Kirk Cousins, Redskins break off contract negotiations

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
The Washington Redskins have broken off negotiations with quarterback Kirk Cousins, a team source told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter on Tuesday.


No further talks are scheduled, the source told Schefter. Another source recently told ESPN that the two sides were not close in earlier discussions and that the gap had not been closed in the ensuing weeks.


The source also told Schefter it's not a foregone conclusion that the Redskins would use the franchise tag on Cousins. Teams have until March 1 to apply the franchise tag.


The Redskins have expressed a desire to sign Cousins to a long-term deal, but they've also made it clear privately that they would only do so at the right price. If they placed the franchise tag on Cousins, it would cost them approximately $20 million for a one-year contract, based on current projections.


If Cousins hit the open market, he would do so as one of the more attractive options to teams needing a quarterback. But it's uncertain what sort of deal that would produce for him, as he's started only 25 regular-season games in his career. He's coming off his best season, and also his first full season as the starter, having thrown 29 touchdown passes and 11 interceptions.


In his first 20 career games, covering 15 starts, Cousins threw for a combined 24 touchdowns and 27 interceptions. He threw 23 touchdowns and only three picks in his next 10 outings.


The Redskins went 9-7 and won the NFC East title, but lost to the Green Bay Packers in the first round of the playoffs.


Cousins, a fourth-round pick in 2012, supplanted Robert Griffin III as the starter in August. The Redskins picked up Griffin's $16.15 million option for 2016, but are expected to release him by the time the new league year begins March 9 -- unless they can redo his option and trade him. No trades can be executed until after the league year opens. Regardless, he does not figure in Washington's plans.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
After yesterday's debacle, Cousins was savaged online by Redskins fans.

Kirk Cousins’ starting record: 19-21-1

Cousins’ record against teams with 9+ wins: 2-11

Record vs Teams with 8+ wins: 5-13

====
Kirk Cousins against the Giants when NYG had nothing to play for:

22/35, 285 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT, 74.1 rating

 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
LOL

[h=1]Kirk Cousins choked away the playoffs, but the Redskins should still give him $100 million[/h]

When it meant the most, when the team he’d led all season, setting records along the way, played the only game that mattered, Kirk Cousins looked nothing like a franchise quarterback who should be commanding a nine-figure contract two months from now. But despite Cousins having his worst performance of the season in the Washington Redskins’ do-or-die, 19-10 death to the New York Giants — and despite what you’ll hear from the knee-jerk armchair general managing this week and beyond — his market value is unchanged.

Cousins will be back in Washington, for somewhere in the area of — and this is just a guess — $100 million with $55 million guaranteed. That’s the market, and unless the Redskins have an alternate plan in mind — which they don’t — Dan Snyder is going to have to cut that check.
 

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,001
Tokens
At least Romo waits for the playoffs to implode.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,142
Tokens
After yesterday's debacle, Cousins was savaged online by Redskins fans.

Kirk Cousins’ starting record: 19-21-1

Cousins’ record against teams with 9+ wins: 2-11

Record vs Teams with 8+ wins: 5-13

====
Kirk Cousins against the Giants when NYG had nothing to play for:

22/35, 285 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT, 74.1 rating


The Giants may of had nothing to play for, but they didn't play like that. They were supposed to pull their starters like the Cowboys did, but they didn't.

Mother fuckers pissed me off
 

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
8,145
Tokens
The Giants may of had nothing to play for, but they didn't play like that. They were supposed to pull their starters like the Cowboys did, but they didn't.

Mother fuckers pissed me off


You and me both. The mara family hates the redskins, especially Snyder. They were the ones pushing for us to receive that 36 million dollar cap hit over 2 years. Im sure they had a say in the decision to play the starters for longer than needed.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,615
Tokens
The Redskins lost because they simply aren't good. They didn't play anywhere near good football the last five games, even during the two wins.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
Kirk Cousins doesn’t sound willing to do a team-friendly deal

He seems to be intent on figuring out exactly what his market value is, and maximizing it.

“[T]here’s other quarterbacks that come after you and it would be almost a selfish move to hurt future quarterbacks who get in a position to have a contract,” Cousins told 106.7 The Fan in D.C. on Monday. “And if you don’t take a deal that’s fair to you, then you’re also taking a deal that’s not fair to them and you’re setting them back as well. So there’s different reasons. You just do the best you can.”
 

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,001
Tokens
Imagine the travesty of setting guys back to 12 million a year. you're my hero, Kirk.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
561
Tokens
dont see a problem with this move..i have a problem with a guy signing contract and then trying to get a new contract 2 years later when he still has 4 years left. just know if these players werent valuable or worthy, the owners would drop them in a heartbeat without blinking an eye
 

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,001
Tokens
Would you take less than what you're worth on the open market to help your current company?

No, I would not.

But I wouldn't give a bullshit reason like "I don't want to hurt future quarterbacks" (employees). Just say you want as much as you can get. There's nothing wrong with that. Don't try to sound like a martyr. You ain't all that.
 

New member
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
10,462
Tokens
No, I would not.

But I wouldn't give a bullshit reason like "I don't want to hurt future quarterbacks" (employees). Just say you want as much as you can get. There's nothing wrong with that. Don't try to sound like a martyr. You ain't all that.
:103631605
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
Would you take less than what you're worth on the open market to help your current company?

Well, that is a strawman and it isn't some sort of apples to apples comparison.

If you had made almost $30 million dollars and were going to make another $98 million and were haggling over an additional $12 million, probably.

Note that people in the private sector do this all the time. They forgo salary for equity in companies.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
336
Tokens
guy is a chump. anyone paying him above average dollars is retarded, no heart in the guy he just chokes. Huge red flag when a team who sees you everyday doesnt want to lock you up
 

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
2,674
Tokens
Kirk Cousins may have choked away the playoffs but he'll still get $100M from multiple teams for the simple fact that these are the other free agent QBs available: Ryan Fitzpatrick, Case Keenum, Matt Cassel, Geno Smith, Ryan Mallett, Christian Ponder, Mike Glennon, Blaine Gabbert, EJ Manuel, Kellen Moore, Matt Barkley and a few others.

NFL draft is also pretty bleak for franchise QBs.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
Well, that is a strawman and it isn't some sort of apples to apples comparison.

If you had made almost $30 million dollars and were going to make another $98 million and were haggling over an additional $12 million, probably.

Note that people in the private sector do this all the time. They forgo salary for equity in companies.


Forgoing salary for equity in a company is not similar to forgoing salary to "take a hometown discount".
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
But it is similar to taking less than what you're worth "on the market"

It's really not. Taking equity in the company is simply taking something other than salary as part of your compensation. That isn't any option for an NFL QB. Salary is the only way the Redskins or any other NFL Team can pay Cousins.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
It's really not. Taking equity in the company is simply taking something other than salary as part of your compensation. That isn't any option for an NFL QB. Salary is the only way the Redskins or any other NFL Team can pay Cousins.

It is more similar because there is no guaranteed return if you take an equity stake.

It is more similar to taking a hometown discount that trying to compare the average Joe to Cousins.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,858
Messages
13,574,196
Members
100,877
Latest member
businesstalkmag
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com