DR.PEPPER you seem OK but please save me the insight 20 minutes after the half has started....
The LAKERS +8 is a very low percentage bet as the 3rd & 4th esp. on the West Coast is the strongest home team quarters for their division....ANd mathematically it makes even less sense as you now have an adjusted line of SAC -2 -110 for the game..as compared to -8 -110 at the start of the game...Great Value on the home team in these cases...If you say this was easy money than you must have thought CLE was a good bet against the Pistons for the 2nd half..it was not either... and the most probable result ( the home team covered the adjusted line) occured....Anyways I was on SAC -7.5 2nd half so perhaps I am a tad bitter that they did not show up for the 2nd half but saying the LAKERS were easy money is retarded and very square....Have a good day...
The LAKERS +8 is a very low percentage bet as the 3rd & 4th esp. on the West Coast is the strongest home team quarters for their division....ANd mathematically it makes even less sense as you now have an adjusted line of SAC -2 -110 for the game..as compared to -8 -110 at the start of the game...Great Value on the home team in these cases...If you say this was easy money than you must have thought CLE was a good bet against the Pistons for the 2nd half..it was not either... and the most probable result ( the home team covered the adjusted line) occured....Anyways I was on SAC -7.5 2nd half so perhaps I am a tad bitter that they did not show up for the 2nd half but saying the LAKERS were easy money is retarded and very square....Have a good day...
I called the local at 11:45 to double up on my original losing wager on Sacramento. I sure am glad no one answered the phone and that I didn't try to call back. -2200, instead of -4400. Sac was definitely the play at half. Lake show shot 56 or 57% from the floor first half and only held a 6 or 7 point lead. I figured Sac was money in the bank, very, very happy that no one picked up that phone. Thanks "Local"Dr.Pepper said:
Treez
