Line with TY LAW available?

[Fishhead]

Would NE still be -2 or less?

I WOULD LOVE NE IN THIS GAME AT ANYTHING UNDER -3 IF HE WERE 100% HEALTHY!

KEY injury for the Pats!

 

[MrTeaser]

Would have been very interesting to watch him in the lineup with the new rule changes. Would the refs follow through on the rule and if so would he have adjusted his game. We will never know

 

[HacheMan]

I was thinking this also Fish. I don't think it would have a bearing on the line though..........

 

[Fishhead]

I was thinking this also Fish. I don't think it would have a bearing on the line though..........

The hell it wouldnt!

NE would be at LEAST a solid -1.5 point favorite right now with a 100% healthy TY LAW available in my humble opinion.

 

[HacheMan]

Maybe in OUR eyes Fish, but I don't think the linesmakers have even taken it into account. I believe Indy's strong play is what the line is based upon, with or withouth Ty Law.....

 

[Fishhead]

Guess anything between -2 and Pk is rather a dead zone betting wise.........so basically in a round about way you are correct.

 

[Fishhead]

HACHE-

Believe this though, there would be alot more NE backers in this game if TY were healthy, including yours trully.

 

[HacheMan]

HACHE-

Believe this though, there would be alot more NE backers in this game if TY were healthy, including yours trully.

Agreed, but the public is in love with Indy, I don't think it would be enough to affect the line much at all. One of these days I will make the 1.5 hr. drive your way and we can have these "discussions" (not arguements LOL) together over some eats & drinks!

 

[Fishhead]

Sounds good Hache.......now back to this "discussion"

How in the world can you say a future HOF'er that would have a HUGE impact on this game would have no bearing on the line.

Listen again to what i stated........THERE ARE MANY WHO ARE NOT SIDING WITH NE IN THIS GAME STRICTLY BECAUSE TY IS OUT..........NOT TO MENTION MANY THAT ARE BETTING ON THE COLTS BECAUSE HE IS OUT.

Sorry, didnt mean to shout. :toast:

 

[HacheMan]

Sounds good Hache.......now back to this "discussion"

How in the world can you say a future HOF'er that would have a HUGE impact on this game would have no bearing on the line.

Listen again to what i stated........THERE ARE MANY WHO ARE NOT SIDING WITH NE IN THIS GAME STRICTLY BECAUSE TY IS OUT..........NOT TO MENTION MANY THAT ARE BETTING ON THE COLTS BECAUSE HE IS OUT.

Sorry, didnt mean to shout. :toast:

See....this is where we the disagreement is, up above in bold, lol. You say more bettors are taking Ty Law's absence into account,and I agree, but only the minority, or experienced bettors.What I'm saying is the the public & majority is simply in love with Indy, overruling your your theory above........LMAO......we could continue this forever...

 

[Rainbow]

I think Ty Law is great, but I think all the squares are betting on Peyton Manning.

 

[Fishhead]

Understand, one WISEGUY can offset 100 squares moneywise on a line!

Sure you realize that.

 

[Rainbow]

I am not trying to argue, but the bottom line is in certain games the PUBLIC can be alot stronger than wise guys, and trust me this is one of thode games.

 

[HacheMan]

I already called your next comeback Fish! I knew that one was coming! LOL
Take this into account.......There are many more "square" Dime bettors out there than there are Dime "Wiseguy" bettors!

Ok.....I'm done.....

I know where you're coming from, and I agee Ty Law's precense would make a difference, I just don't feel "that" much......

Hey Fish, those picks I saw, were those 2 females your family? If so, do they frequent with you to Selmons, etc?

 

[Fishhead]

No, SELMONS is my work area.

 

[HacheMan]

Ok, just wanted to make sure. I Wasn't sure if they were with you often and if it stopped you from interacting with others if they meet with you......

 

[JudgeWapner]

Oly has NE-1 and Grande Colts-1.

 

[Fishhead]

Oly has NE-1 and Grande Colts-1.

Sounds like a battle between two top shops!

:smoker2:

 

[Noreaga+]

ill take OLY all day

 

[jjgold]

Pats won plenty without him