Kids referee system plays for 2/3 (52-47 ytd)

Search

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
2,200
Tokens
The following is my daily disclaimer. Anything in bold is something I added recently.


FWIW...

For those that are unfamiliar with my plays, I play games based on the announced referee matchups for each game. I have compiled sides and totals ATS records for every NBA ref for the past 8 years and ranked them all. My rankings are weighted more toward more recent seasons to take into account refs that change their style over the years. They're also weighted more heavily toward refs with more games officiated to downplay short term trends that may be just coincidental (ie. I rank Marc Davis, a ref with a career 23-13 home/away record below Joe Derosa, a ref with a career 242-234 record). Just this past month I added each ref's fouls/game average to the rankings, with the assumption that more fouls/game equates to a better chance for the over. Indeed, I have found that there is a pretty decent correlation factor between the two.

The results are quite interesting. There are numerous refs with a definite bias in one way or other. For example, one of my favorite refs is Joey Crawford who has made money for under bettors every year AND he's one of the best ref's for playing road teams every year, too. Very often, when he's reffing, I'll play the home team to go under the individual team total as a way of combining both trends. Of course, this is assuming that the other 2 refs do not have tendancies in the other direction. My go / no-go decision on playing the game is based on ALL 3 REFS in other words.

Each game has 3 refs assigned to it, so what I'll do is compare the relative rankings of all 3 refs to see if they all have the same bias in some particular direction (home, road, over, or under). When I find a combination of refs whose biases combine to exceed my predetermined "go / no-go" level, I make the game a play.

I have used this system for 3 years and have hit 55% sides and nearly 60% on the totals. It has always worked best in the 2nd half of the season. I believe that is due to some refs that change their reffing style. My guess is that they are most likely to change their style between seasons, and consequently the early season games are more of a crapshoot. This season is showing the same trend. I was 17-19 before I stopped playing the games in early Dec. Since I started up again in early Jan, and after updating my data with fouls/game stats, I've gone 35 -28.

The one downside to posting these plays, however, is that the ref matchups are very often not announced til just a couple of minutes prior to gametime. Consequently, many of you wishing to play these games will miss out if you don't catch my post right away. My suggestion is this - if you miss out on the game start, wait til halftime and make the same play for the 2nd half. The refs don't change at halftime, so theoretically it should work just as well for 2nd half totals. I have checked this out for myself and the plays win the 2nd half just as often, regardless of what happened in the 1st half.

I have started adding my rating for each game that I'm playing. My rating is a numerical value of how strong the play is. The number is basically the ADJUSTED sums of the ATS career records of the 3 assigned refs for each game. For example: The refs for last night's Phil/Dallas game were Bennie Adams, Blane Reichelt, and Greg Willard. The career (adjusted) ATS average winning pct for Home teams when one of these refs were officiating were 51.3%, 47.1%, and 52.6% respectively. I calculate my rating by summing the averages and subtracting the result from 150% (3 times a perfectly "average" ref). Therefore in this case we had 51.3 +47.1 + 52.6 = 151.0. 151.0 -150 = +1.0. This indicates there was a slight bias toward the home team by this trio of refs, but not enough to make the game a play. I make a game a play if the number is higher than 7.2, so this game was far below the level I judge to be a play. After completing the analysis for Home/Away, I do the same analysis for the over/under. Note: I still make all plays for 1 unit regardless of the strength of the play.

Here's my list of top 5's:

Top 5 Refs for playing home teams
Sean Corbin 55.7% ATS
Tom Washington 54.4% ATS
Gary Zielinski 53.7% ATS
Ron Olesiak 53.4% ATS
Ed Rush 52.8%

Top 5 Refs for playing Road teams:
Joe Crawford 45.3% ATS
Jim Clark 45.4% ATS
Monty McCutchen 45.8% ATS
Bob Delaney 46.9% ATS
Jason Phillips 46.9% ATS

Top 5 Refs for playing overs:
Joe Forte 56.5% ATS
Jim Clark 56.0% ATS
Ed Rush 54.7% ATS
Leroy Richardson 54.7% ATS
Phil Robinson 54.3% ATS

Top 5 Refs for playing unders:
Kevin Fehr 41.8% ATS
Joe Crawford 42.3% ATS
Scott Foster 44.5% ATS
Mark Wunderlich 44.6% ATS
Ron Olesiak 45.1% ATS

A couple of things to note from these rankings. First, notice that the ATS percentages are more extreme for the over/unders than the home/aways. This goes a long way toward explaining why I have been more successful playing totals than sides.

Second, notice that there are 4 refs that appear in the top 5 in two different categories. When one of these refs is officiating, I often use this info to combine his tendancies into a single play on an individual team total. For example, in these four cases I'll play it like this:

With Joe Crawford (42.3% overs, 45.3% home), I'll play the home team to go under.
With Ed Rush (54.7% overs, 52.8% home), I'll play the home team to go over.
With Jim Clark (56.0% overs, 45.4% home), I'll play the road team to go over.
With Ron Olesiak (45.1% overs, 53.4% home), I'll play the road team to go under.

This of course assumes that the other 2 refs are not biased significantly in the other direction.


Anyway, good luck to anyone wishing to use this info. Tonight's plays coming up soon.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
2,200
Tokens
Tonight, I will give ratings for each game as soon as refs are announced. Note: ONLY THE GAMES IN BOLD ARE PLAYS.


(+8.8 ATS over) Cleve/Miami over 204
(+0.2 ATS home) Miami very slight lean
 

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
2,200
Tokens
(+0.7 ATS home) Memphis very slight lean
(+7.4 ATS over) Memphis/LAC over 175.5

just updating the ATS rating here, not changing the pick
 
Last edited:

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
2,200
Tokens
(-8.3 ATS road) (-7.5 ATS under) San Ant -9 & San Ant/LAL under 185.5 2-team parlay
 

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
2,200
Tokens
When the system picks a heavy favorite AND the under on the same game, I like to play it as a parlay. This is because when a team is blowing out another, there is never any of the last minute "foul, time out, quick shot, repeat" nonsense which drives up the final score in so many games. Consequently, this makes for a somewhat correlated parlay.

Note: For the purposes of grading the parlay, if it wins I will count it as +3 in the win column. If it loses, I'll count it as -1 in the loss column. I feel this is fair because a 2-team parlay has only a theoretical 1 in 4 chance of winning, and it will pay 3 times what a straight wager will pay.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
2,200
Tokens

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,471
Messages
13,568,637
Members
100,801
Latest member
ps5repairs
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com