Phillies determined to defeat Reds," and then blaming Cueto for the loss. You have no idea what programs Clinton may have put into place, or scrapped during his term that may have hindered his successor in fighting terrorism.

One final thing. Let's say Obama strikes a deal with Iran to quell their nuclear program. Then Mario Rubio is elected president. 6 months later Iran hits Seattle with a nuclear tipped missile. Whose fault is it, Rubio's or Obama's?

After your Richard Clarke stuff was posted....somebody else posted stuff refuting what you said. So I'm going with the latter on that. Plus I've seen Clarke speak on many occasions about this stuff and find what he says to be accurate and credible. Obviously you don't.

Im saying the guy at the head of the ship has to take responsibility for something. Bush was president during 9/11, economic collapse, unnecessary wars and awful handling of Katrina....yet somehow the right finds a way to protect him from any culpability in any of it. The same group that blames Obama when it rains at their picnic. You can say that it is silly but it speaks to the hypocrisy of these nutters down here.

The Rubio example would be on Obama but wha if it happens 7 years into the Rubio presidency? You don't think these Russ, joe and zit types aren't gonna still say it was Obama or somehow dem caused?

the so called party of responsibility takes none of it.....ever.

 

[akphidelt]

I know I missed you! But only 1 post today Ace... that is very unlike you! I have some banking questions I'd like to ask you.