It seems to me they should be the same. The Feds don't like sportsbetting, but online poker is growing. This is good, IMO. Prohibition against gambling online is tougher,with more players. I'm not sure how many Americans gamble online, I'd think over a million. ESPN poker coverage doesn't hurt.
I think the poker draws a slightly different crowd. Most sports bettors have probably played poker, not as sure about poker players betting games.
Many will eventually cross-over. It's all good, in terms of protecting our right to gamble. It's kind of ridiculous when you look at LV Hilton contest. Many non LV residents would enter, but the process of cutting in a proxy, discourages many. The IRS could even hold a percentage paid to winners, like a racetrack does when you hit a nice trifecta. I'm not for that, but it's workable. I guess they might already do that, but I believe it's not done ...YET.
My point is that Poker will help sportsbetting remain "legal" in the upcoming years.
I think the poker draws a slightly different crowd. Most sports bettors have probably played poker, not as sure about poker players betting games.
Many will eventually cross-over. It's all good, in terms of protecting our right to gamble. It's kind of ridiculous when you look at LV Hilton contest. Many non LV residents would enter, but the process of cutting in a proxy, discourages many. The IRS could even hold a percentage paid to winners, like a racetrack does when you hit a nice trifecta. I'm not for that, but it's workable. I guess they might already do that, but I believe it's not done ...YET.
My point is that Poker will help sportsbetting remain "legal" in the upcoming years.